The Spatial Characteristics of Homes as Private Domains that May Promote Youth Offending

Thozama Mandisa Lutya

doi:10.6000/1929-4409.2012.01.20

Authors

Thozama Mandisa Lutya Department of Social Work and Criminology, Faculty of Humanities, University of Pretoria, Hatfield Campus, Cnr Lynwood and Roper Streets, Pretoria, 0002, South Africa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2012.01.20

Keywords:

Home, private domain/space, youth offending, parental behaviour, learning, home and family characteristics

Abstract

This a review analysis concerned with describing the spatial characteristics of homes as private domains that may promote youth offending. The goal of this paper is to explicate such characteristics and relate them to the development of a young criminal personality. The main point is that the manner in which homes are structured and family processes are conducted could give children many opportunities to learn criminal behaviour without interruption. The geographical themes of space, time and culture are used to explicate the characteristics of the home as a private space. Research results from reviewed articles have given this paper three structured sections. The first session briefly defines and describes the home as a private space. Section 2 critically discusses the hidden dimensions of the home as a private space. The family is identified as a site of authentic experience, ownership and secrecy, commitment and an obligation to shared values, as well as voluntary compassion. The home is shown to be a territory of respect and recognition, but it is also argued that, under particular circumstances, these characteristics of the home could influence or allow children to learn criminal behaviour. The last section of the paper focuses on factors in the home that influence children to replicate negative parental behaviour, although it is acknowledged that most parents do not consciously wish their children to learn non-conforming behaviour in their homes, and that not all children exposed to concealed negative home characteristics will commit a crime. It is suggested that crime prevention efforts should start with the interrogation and mediation of home and family characteristics that could influence children to learn criminal behaviour.

References

Bailey, Joe. 2000. ‘Some meanings of “the private” in sociological thought’, Sociology 4(3): 381-401. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0038038500000250

Blomley, Nicholas. 2005. ‘Flowers in the bathtub: boundary crossings at the public-private’, Geoforum 36: 281-296. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2004.08.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2004.08.005

Cater, Asa, K. 2004. ‘Negotiating normality and deviation - father’s violence against mother from children’s perspective’, Orebro University: Orebro

Cowburn, Malcom and Dominelli, Lena. 2001. ‘Masking hegemonic masculinity: reconstructing the paedophile as dangerous stranger’, British Journal of Social Work 31: 399-415. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/31.3.399 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/31.3.399

Cunningham, Alison and Baker, Linda. 2004. What about me: seeking to understand a child’s view of violence in the family. Centre for Children & Families in the Justice System of the London Family Court, London.

Drummond, Lisa. 2000. ‘Street scenes: practices of public and private space in urban Vietnam’, Urban Studies 37(12): 2377-2391. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00420980020002850 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980020002850

Farrington, David, P, and Smith, Carolyn, A. 2004. ‘Continuities in anti-social behaviour and parenting across three generations’, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 45(2): 230-247. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00216.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00216.x

Hasanbegovic, Claudia. 1999. ‘The feminine is political: domestic violence and its similarities with torture’, Canterbury: University of Kent.

Johnson, Jeffrey, L. 1992. ‘A theory of the nature and value of privacy’, Public Affairs Quarterly 6(3): 271-288.

Koskela, Hille. 1999. “Gendered exclusions”: women’s fear of violence and changing relations to space’, Geografiska Annaler 81(B): 111-124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0467.00067

Koskela, Hille, and Pain, Rachel. 2000. ‘Revisiting fear and place: women’s fear of attack and the built environment’, Geoforum 31: 269-280. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7185(99)00033-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7185(99)00033-0

Lohan, Maria, 2000. ‘Comeback public/private: (almost) all is forgiven: using feminist methodologies in researching information communication technologies’, Women’s Studies International Forum 23(1): 107-117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0277-5395(99)00094-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-5395(99)00094-1

Lave, Jean. 1996. 'Teaching as learning in practice', Mind, Culture and Activity 3(3): 149-164. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327884mca0303_2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327884mca0303_2

Lucas, Susan and Purkayastha, Bandana. 2007. ‘“Where is home?” Here and there: transnational experiences of home among Canadian migrants in the United States’, GeoJournal 68: 243-251. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10708-007-9073-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-007-9073-0

Maree, Alice. 2008. ‘Criminogenic risk factors for youth offenders’, in Bezuidenhout, C. and Joubert, S. (eds): Child and Youth

Misbehaviour in South Africa: A holistic Approach. Van Schaik, Pretoria, pp. 55-91.

Massey, Deborah. 1999. ‘Space-time science and the relationship between physical geography and human geography’, Transactions, Institute of British Geographers NS 24: 261-276. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0020-2754.1999.00261.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0020-2754.1999.00261.x

Massey, Deborah. 2004. ‘Geographies of responsibility’, Geografiska Annaler 86(B 1): 5-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0435-3684.2004.00150.x

Milligan, Christine, Atkinson, Sarah, Skinner, Mark and Wiles, Janine. 2007. ‘Geographies of care: a commentary’, New Zealand Geographer 63(2): 135-140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-7939.2007.00101.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-7939.2007.00101.x

Moor, James, H. 1997. ‘Towards a theory of privacy in the information age’, Computers and Society, 27(3): 27-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/270858.270866 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/270858.270866

Nissenbaum, Helen. 1998. ‘Protecting privacy in an information age: the problem of privacy in public’, Law and Philosophy 17: 559-596. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3505189

Pain, Rachel. 2001. ‘Gender, race, age and fear in the city’, Urban Studies 38(5): 89-913. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00420980120046590 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980120046590

Peet, Richard. 1998. Modern geographical thought. Blackwell, Oxford.

Pred, Allan. 1981. ‘Social reproduction and time- geography of everyday life’, Geographica Annaler: Series B Human Geography 89(1): 5-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/490994 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/490994

Reingardiene, Jolanta. 2003. ‘Dilemmas in private/public discourse: contexts for gender based violence against women in Lithuania’, Journal of Baltic Studies 34(3): 354-368. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01629770300000131 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01629770300000131

Schwanen, Tim. 2007: ‘Matters of interest: artefacts, spacing and timing’, Geografiska Annaler 89(B 1): 9-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0467.2007.00236.x

Stanley, Nicky. 1996. ‘Domestic violence and child abuse: developing social work practice’, Child and Family Social Work 2: 135-145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2206.1997.00052.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2206.1997.00052.x

Strahilevitz, Lior, J. 2005. ‘A social networks theory of privacy’, American Law and Economics Association Annual Meeting, Paper 42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.629283