Prosecutorial Discretion and the Death Penalty: An Integral Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2013.02.39Keywords:
Prosecutors, ethics, Integral theory, death penalty, capital punishmentAbstract
The prosecutor’s choice to pursue the death penalty is one of the most momentous decisions he or she will face. Capital punishment represents the ultimate power of the state over its citizenry, and the decision to take the life of an offender is fraught with moral complexity. This paper reviews some of the extant literature on the US death penalty in general and the particular issue of decision-making for prosecutors. Further, we introduce discussion on how Wilber’s Integral theory might be applied to the topic. We present aspects of Integral theory, including the four quadrant model and what Wilber refers to as the Basic Moral Intuition (BMI), as possible tools that may be used to navigate the ethical difficulties surrounding this decision-making process. We anticipate that delving into aspects of the Integral theory and contemplating on how they relate to concrete issues of criminal prosecution may assist CJ practitioners in how they might find pathways to resolutions of ethical quandaries.
References
Barnes, K., Sloss, D. & Thaman, S. (2008). Life and death decisions: Prosecutorial discretion and capital punishment in Missouri. Arizona Legal Studies Discussion Paper No. 08-03; 3rd Annual Conference on Empirical Legal Studies Papers. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1107456 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1107456
Barton, R. L. (2013, January 29). How Prosecutorial discretion furthers justice. The Crime Report. Retrieved from http://www.thecrimereport.org
Beck, D.E. & Cowan, C.C. (1996). Spiral dynamics: Mastering values, leadership, and change. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
Bellow, S. (1996). Seize the day. London: Penguin Classics. (Originally published 1956).
Bentham, J. (1781). An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Retrieved from http://www.utilitarianism.com/ jeremy-bentham/#one
Brooks, T. (2003). Kant’s theory of punishment. Utilitas, 15, 206-234. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0953820800003952 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953820800003952
Burns, J.H. (2005). Happiness and utility: Jeremy Bentham’s equation. Utilitas, 17, 46-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0953820804001396 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953820804001396
Champion, D.R. (2011a).An Integral model of criminality: Aspects of criminal behavior. Insights to a Changing World Journal, 2011 (4), 23-39. Retrieved fromhttp://www.franklinpublishing. net
Champion, D.R. (2011b). White-collar crimes and organizational offending: An Integral approach. International Journal of Business, Humanities and Technology, 1 (3), 34-45. Retrieved from http://www.ijbhtnet.com/
Charleston County Government. (2011). Number of counties by state. Retrieved from http://www.charlestoncounty.org/ stats/bystate.htm
Death Penalty Information Center (2011). The Death Penalty in 2011: Year end report. Retrieved from http://www.deathpenaltyinfo. org/documents/2011__Year__End.pdf
DeMay, J. (1998). A district attorney’s decision whether to seek the death penalty: Toward an improved process. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 26, 765-820. Retrieved from http://law. fordham.edu/fordham-urban-law-journal/ulj.htm
Everson, Z. (2009). Excessive cost leads Idaho, Mississippi prosecutors not to pursue the death penalty. Retrieved from http://kcadp.org/2009/11/13/excessive-cost-leads-idaho- mississppi-prosecutors-not-to-pursue-the-death-penalty/
Frederick, B. &Stemen, D. (2012). The anatomy of discretion: An analysis of prosecutorial decision making (Document No. 240334). Washington, DC: US Department of Justice. Retrieved from https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/ 240334.pdf
Gebser, J.P. (1985). The ever-present origin.(N. Barstad& A. Mickunas, Trans.). Athens, OH: Ohio University Press. Original work published 1949.
Gershman, B.L. (1993). A moral standard for the prosecutor’s exercise of the charging discretion. PaceLaw Faculty Publications, paper 137. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.pace.edu/lawfaculty/137/
Gibbs, J.J., Giever, D. &Pober, K.A. (2000). Criminology and The Eye of the Spirit: An introduction and application of the thoughts of Ken Wilber. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 16(1), 99-127. Retrieved from http://ccj.sagepub.com http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1043986200016001006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986200016001006
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. [Kindle Cloud Version]. Retrieved from http://www.amazon.com
Griffin, A. (2012, September 5). Prosecutor spared further grilling in death penalty bias case, Hartford Courant. Retrieved from http://articles.courant.com
Horowitz, J. A. (1997). Prosecutorial discretion and the death penalty: Creating a committee to decide whether to seek the death penalty, Fordham Law Review, 65, 2571-2610. Retrieved from http://fordhamlawreview.org/
Jackson, R. H. (1940). The federal prosecutor. Journal of the American Institute of Criminal Law & Criminology, 31, 3-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1137244 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1137244
Kohlberg, L. (1973). The claim to moral adequacy of a highest stage of moral judgment. Journal of Philosophy, 70, 630-646. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2025030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2025030
Kupers, W. &Statler, M. (2008). Practically wise leadership: Toward an integral understanding. CultureOrganization, 14, 379-400. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14759550802489771 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14759550802489771
Kohlberg, L. &Hersh, R.H. (1977). Moral development: A review of the theory. Theory into Practice, 16, 53-59. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/htip20/current#.UgvrJ5KTjNs http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00405847709542675 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00405847709542675
Lafler v. Cooper, 132 S.Ct. 1376 (2012). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-29160-8_10
Lobsenz, J. (1984). Unbridled prosecutorial discretion, Puget Sound Law Review. Retrieved fromhttp://www.law.seattleu.edu/ academics/journals/law-review
Mangino, M. (2012, April 9). Supreme Court opens door to ineffective plea-bargaining Claim. Pennsylvania Law Weekly. Retrieved from http://www.mattmangino.com/2012/04/supreme-court-opens-door-to-ineffective.html
Marshall, A. (2012, September 16). Death Row in Ohio Shrinking. Cleveland Plain Dealer. Retrieved from http://www. cleveland.com/open/index.ssf/2012/09/death_row_in_ohio_shrinking_as.html
Martin, R. (2006). Criminology needs an integral vision. AQAL: Journal of Integral Theory and Practice, 1 (1), 235-266. Retrieved from http://aqaljournal.integralinstitute.org/Public/
Martin, R., Cohen, J.W. & Champion, D.R. (2013). Conceptualization, operationalization, construct validity, and truth in advertising in criminological research. Journal of Theoretical andPhilosophical Criminology. 5, 1, 1-38. Retrieved from: http://www.jtpcrim.org
Missouri v. Frye, 1329 S.Ct. 1399 (2012).
Ohio Prosecuting Attorneys Association (2012). Death penalty. Retrieved from http://www.ohiopa.org/deathpenalty.html
Oppel, R. (2011, September 26). Sentencing Shift Gives New Leverage to Prosecutors. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com
Pepinksi, H. &Quinney, R. (1991). Criminology as peacemaking. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Petersen, N. &Lynch, M. (2012) Prosecutorial discretion, hidden cost, and the death penalty: The case of Los Angeles County. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 102, 101-144. Retrieved from http://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern. edu/jclc/
Piaget, J. (1997). The moral judgment of the child. (M. Gabain, Trans.). New York: Simon & Schuster. (Original work published 1932)
Public Broadcasting Service (2004). Frontline: The plea. Retrieved from http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/plea/ interviews/
Quinney, R. (1991). The way of peace: On crime, suffering and service. In H. Pepinsky& R. Quinney (Eds.). Criminology as peacemaking (pp. 3-13). Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
Sievert, R. J. (1999). Capital murder: a prosecutor's personal observations on the prosecution of capital cases. American Journal of Criminal Law, 27, 105-116. Retrieved from: http://ajclonline.org/
Tennessee Supreme Court (2005). Media guide to Tennessee’s legal system. (2005, May). Retrieved from http://www.tncourts.gov/ sites/default/files/mediaguidetotnlegalsystem.pdf
Wilber, K. (1998). The marriage of sense and soul: Integrating science and religion. Boston, MA: Shambhala.
Wilber, K. (2000). Sex, ecology, spirituality: The spirit of evolution. Boston, MA: Shambhala.
Wilber, K. (2001). A theory of everything. Boston, MA: Shambhala.
Wilber, K. (2003). Interview by Tami Simon [Sound recording]. Kosmic Consciousness, Sounds True. Boulder, CO.
Wilber, K. (2007). The Integral vision. Boston, MA: Shambhala.
Witherspoon, T. (2012, October 21). Pursuit of Death Penalty Slows, Waco Tribune, Retrieved March 17, 2013. From http://www.wacotrib.com
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2013 International Journal of Criminology and Sociology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Policy for Journals/Articles with Open Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work
Policy for Journals / Manuscript with Paid Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Publisher retain copyright .
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work .
