Understanding the Decision-Making Process of Women to Engage in Cohabiting Relationships
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2022.11.04Keywords:
Cohabitation, marriage, termination, social work, women empowermentAbstract
Despite the extensive literature on cohabitation, there is scant literature that explores women’s decisions to engage in cohabitation. Drawing on the theory of planned behaviour and a qualitative research approach, this article explores the decision-making processes among women to engage in cohabitation. For some women, cohabitation was preceded by a clear conversation about the intention to marry. The second group of women described cohabitation as an expression of autonomy and independence by rejecting traditionally prescribed conventions such as marriage. When the promise of marriage fails to materialise, some women become increasingly disillusioned and opt to terminate their co-residence relationships in order to negotiate marriage as an option with their partners. This article utilised purposively and snowball sampling to gather data and this was through semi-structured interviews. This data was analysed thematically, and the results show a preponderance of a desire for autonomy that is checked by the harsh persistence of disempowering narratives. Further research is needed to establish patterns of autonomy in cohabiting partners.
References
Adjei, S. B. (2015). Assessing women empowerment in Africa: A critical review of the challenges of the gender empowerment measure of the UNDP. Psychology and Developing Societies, 27(1), 58-80. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971333614564740 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0971333614564740
Agadjanian, V., & Hayford, S. R. (2018). Men’s migration, women’s autonomy, and union dissolution in rural Mozambique. Journal of Family Issues, 39(5), 1236-1257. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X17698184 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X17698184
Allendorf, K., Thornton, A., Mitchell, C., & Young-DeMarco, L. (2019). The influence of developmental idealism on marital attitudes, expectations, and timing. Journal of Family Issues, 40(17), 2359-2388. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X19856642 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X19856642
Andersson, L. (2016). Gender, family life course and attitudes towards divorce in Sweden. Acta sociologica, 59(1), 51-67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699315615639 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699315615639
Bogopa, D. (2010). Health and ancestors: The case of South Africa and beyond. Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology, 10:1-7. https://doi.org/10.2989/IPJP.2010.10.1.8.1080 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2989/IPJP.2010.10.1.8.1080
Bowie, L. D., & Kenney, N. E. (2013). The Invisible Woman: The Status of and Challenges Facing Black Women. Preface. The Review of Black Political Economy, 40(1), 5-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12114-012-9137-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12114-012-9137-3
Brown, S., Manning, W.D. & Payne, K.K. (2015). Relationship quality among cohabiting versus married couples. Journal of Family Issues, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X15622236 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X15622236
Chaney, C. & Fairfax, C.N. (2012). A change has come: The Obamas and the culture of black marriage in America. Ethnicities, 13(1):20-48. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468796812463546 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1468796812463546
Church, J. (2015). Culture beyond identity: J.G. Herder on the purpose and justification of culture. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 41(8):791-809. https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453714564454 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453714564454
Chinwuba, N.N. (2010). Cohabitation: Human dignity and one aspect of gender insensitivity. The International Journal of Human Rights, 14(4):624-634. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642980903534360 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13642980903534360
Cho, S. B., Cui, M., & Claridge, A. M. (2018). Cohabiting parents’ marriage plans and marriage realization: Gender differences, couple agreement, and longitudinal effects. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 35(2), 137-158. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407516678485 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407516678485
Creswell, J.W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Creswell, J.W. (2016). 30 Essential skills for the qualitative researcher. London: SAGE.
Eddosary, M., Ko, Y. J., Sagas, M., & Kim, H. Y. (2015). Consumers' intention to attend soccer events: Application and extension of the theory of planned behaviour. Psychological reports, 117(1), 89-102. https://doi.org/10.2466/01.05.PR0.117c13z7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2466/01.05.PR0.117c13z7
Funk, L.M. & Kobayashi, K.M. (2014). From motivations to accounts: An interpretive analysis of “living apart together” relationships in mid- to later-life couples. Journal of Family Issues, 37(8) 1101–1122. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X14529432 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X14529432
Gold, J.M. (2012). Typologies of cohabitation: Implications for clinical practice and research. The Family Journal: Counselling and Therapy for Couples and Families, 20(3):315-321. https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480712449603 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480712449603
Gassen, N.S. & Perelli-Harris, B. (2015). The increase in cohabitation and the role of union status in family policies: A comparison of 12 European countries. Journal of European Social Policy, 25(4):431-449. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928715594561 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928715594561
Grove, S., Burns, N. & Gray, J. (2012). The practice of nursing research. 7th ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier.
Guizzardi, L. (2011). ‘Would you like to present me with a piece of your wardrobe?’ The fortuitous reasons for cohabiting. International Review of Sociology, 21(3), 495-511. https://doi.org/10.1080/03906701.2011.625657 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03906701.2011.625657
Guzzo, K. B. (2009). Marital intentions and the stability of first cohabitations. Journal of Family Issues, 30(2):179-205. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X08323694 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X08323694
Han, H. & Kim, Y. (2010). An investigation of green hotel customers’ decision formation: Developing an extended model of the theory of planned behaviour. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 29:659-668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2010.01.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2010.01.001
Harris, L. E. (2020). Committing Before Cohabiting: Pathways to Marriage among Middle-Class Couples. Journal of Family Issues, 0192513X20957049. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X20957049 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X20957049
Hatch, A. (2015). Saying “I don’t” to matrimony: An investigation of why long-term heterosexual cohabitors choose not to marry. Journal of Family Issues, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X15576200 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X15576200
He, J., Wan, L., & Luo, B. (2019). Intentions and influencing factors regarding natural childbirth among urban pregnant women in China, based on the theory of reasoned action and structural equation modelling. Journal of International Medical Research, 47(9), 4482-4491. https://doi.org/10.1177/0300060519862089 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0300060519862089
Hung, S. L. (2020). Chinese women revising meanings of marriage and divorce: Comparing women who divorced in the 1990s and 2000s. International Social Work, 0020872820920339. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872820920339 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872820920339
Hughes, J. (2015). The decentering of couple relationships? An examination of young adults living alone. Journal of Sociology, 51(3):707-721. https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783314527656 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783314527656
Hsu, C. H., & Huang, S. (2012). An extension of the theory of planned behaviour model for tourists. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 36(3), 390-417. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096348010390817 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1096348010390817
Isaid, E. N., & Faisal, M. N. (2015). Consumers’ repurchase intention towards a mobile phone brand in Qatar: An exploratory study utilizing theory of reasoned action framework. Global Business Review, 16(4), 594-608. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150915581104 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150915581104
Jozkowski, K. N., & Geshnizjani, A. (2016). Using a reasoned action approach to examine US college women’s intention to get the HPV vaccine. Health Education Journal, 75(1), 14-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0017896914561100 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0017896914561100
Kasearu, K. (2010). Intending to marry: Students’ behavioural intention towards family forming. Trames, 14(64):3-20. https://doi.org/10.3176/tr.2010.1.01 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3176/tr.2010.1.01
Kim, H. J., Atteraya, M. S., & Yoo, H. Y. (2019). Women’s agency freedom through empowerment against domestic violence: Evidence from Nepal. International Social Work, 62(3), 1088-1103. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872818767255 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872818767255
Lailulo, Y., Sathiya Susuman, A., & Blignaut, R. (2017). Improving maternal and reproductive health in Ethiopia. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 52(7), 947-964. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021909615623810 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0021909615623810
Lauer, S. & Yodanis, C. (2010). The deinstitutionalization of marriage revisited: A new institutional approach to marriage. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 2:58-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2589.2010.00039.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2589.2010.00039.x
Martignani, L. (2011). ‘All together now!’: Couples and the ontological problem of cohabitation as a form of life. International Review of Sociology, (21)3:565-581. https://doi.org/10.1080/03906701.2011.625665 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03906701.2011.625665
Martínez, P.R. & Khalil, H. (2012). Battery and development: Exploring the link between intimate partner violence and modernization. Cross-Cultural Research, 47(3):231-267. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397112463329 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397112463329
Mawere, M. & Mawere, A.M. (2010). The changing philosophy of African marriage: The relevance of the Shona customary marriage practice of Kukumbira. Journal of African Studies and Development, 2(9):224-233.
Maniotes, C. R., Ogolsky, B. G., & Hardesty, J. L. (2020). Destination marriage? The diagnostic role of rituals in dating relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 37(12), 3102-3122. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407520952166 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407520952166
Moors, G. & Bernhardt, E. (2009). Splitting up or getting married? Competing risk analysis of transitions among cohabiting couples in Sweden. Acta Sociologica, 52(3):227-247. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699309339800 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699309339800
Miller, A.J. & Sassler, S. (2012). The construction of gender among working-class cohabiting couples. Qualitative Sociology, 35:427-446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-012-9234-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-012-9234-4
Mishra, S. (2015). Health revolution: Paving way for empowering rural women in India. Journal of Health Management, 17(4), 395-406. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972063415605992 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0972063415605992
Muberekwa, E., & Nkomo, T. (2016). Exploring the perceptions of Wits academic women about women empowerment and the changing roles of women in 21st-century South Africa. SAGE Open, 6(4), 2158244016675014. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016675014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016675014
Murrow, C. & Shi, L. (2010). The Influence of cohabitation purposes on relationship quality: An examination in dimensions. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 38:397-412. https://doi.org/10.1080/01926187.2010.513916 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01926187.2010.513916
Posel, D. & Rudwick, S. (2014). Ukukipita (Cohabiting): Socio-cultural constraints in urban Zulu society. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 49(3) 282-297. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021909613485705 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0021909613485705
Van der Vliet, V. (2007). Traditional husbands, modern wives? African Studies, 50(1):219-241. https://doi.org/10.1080/00020189108707743 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00020189108707743
Reid, M. & Golub, A. (2015). Vetting and letting: Cohabiting stepfamily formation processes in low-income black families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77:1234-1249. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12217 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12217
Reinhold, S. (2010). Reassessing the link between premarital cohabitation and marital instability. Demography, 47(3):719-733. https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.0.0122 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.0.0122
Ries, F., Hein, V., Pihu, M. & Armenta, J.M. (2012). Self-identity as a component of the theory of planned behaviour in predicting physical activity. European Physical Education Review, 18(3):322-334. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X12450792 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X12450792
Roberson, P.N.E., Norona, J.C., Fish, J.N., Olmstead, S.B. & Fincham, F. (2016). Do differences matter? A typology of emerging adult romantic relationship. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407516661589 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407516661589
Rodriguez, J. O., Palencia, E. P., & Lagunas, E. A. (2018). The effect of different forms of violence on women’s attitudes toward gender equality and decision-making capacity. Affilia, 33(2), 193-207. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886109917738744 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0886109917738744
Rowan, K., Mumford, E., & Clark, C. J. (2018). Is women’s empowerment associated with help-seeking for spousal violence in India? Journal of interpersonal violence, 33(9), 1519-1548. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515618945 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515618945
Salem, R. (2018). Matrimonial expenditures and Egyptian women’s power within marriage. Journal of Family Issues, 39(9), 2615-2638. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X18755197 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X18755197
Saul, G., Diarra, A., Melnikas, A. J., & Amin, S. (2021). Voice Without Choice? Investigating Adolescent Girls’ Agency in Marital Decision-making in Niger. Progress in Development Studies, 1464993420977801. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464993420977801 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1464993420977801
Shulman, S. & Connolly, J. (2013). The challenge of romantic relationships in emerging adulthood: Reconceptualization of the field. Emerging Adulthood, 1(1):27-39. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696812467330 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696812467330
Smith, J.F.N. (2014). Same-sex marriage attitudes during the transition to early adulthood: A panel study of young Australians, 2008 to 2013. Journal of Family Issues, 1-26.
Smock, P.J. & Kroeger, R. (2015). Cohabitation. United States. Oxford: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.31081-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.31081-9
Soulsby, L.K. & Bennett, K.M. (2015). When two become one: Exploring identity in marriage and cohabitation. Journal of Family Issues, 1-23.
Stavrova, O., Fetchenhauer, D. & Schlösser, T. (2012). Cohabitation, gender, and happiness: A cross-cultural study in thirty countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43(7):1063-1081. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022111419030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022111419030
Stoddard, S. A., & Pierce, J. (2018). Alcohol and marijuana use and intentions among adolescents: The role of the reasoned action approach and positive future orientation. Youth & Society, 50(6), 758-779. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X16671610 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X16671610
Tornikoski, E., & Maalaoui, A. (2019). Critical reflections–The Theory of Planned Behaviour: An interview with Icek Ajzen with implications for entrepreneurship research. International Small Business Journal, 37(5), 536-550. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242619829681 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242619829681
Wang, Z., Lou, Y., & Zhou, Y. (2020). Bargaining Power or Specialization? Determinants of Household Decision-Making in Chinese Rural Migrant Families. SAGE Open, 10(4), 2158244020980446. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020980446 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020980446
Wong, S. H., & Chow, A. Y. M. (2017). An exploratory study on university students’ perceptions of posthumous organ donation based on the theory of reasoned action. OMEGA-Journal of Death and Dying, 75(3), 284-299. https://doi.org/10.1177/0030222816633241 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0030222816633241
Zito, R.C. (2015). Family structure history and teenage cohabitation: Instability, socioeconomic disadvantage, or transmission? Journal of Family Issues, 36(3):299-325. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X13490933 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X13490933
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Policy for Journals/Articles with Open Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work
Policy for Journals / Manuscript with Paid Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Publisher retain copyright .
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work .