Scientific Findings on the Quality of River Buffalo Meat and Prospects for Future Studies

Authors

  • Rosy Cruz-Monterrosa Department of Food Science, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana (UAM), Lerma Campus, Lerma City, 52005, Mexico
  • Daniel Mota-Rojas Neurophysiology, Behaviour and Animal Welfare Assessment, DPAA, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana (UAM), Xochimilco Campus, Mexico City, 04960, Mexico
  • Efren Ramirez-Bribiesca Livestock Production, Colegio de Postgraduados, Montecillo, 56230, Texcoco, México
  • Patricia Mora-Medina Livestock Science Department, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Facultad de Estudios Superiores Cuautitlán, State of Mexico, 54714, Mexico
  • Isabel Guerrero-Legarreta Emeritus Professor, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana (UAM) Iztapalapa Campus, Department of Biotechnology, Food Science, Mexico City, 09340, Mexico

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1927-520X.2020.09.18

Keywords:

ubalus bubalis, sensory analysis, food safety, nutritional, healthy, human consumption, conservation, packaging, authenticity.

Abstract

The objectives of this review are to detect scientific findings and areas of opportunity in the study of river buffalo meat from primary production through commercialization and to establish future areas of research linked to each step of the meat supply chain to strengthen and improve the production and quality of buffalo meat in the future. Recent studies show that buffalo meat is healthy and that the prevalence of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases is not related to intramuscular fat consumption. The current grand demand for food constitutes an ongoing challenge for agricultural production. Of course, this demand includes meat, but the animal species traditionally destined for human consumption are no longer capable of satisfying requirements. This review detected gaps in studies of the alimentary systems of this species (including its digestive tract) and a paucity of analyses designed to determine the optimum slaughtering age. Identifying –and correcting– practices that foster contamination, reduce the shelf life of buffalo meat, and suggest appropriate conservation and packaging methods during commercialization are two additional pending concerns. This study concludes that marketing buffalo meat represents a great challenge for producers and researchers, one that requires a multi- and interdisciplinary approach that examines in detail every step of the productive chain.

References

Tamburrano A, Tavazzi B, Maria Callà CA, Amorini AM, Lazzarino G, Vincenti S, et al. Biochemical and nutritional characteristics of buffalo meat and potential implications on human health for a personalized nutrition. Ital J Food Saf 2019; 8: 174-179. https://doi.org/10.4081/ijfs.2019.8317 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/ijfs.2019.8317

FAO. 2015. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, International Fund for Agricultural Development, World Food Programme. The State of Food Insecurity in the World 2015. Meeting the 2015 international hunger targets: Taking Stock of Uneven Progress. FAO.

FAO. 2019. Sustainable Development Goals (SDG). End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture. http://www.fao.org/ sustainable-development-goals/news/detail-news/en/c/424259/

Bertoni A, Álvarez-Macias A, Mota-Rojas D. Productive performance of buffaloes and their development options in tropical regions. Soc Rur Prod Med Amb 2019; 19: 59-80.

Bertoni A, Napolitano F, Mota-Rojas D, Sabia E, Alvarez-Macias A, Mora-Medina P, et al. Similarities and differences between river buffaloes and cattle: health, physiological, behavioural and productivity aspects. J Buffalo Sci 2020; 9: 92-109. https://doi.org/10.6000/1927-520X.2019.08.03.12 DOI: https://doi.org/10.6000/1927-520X.2020.09.12

Guerrero-Legarreta I, Napolitano F, Mota-Rojas D, Cruz-Monterrosa R, Mora-Medina P, Berdugo-Gutiérrez J. El búfalo de agua, versatil y rústico como productor de carne. Agro Meat. Buenos Aires, Argentina 2019; Febrero: 1-10.

Guerrero-Legarreta I, Napolitano F, Cruz-Monterrosa RG, Mota-Rojas D, Mora-Medina P, Ramírez-Bribiesca E, et al. A River buffalo meat production and quality: sustainability, productivity, chemical composition and sensory properties. J Buffalo Sci 2020; 9: 159-169. https://doi.org/10.6000/1927-520X.2020.09.17 DOI: https://doi.org/10.6000/1927-520X.2019.08.03.17

Neath KE, Del Barrio AN, Lapitan RM, Herrera JR, Fujihara T, Muroya S, et al. Protease activity higher in postmortem water buffalo meat than Brahman beef. Meat Sci 2007; 77: 389-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.04.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.04.010

Robertson J, Bouton PE, Harris PV, Shorthose WR, Ratcliff D. A comparison of some properties of beef and buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) meat. J Food Sci 1983; 48: 686-690. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1983.tb14876.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1983.tb14876.x

Sharma N, Gandemer G, Goutefongea R, Kowale BN. Fatty acid composition of water buffalo meat. Meat Sci 1986; 16: 237-243. https://doi.org/10.1016/0309-1740(86)90029-X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0309-1740(86)90029-X

Naveena BM, Mendiratta SK, Anjaneyulu ASR. Tenderization of buffalo meat using plant protease from Cucumis trigonus ruxb (Kachri) and Zingiber officinale roscoe (Ginger rhizome). Meat Sci 2004; 68: 363-369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.04.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.04.004

Naveena BM, Kiran M, Sudhakar Reddy K, Ramkrishna C, Vaithiyanathan S, Devatkal SK. Effect of ammonium hydroxide on ultrastructure and tenderness of buffalo meat. Meat Sci 2011; 88: 727-732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2011.03.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2011.03.005

Kandeepan G, Biswas S, Rajkumar RS. Buffalo as a potential food animal. Int J Livest Prod 2009; 1: 001-005.

Neath KE, Del Barrio AN, Lapitan RM, Herrera JRV, Fujihara T, Muroya S, et al., Difference in tenderness and pH decline between water buffalo meat and beef during postmortem aging. Meat Sci 2007; 75: 499-505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.08.016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.08.016

Kiran M, Naveena BM, Reddy KS, Shahikumar M, Reddy VR, Kulkarni V, et al. Muscle-specific variation in buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) meat texture: biochemical, ultrastructural and proteome characterization. J Texture Studies 2015; 46: 254-261. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtxs.12123 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jtxs.12123

FAO. 2020. Livestock systems. http://www.fao.org/livestock-systems/global distributions/buffaloes/en/

Iqbal A, Mirza MA, Raza SH. Role of Buffaloe in contributing milk and meat in Pakistan. Ital J Anim Sci 2007; 6: 1387-1389. https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2007.s2.1387 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2007.s2.1387

Fundora O, Roque R, Sánchez R. Datos preliminares de la conducta alimentaria de búfalos de río en pastoreo. Cuban J Agr Sci 2001; 35: 15-17.

Romero SD, Pérez de León AA. Bubalinocultura en México: retos de industria pecuaria naciente. Logros y Desafíos de la Ganadería Doble Propósito 2014; 6: 15.

Marai IFM, Haeeb AAM. Buffalo's biological functions as affected by heat stress — A review. Livest Sci 2009; 127: 89-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2009.08.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2009.08.001

Mota-Rojas D, De Rosa G, Mora-Medina P, Braghieri A, Guerrero-Legarreta I. Napolitano F. Invited review: Dairy buffalo behaviour and welfare from calving to milking. CAB Rev 2019; 14: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1079/PAVSNNR201914035 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1079/PAVSNNR201914035

Mota-Rojas D, Napolitano F, Bertoni MA, Gómez-Prado J, Mora-Medina P, Cruz-Monterrosa R, et al. Thermal biology in river buffalo in the humid tropics: neurophysiological and behavioral responses. Int J Vet Sci Med 2020; 8: (In review).

Mota-Rojas D, Broom DM, Orihuela A, Velarde A, Napolitano N, Alonso-Spilsbury M. Effects of human-animal relationship on animal productivity and welfare. J Anim Behav Biometeorol 2020; 8: 196-205. https://doi.org/10.31893/jabb.20026 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31893/jabb.20026

Bertoni A, Mota-Rojas D, Álvarez-Macias A, Mora-Medina P, Guerrero-Legarreta I, Morales-Canela A, et al. Scientific findings related to changes in vascular microcirculation using infrared thermography in the river buffalo. J Anim Behav Biometeorol 2020; 8: (Accepted). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31893/jabb.20038

Maharana BR, Kumar B, Prasad A, Patbandhan TK, Sudhakar NR, Joseph JP, et al. Prevalence and assessment of risk factors for haemoprotozoan infections in cattle and buffaloes of South-West Gujarat, India. Indian J Anim Res 2016; 50: 733-739. https://doi.org/10.18805/ijar.10268 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18805/ijar.10268

Benitez D, Cetrá B, Florin-Christensen M. Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus ticks can complete their life cycle on the water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis). J Buffalo Sci 2012; 1: 193-7. https://doi.org/10.6000/1927-520X.2012.01.02.11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.6000/1927-520X.2012.01.02.11

Desta, T. Introduction of domestic buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) into Ethiopia would be feasible. Renew. Agr Food Syst 2012; 27: 305-313. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742170511000366 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742170511000366

Paul SS, Das KS. Prediction of body weight from linear body measurements in Nili-Ravi buffalo calves. J Buffalo Sci 2012; 1: 32-4. https://doi.org/10.6000/1927-520X.2012.01.01.06 DOI: https://doi.org/10.6000/1927-520X.2012.01.01.06

Sarkar S, Hossain M, Amin M. Socio-economic status of buffalo farmers and the management practices of buffaloes in selected areas of Bagerhat District of Bangladesh. Bangladesh J Anim Sci 2013; 42: 158-164. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjas.v42i2.18505 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3329/bjas.v42i2.18505

Mota-Rojas D, Olmos-Hernández A, Verduzco-Mendoza A, Lecona-Butrón H, Martínez-Burnes J, Mora-Medina P, et al. Infrared thermal imaging associated with pain in laboratory animals. Experimental Animals 2020; 69: (Accepted). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1538/expanim.20-0052

Luigi Z. Influence of Seasonality on Buffalo Production. The Buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) Production and Research 2016; Chapter 8. pp. 196-224. https://doi.org/10.2174/9781681084176117010011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2174/9781681084176117010011

Mora-Medina P, Napolitano F, Mota-Rojas D, Berdugo J, Ruiz-Buitrago J, Guerrero-Legarreta I. Imprinting, Sucking and allosucking behaviors in buffalo calves. J Buffalo Sci 2018; 7: 49-57. https://doi.org/10.6000/1927-520X.2018.07.03.3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.6000/1927-520X.2018.07.03.3

Mora-Medina P, Berdugo-Gutiérrez J, Mota-Rojas D, Ruiz-Buitrago J, Nava AJ, Guerrero-Legarreta I. Behaviour and welfare of dairy buffaloes: pasture or confinement?. J Buffalo Sci 2018; 7: 43-48. https://doi.org/10.6000/1927-520X.2018.07.03.2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.6000/1927-520X.2018.07.03.2

McCool C. Buffalo and Bali cattle—Exploiting their reproductive behaviour and physiology. Trop. Anim. Health Prod 1992; 24: 165-172. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02359609 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02359609

Muñoz-Berrocal M, Tonhati H, Cerón-Muñoz M, Duarte JMC, Chabariberi RL. Uso de modelos lineares e não lineares para o estudo da curva de lactação em Búfalos Murrah e seus mestiços em sistema de criação semi extensivo, no Estado de São Paulo. Arch Latinoam Prod Anim 2005; 13: 19-23

Angulo RA, Noguera RR, Berdugo JA. El búfalo de agua (Bubalus bubalis) un eficiente utilizador de nutrientes: aspectos sobre fermentación y digestión ruminal. Livest Res Rural Dev 2005; 17: 67-71.

Tauqir NA, Shahzad MA, Nisa M, Sarwar M, Fayyaz M, Tipu MA. Response of growing buffalo calves to various energy and protein concentrations. Livest Sci 2011; 137: 66-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2010.10.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2010.10.003

Hamid MA, Zaman MA, Rahman A, Hossain KM. Buffalo Genetic Resources and their Conservation in Bangladesh. Res J Vet Sci 2017; 10: 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3923/rjvs.2017.1.13 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/rjvs.2017.1.13

Naveena BM, Kiran M. Buffalo meat quality, composition, and processing characteristics: contribution to the global eco-nomy and nutritional security. Anim Frontiers 2014; 18-24. https://doi.org/10.2527/af.2014-0029 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/af.2014-0029

NRC. 2001. Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. 7th ed. National Academies Press, Washington, DC 2001.

NRC. 2016. Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle 8th ed. National Academies Press, Washington, DC 2016.

Paul SS, Lal D. Nutrient requirements of buffaloes Azadpur- Dellhi: Satish Serial Publishing House 2010; 137.

Mendes AJ, Lima F. Aspectos nutricionales del búfalo. Tecnología en Marcha, SeDAFP y Universidad Popular de la Chontalpa 2011; 516: 105-120.

Kala A, Kamra DN, Kumar A, Agarwal N, Chaudhary LC, Joshi CG. Impact of levels of total digestible nutrients on microbiome, enzyme profile and degradation of feeds in buffalo rumen. PLoS ONE 2017; 12: e0172051. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172051 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172051

Giordano G, Guarini P, Ferrari P, Biondi-Zoccai G, Schiavone B, Giordano A. Beneficial impact on cardiovascular risk profile of water buffalo meat consumption. Eu J Clin Nutr 2010: 64: 1000-1006. https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2010.108 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2010.108

Ordovas JM, Ferguson LR, Tai ES, Mathers JC. Personalised nutrition and health. BMJ 2018; 361: k2173. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k2173 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k2173

USDA, 2015. National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference, Release 28.

Landi N, di Giuseppe AMA, Ragucci S, di Maro A, Free amino acid profile of Bubalus bubalis L. meat from the Campania region. Rev Brasil Zootec 2016; 45: 627-31. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-92902016001000008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-92902016001000008

Soria LA, Corva PM. Factores genéticos y ambientales que determinan la terneza de la carne bovina. Arch. Latinoam Prod Anim 2004; 12: 73-88

Giuffrida-Mendoza M, Arenas de Moreno L, Huerta-Leidenz N, Uzcategui-Bracho S, Valero-Leal K, Romero S, et al. Cholesterol and fatty acid composition of longissimus thoracis from water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) and Brahman-influenced cattle raised under savannah conditions. Meat Sci 2015; 106: 44-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2015.03.024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2015.03.024

Giuffrida-Mendoza M, Arenas-Moreno L, Huerta-Leidenz N, Uzcátegui-Bracho S, Hamid MA, Siddiky MNA, Rahman MA, Hossain KM. Scopes and opportunities of buffalo farming in Bangladesh a review. SAARC J Agri 2016; 14: 63-77. https://doi.org/10.3329/sja.v14i2.31246 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3329/sja.v14i2.31246

Kandeepan G, Mendiratta SK, Shukla V, Vishnura MR. Processing characteristics of buffalo meat- a review. J Meat Sci Technol 2013; 1: 1-9.

Di Luccia A, Satriani A, Barone CMA, Colatruglio P, Gigli S, Occidente M, et al. Effect of dietary energy content on the intramuscular fat depots and triglyceride composition of river buffalo meat. Meat Sci 2003; 65: 1379-1389. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(03)00060-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(03)00060-3

Faustman C, Yin S, Tatiyaborworntham N, Naveena BM. Oxidation and protection of red meat. Part1. In: E. Decker, R. Elias, and D.J. McClements, editors, Oxidation in foods and beverages and antioxidant applications: Management in different industry sectors. Volume 2. Woodhead Publishers, Cambridge, UK 2010; pp. 3-49. https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857090331.1.3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857090331.1.3

Bosques J, Pagán-Morales M, Casas A, Rivera A, Cianzio D. Segregation of polymorphisms in μ-calpain and calpastatin in beef cattle in Puerto Rico. J Agr U Puerto Rico 2015; 99: 105-116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46429/jaupr.v99i2.3026

Nuraini H, Mahmudah A, Winarto A, Sumantri C. Histomorphology and Physical Characteristics of Buffalo Meat at Different Sex and Age. Media Peternakan 2013; 4: 6-13. https://doi.org/10.5398/medpet.2013.36.1.6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5398/medpet.2013.36.1.6

Aminzare M, Hashemi M, Hassanzad Azar H, Hejazi J. The Use of Herbal Extracts and Essential Oils as a Potential

Antimicrobial in Meat and Meat Products: A Review. J Hum Environ Health Promot 2016; 1: 63-74. https://doi.org/10.29252/jhehp.1.2.63 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29252/jhehp.1.2.63

Nampanya S, Young J, Khounsy S, Bush R, Windsor P. Open access the food security challenge for the buffalo meat industry: perspectives from Lao PDR. J Buffalo Sci 2014; 3: 38-47. https://doi.org/10.6000/1927-520X.2014.03.02.2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.6000/1927-520X.2014.03.02.2

Hernández-Macedo, M. L., Barancelli, G. V., Contreras-Castillo, C. J. Microbial deterioration of vacuum-packaged chilled beef cuts and techniques for microbiota detection and characterization: a review. Braz J Microbiol 2011; 42: 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-83822011000100001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-83822011000100001

Manzoor A, HayatJaspal M, Yaqub T, UlHaq A, Nasir, J, Avais M, et al. Effect of lactic acid spray on microbial and quality parameters of buffalo meat. Meat Sci 2020; 159: 107923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2019.107923 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2019.107923

Biswas AK, Kondaiah N, Bheilegaonkar KN, Anjaneyulu AS, Mendiratta SK, Jana C. Microbial profiles of frozen trimmings and silver sides prepared at Indian buffalo meat packing plants. Meat Sci 2008; 80: 418e422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2008.01.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2008.01.004

Voloski FLS, Tonello L, Ramires T, Reta GG, Dewes C, Iglesias M, et al. Influence of cutting and deboning operations on the microbiological quality and shelf life of buffalo meat. Meat Sci 2016; 116: 207-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.02.020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.02.020

Rahimi E, Ameri M, Alimoradi M, Chakeri A, Bahrami AR. Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli isolated from raw camel, beef, and water buffalo meat in Iran. Com Clin Path 2013; 22: 467-473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00580-012-1434-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00580-012-1434-5

Juárez M, Failla S, Ficco A, Pen F, Avilés C, Polvillo O. Buffalo meat composition as affected by different cooking methods. Food Bioprod Proce 2010; 88: 145-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbp.2009.05.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbp.2009.05.001

Naveena BM, Vaithiyanathan S, Muthukumar M, Sen AR, Praveen-Kumar Y, Kiran M, et al., Relationship between the solubility, dosage and antioxidant capacity of carnosic acid in raw and cooked ground buffalo meat patties and chicken patties. Meat Sci 2013; 95: 195-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.04.043 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.04.043

Lantican FA, Molina MC, Lapitan JE, Padrid JC, Suñaz EC, Cañizares AR, et al. Buffalo Meat Value Chain Analysis in Luzon, Philippines. Department of Agriculture. Philippine Carabao Center. Searca 2017; p. 121.

Díaz-Gutiérrez C, WingChing-Jones R, Rosales-Rodríguez R. Factibilidad del establecimiento de un sistema de producción de engorde de búfalos en pastoreo. Agronomía Costarricense 2009; 33: 183-191.

Mane BG, Mendiratta SK, Tiwari AK, Bhilegaokar KN. Detection of adulteration of meat and meat products with buffalo meat employing polymerase chain reaction assay. Food Anal Methods 2012; 5: 296-300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-011-9237-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-011-9237-x

Kiran M, Naveena BM, Reddy KS, Shahikumar M, Reddy VR, Kulkarni V, Rapole S, More TH. Understanding tenderness variability and ageing changes in buffalo meat: biochemical, ultrastructural and proteome characterization. Animal 2016; 10: 1007-1015. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731115002931 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731115002931

Sentandreu M Á, Sentandreu E. Authenticity of meat products I: tools against fraud. Food Res Inter 2014; 60: 19-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2014.03.030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2014.03.030

Wang L, Hang X, Geng R. Molecular detection of adulteration in commercial buffalo meat products by multiplex PCR assay. Food Sci Technol 2019; 39: 344-348. https://doi.org/10.1590/fst.28717 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/fst.28717

Girish PS, Haunshi S, Vaithiyanathan S, Rajitha R, Ramakrishna C. A rapid method for authentication of Buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) meat by Alkaline Lysis method of DNA extraction and species specific polymerase chain reaction. J Food Sci Technol 2013; 50: 141-146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-011-0230-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-011-0230-6

Downloads

Published

2020-07-13

How to Cite

Cruz-Monterrosa, R. ., Mota-Rojas, D. ., Ramirez-Bribiesca, . E. ., Mora-Medina, P. ., & Guerrero-Legarreta, I. . (2020). Scientific Findings on the Quality of River Buffalo Meat and Prospects for Future Studies. Journal of Buffalo Science, 9, 170–180. https://doi.org/10.6000/1927-520X.2020.09.18

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)