Business Development Frameworks for Establishing Innovative Born-Global Firms in Nigeria and Sub-Sahara Africa

Authors

  • Patrick Oseloka Ezepue Statistics Information Modelling and Financial Mathematics Research Group, Department of Engineering and Mathematics, Sheffield Hallam University, UK
  • Nonso Ochinanwata Statistics Information Modelling and Financial Mathematics Research Group, Department of Engineering and Mathematics, Sheffield Hallam University, UK

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/2371-1647.2017.03.02

Keywords:

Born global-firms, Worldhero 3E.com, Afrimarket.com, Business development, Innovation, Dynamic capabilities, Entrepreneurship, Higher education, Economic development.

Abstract

This conceptual paper explores different approaches for establishing born-global firms (BGFs) in developed and developing countries, with a special focus on Nigeria and Sub-Sahara Africa. It reviews the key constructs and frameworks that underpin new business development in born-global firms. Examples of these constructs are business development, dynamic capabilities, innovation, collaboration, entrepreneurship, and organisational learning. The research is important because of the relative lack of BGFs (Google, Amazon, Alibaba, and Facebook, for example) in Sub-Sahara Africa, compared to other parts of the world. Moreover, the frameworks for BGF new business development can be applied in subtly different ways in developed and developing country contexts. For example, BGFs in developed countries focus on niche products and services with breakthrough innovation, whilst those in developing countries, because of limited resources and capabilities, focus on underserved and mass markets, which do not require high level resources and capabilities. Realistic hypothetical examples of BGFs which directly underpin Nigerian and Sub-Sahara African higher education and economic development are used to illustrate the BGF business development constructs.

References

Cavusgil TS, Knight G. Born Global Firms: A new international enterprise. New York, Business Expert Press, LLC 2009. https://doi.org/10.4128/9781606490136 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4128/9781606490136

Knight G, Cavusgil ST. Innovation, organisational, capabilities, and the born global firm. Journal of International Business Studies 2004; 35(2): 124-141. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400071 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400071

Zortea-Johnston E, Darroch J, Matear S. A Taxonomy of Born-global Firms. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal 2012; 8(2): 145-165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-011-0170-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-011-0170-7

Rennie M. Global competitiveness: born global. The Mckinsey Quarterly 1993; 4: 45-52.

Knight GA, Cavusgil ST. The Born Global Firm: A Challenge to Traditional Internationalization Theory', in Cavusgil ST, Madsen T, Eds. Advances in International Marketing, Vol. 8 JAI Press: Greenwich, CT. 1996; pp. 11-26.

Gleason K, Wiggengorn J. Born globals, the choice of global-isation strategy, and the market's perception of performance. Journal of World Business 2007; 42(3): 322-331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2007.04.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2007.04.007

Rialp A, Rialp J, Knight G. The phenomenon of early internationlising firms: what do we know after a decade (1993-2003) of scientific inquiry? International Business Review 2005; 14(2): 147-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2004.04.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2004.04.006

Rasmussen E, Madsen T, Evangelista F. The founding of the born global compnay in Denmark and Australia: Sensemaking and networking. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics 2001; 13(3): 75-107. https://doi.org/10.1108/13555850110764793 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/13555850110764793

Ezepue PO, Ochinanwata N. Integrated framework for establishing and financing start-ups in Nigeria: concepts and cases. Academic Papers and Abstracts of the 29th Small Enterprise Association of Australia and New Zealand (SEAANZ) Conference, Melbourne, 10-12 August 2016.

Ezepue PO, Ochinanwata N. Integrated Business Modelling for Innovation and Profitable Growth in Born-Global Firms: Critical Research Perspectives and Suitable Multi-methodology. Research Report of the Statistics Information Modelling and Financial Mathematics Research Group, Hallam University UK, 9 August 2015.

Ezepue PO. It Takes a Nation and a Continent: Achieving Higher Education Research-Teaching Excellence, Engaged Scholarship and High-Impact Socio-Economic Development in Nigeria and Africa. In Ezepue & Ekhaguere (Eds.) Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Mathematical and Statistical Finance, 1-3 September 2015, University of Ibadan, Nigeria, pp. 436-521. Publications of SIMFIM-WORLDHERO 3E-ICMCS Research Consortium: ISBN: 978-37246-5-7. 2016.

Ezepue PO, Ochinanwata N. Integrated framework for establishing and financing start-ups in Nigeria: concepts and cases. Academic Papers and Abstracts of the 29th Small Enterprise Association of Australia and New Zealand (SEAANZ) Conference, Melbourne, 10-12 August 2016.

Madsen T, Servais P. The internationlisation of born globals: An evolutionary process. International Business Review 1997; 6(1-14): 561-583. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-5931(97)00032-2

Madsen TK, Early and rapidly internationalizing ventures: Similarities and differences between classifications based on the original international new venture and born global literatures. Journal of International Entrepreneurship 2013; 11(1): 65-79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-012-0099-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-012-0099-0

Karra N, Phillips P, Tracey P. Building the born global firms: Developing entrepreneurial capabilities for international new ventures success. Long Range Planning 2008; 41(4): 440-458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2008.05.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2008.05.002

Ochinanwata N, Ezepue PO. Elements of business modelling for born-global firms: developing country perspectives, Academic Papers and Abstracts of the 29th Small Enterprise Association of Australia and New Zealand (SEAANZ) Conference, Melbourne, 10-12 August 2016.

Ibeh KIN, Kasem L. The network perspective and the internationalisation of small and medium size software firms from Syria. Industrial Marketing Management 2011; 40: 358-367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2010.08.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2010.08.004

Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A. Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Journal of Strategic Management 1997; 18(7): 509-533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z

Chesbrough HW. Why companies should have open business models. MIT Sloan Management Review 2007; 48(2): 22-28.

Teece DJ. Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal 2007; 28(13): 1319-1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640

Teece DJ. A dynamic capabilities-based entrepreneurial theory of the multinational enterprise. Journal of international Business Studies 2014; 45: 8-37. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2013.54 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2013.54

Freeman S, Edwards R, Scroder B. How smaller Born-Global Firms use networks and alliances to overcome constraints on rapid internationalisation. Journal of International Marketing 2006; 14(3): 33-63. https://doi.org/10.1509/jimk.14.3.33 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1509/jimk.14.3.33

Ciravegna L, Majano SB, Zhan G. The inception of internationalization of small and medium enterprises: The role of activeness and networks. Journal of Business Research 2014; 67(6): 1081-1089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.06.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.06.002

Zarei B, Nasseri B, Tajeddin M. Best practice network business model for internationlization of samll and medium enterprises. Journal of International Entrepreneurship 2011; 9: 299-315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-011-0080-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-011-0080-3

Pallotti F, Lomi A. Network influence and organisational performance: The effects of tie strength and structural equivalence. European Management Journal 2011; 29: 389-403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2011.02.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2011.02.005

Gulati R. Network location and learning: the influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation. Strategic management Journal 1999; 20: 397-420. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199905)20:5<397::AID-SMJ35>3.0.CO;2-K DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199905)20:5<397::AID-SMJ35>3.3.CO;2-B

Gates B. Business @ the Speed of Thought: Using a Digital Nervous System. Penguin 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8616.00097

Aldrich HE, Ruef M. Organisations evolving. 2nd Edition. Sage Publication, Thousand Oaks, California 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446212509

Johns G. The essential impact of context on organizational behaviour. Academy of Management Review 2006; 31(2): 386-408. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2006.20208687 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.20208687

Mowday RT, Sutton RI. Organisational behaviour: Linking individuals and groups to organisational contexts. Annual Review of Psychology 1993; 44: 195-229. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.44.020193.001211 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.44.1.195

Kafouros MI, Buckley PJ, Sharp JA, Wang C. The role of internationalization in explaining innovation performance. Technovation 2008; 28(1/2): 63-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2007.07.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2007.07.009

Filippetti A, Frenz M, Ietto-Gillies G. Are innovation and internationalization related? an analysis of European countries. Industry and Innovation 2011; 42(1): 56-75. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2011.583461 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2011.583461

Littunen H, Storhammar E, Nenonen T. The survival of firms over the critical first 3 years and the local environment. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 1998; 10(3): 189-202. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985629800000011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08985629800000011

Stalk G, Hout TM. Competing Against Time: How Time-based Competition is Reshaping Global Markets. NewYork, The Free Press 1990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.1990.11670646

Hansen MT, Birkinshaw J. The Innovation Value Chain. Harvard Business Review 2007; 85(6): 21-130.

Osterwalder A, Pigneur Y. Business model generation: A handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers. Hoboken, New Jersey, John Wiley and Sons, Inc. 2010.

Gulati R, Nohria N, Zaheer A. Strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal 2000; 21(3): 203-215. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<203::AID-SMJ102>3.0.CO;2-K DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<203::AID-SMJ102>3.0.CO;2-K

Sorensen HE. Business Development: A market Oriented Perspective. New York, John Wiley and Sons 2012.

Kim WC, Mauborgne R. Blue ocean strategy: How to create uncontested market space and make the competition irrelevant (Expanded edition). Harvard Business School 2015.

Bogers M. The open innovation paradox: knowledge sharing and protection in R&D collaborations. European Journal of Innovation Management 2011; 14(1): 93-117. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601061111104715 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14601061111104715

Majocchi A, Strange R. International Diversification: The Impact of Ownership Structure, the Market for Corporate Control and Board Independence. Management International Review 2012; 5(3): 880-990. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-012-0148-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-012-0148-x

Baldwin J, Yan B. Market expansion and productivity growth: do new domestic markets matter as much as new international markets? Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 2012; 21(2): 469-491. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9134.2012.00330.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2026497

Burgers JH, Bosch FA, Volberda HW. Why New Business Development Projects Fail: Coping with the Differences of Technological Versus Market Knowledge. Long Range Planning 2008; 41(1): 55-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2007.10.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2007.10.003

Ansoff HI. A Model for Diversification. Management Science 1958; 4(4): 392-414. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.4.4.392 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.4.4.392

Ansoff HI. Corporate strategy: an analytic approach to business policy for growth and expansion. McGraw-Hill 1965.

Sanchez R, Mahoney J. Modularity, Flexibility, and Knowledge Management in Product and Organization Design. Strategic Management Journal 1999; 19: 63-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171107

Gibson CB, Birkinshaw J. The antecedents, consequences and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal 2004; 47(2): 209-26. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159573 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/20159573

He ZL, Wong PK. Exploration v. exploitation: an empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science 2004; 15(4): 481-94. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0078 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0078

Sorrentino M, Williams L. Relatedness and corporate venturing: Doe it really matter? Journal of Business Venturing 1995; 10(1): 59-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(94)00007-H DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(94)00007-H

Schindehutte M, Morris MH, Kuratko DF. Triggering events, corporate entrepreneurship and the marketing function. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 2000; 8(2): 8-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/10696679.2000.11501865 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10696679.2000.11501865

Burgelman RA. Managing the new venture division: research findings and implications for strategic. Strategic Management Journal 1985; 6(1): 39-54. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250060104 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250060104

Chesbrough H. Designing corporate ventures in the shadow of private venture capital. California Management Review 2000; 42(3): 31-49. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166041 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/41166041

Haynie JM, Shepherd DA, Mcmullen JS. An opportunity for me? The role of resources in opportunity evaluation decisions. Journal of Management Studies 2009; 46(3): 337-361. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00824.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00824.x

Hitt MA, Ireland DR, Sirmon DG, Trahms CA. Strategic entrepreneurship: Creating value for individuals, organizations, and society. Academy of Management Perspectives 2011; 25(2): 57-75. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMP.2011.61020802 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/AMP.2011.61020802

Kumar N, Scheer L, Kotler P. From market driven to market driving. European Management Journal 2000; 18(2): 129-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-2373(99)00084-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-2373(99)00084-5

Nelson RR, Winter SG. An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, Massachustts, Harvard University Press 1982.

Schumpeter J. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, Harper & Brothers Publishers: New York 1942.

Grant RM, Baden-Fuller C. A Knowledge Accessing Theory of Strategic Alliances. Journal of Management Studies 2004; 41(1): 61-84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00421.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00421.x

Capron L, Mitchell W. Selection Capability: How Capability Gaps and Internal Social Frictions Affect Internal and External Strategic Renewal. Organisation Science 2009; 20(2): 294-312. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0328 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0328

Freeman J, Caroll GR, Hannan MT. The Liability of Newness: Age Dependence in Organisational Death Rates. America Sociological Review 1983; 48(5): 692-710. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094928

Bruderl F, Schussler R. Organizational Mortality: The Liabilities of Newness and Adolescence. Administrative Science Quarterly 1990; 35(3): 530-547. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393316 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2393316

Freeman J, Caroll GR, Hannan MT. The Liability of Newness: Age Dependence in Organsiational Death Rates. America Sociological Review 1983; 48(5): 692-710. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094928 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2094928

Stinchcombe AL. Social Structure and Organizations. In: March JG, (Ed.), Handbook of Organizations Chicago, IL: Rand McNally & Company 1965; pp. 142-193.

Ozcan P, Eisenhardt KM. Origin of alliance portfolios:entrepreneurs, network strategies, and firm performance. Academy of Management Journal 2009; 52(2): 246-279. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2009.37308021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.37308021

Abor J, Adjasi CKD, Hayford M-C. How does foreign direct investment affect the export decisions of firms in Ghana? African Development Review 2008; 20: 446-465. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8268.2008.00193.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8268.2008.00193.x

Rankin N. Export behavior of South African manufacturing firms. Trade and Industry Policy Secretariat (TIPS) Working Paper 5, Centre for the Study of African Economies, University of Oxford 2004.

Roberts SJ, Thoburn JT. Adjusting to trade liberalisation: The case of firms in the South African textile sector. Journal of African Economies 2003; 12(1): 74-103. https://doi.org/10.1093/jae/12.1.74 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jae/12.1.74

Zahara SA, Ucbasaran D, Newey LR. Social knowledge and SMEs' innovative gains from internationalization. European Management Review 2009; 6(2): 81-93. https://doi.org/10.1057/emr.2009.6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/emr.2009.6

Mumford MD. Managing Creative People: Strategies and Tactics for Innovation. Human Resource Management Review 2000; 10(3): 313-351. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-4822(99)00043-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-4822(99)00043-1

Downloads

Published

2017-03-01

How to Cite

Ezepue, P. O., & Ochinanwata, N. (2017). Business Development Frameworks for Establishing Innovative Born-Global Firms in Nigeria and Sub-Sahara Africa. Journal of Advances in Management Sciences & Information Systems, 3, 9–26. https://doi.org/10.6000/2371-1647.2017.03.02

Issue

Section

Articles