An Analysis of Public Order Policing in the Gauteng Province, South Africa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2021.10.152Keywords:
Protests, crowd management, restoration of public order, riots, public order policing, violenceAbstract
Background: Public order policing (POP) has attracted considerable interest from the academic community due to public protests in South Africa. This is not surprising given that it represents an important component of police work. As South Africa’s democracy has been maturing, the democratic dispensation brought the promise of civil liberties and a human rights culture. Although these parallel developments brought prospects of accountability and legitimacy by the South African Police Service (SAPS), the restoration of public order, especially during public protests, has remained a challenge for the SAPS.
Purpose: The objectives of this research were threefold: to explore the role of the POP unit; to explore its capacity to respond to public protests; and to determine the effectiveness of the integrated interventions of the relevant stakeholders to restore engagement and order.
Methods: A qualitative research approach employing semi-structured interviews was utilised. To understand the policing of public protests, purposeful sampling was utilised to select 25 participants comprising community members, municipal officials, and POP members. These participants were selected since they are directly involved either in responding to public order or being part of protests, and it was therefore envisaged that their contribution would assist in understanding how protests are responded to.
Conclusion: The findings indicate that when the POP units that are mandated to fulfil these goals are not effective, disruptions of public order are minimised and the destructive consequences of those that do occur are contained. The results illustrate that the restoration of public order necessitates regenerating public order characterised by low expectations of violence and a heightened respect for human rights.
Recommendations: This article recommends that the relevant stakeholders in collaboration with the POP unit must respond adequately to the maintenance of safety and security during protests. The relevant stakeholders and the POP unit should enhance the effectiveness of the current strategies to be able to deal with anticipated public violence and disorder, improvement of the intelligence-gathering process to plan properly, adequate and proper training facilities, reviewing and updating of training manuals, and methods based on lessons learned and best practices to ensure that the training is relevant. POP members must undergo regular training and in-service training to maintain their fitness levels, standards, proficiency, and competencies.
References
Albrecht, J.F., Dow, M.C., Plecas, D. and Das, D.K. 2015. Policing Major Events. Boca Raton: CRC. https://doi.org/10.1201/b17692
Alexander, P., Runciman, C. and Maruping, B. 2015. South African Police Service Data on Crime Incidents: Preliminary Analysis. Johannesburg: Social Change Research Unit, University of Johannesburg. https://doi.org/10.17159/2413-3108/2016/v0n58a1513
Alexander, P., Runciman, C. and Maruping, B. 2016. “South Africa’s Incident Registration Information System (IRIS): Its Use and Abuse in Protest Analysis.” SA Crime Quarterly 58:9-21.
Bernard, T.J., Paoline, E.A. and Pare, P.P. 2005. “General Systems Theory and Criminal Justice.” Journal of Criminal Justice 33:203-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2005.02.001
Bruce, D. 2016. “Public Order Transparency: Using Freedom of Information Laws to Analyse the Policing of Protest.” SA Crime Quarterly 58: 2413-3108. https://doi.org/10.17159/2413-3108/2016/v0n58a1508
Buch, M.N. 2012. Maintenance of Public Order. Retrieved 12 July, 2019 (https://www.vifindia.org/print/1307?via=at).
Clarke, V. and Braun, V. 2013. “Teaching Thematic Analysis: Overcoming Challenges and Developing Strategies for Effective Learning.” The Psychologist 26(2):120-23.
Conklin, J.E. 1992. Criminology. 4th ed. New York: MacMillan.
De Lint, W. 2005. “Public Order Policing: A Tough Act to Follow?” International Journal of the Sociology of Law 33(4):179-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsl.2005.08.001
Della Porta, D. and Reiter, H. 1998. Policing Protest: The Control of Mass Demonstrations in Western Democracies. https://doi.org/10.5749/j.ctttv1tv
Drury, J. and Winter, G. 2003. “Social Identity as a Source of Strength in Mass Emergencies and Other Crowd Events.” International Journal of Mental Health 32(4):77-93. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207411.2003.11449599
Elliot, R. and Nicholls, J. 1996. It’s Good to Talk: Lessons in Public Consultation and Feedback. London: Police Research Group.
Farlam Commission of Inquiry. 2015. Farlam Commission of Inquiry Report. Retrieved 22 April, 2020 (http://sd-report.lonmin.com/2015/pdf/Farlam_Commission_of_Inquiry_Report.pdf).
Hart, J.M. 1996. “The Management of Change in Police Organizations.” Pp. 199-217 in Policing in Central and Eastern Europe: Comparing First-hand Knowledge With Experience From the West (Part IV), edited by M. Pagon. Ljubljana, Slovenia: College of Police and Security Studies.
Herbert, S. 2006. “Tangled up in Blue: Conflicting Paths to Police Legitimacy.” Theoretical Criminology 10(4): 481-504. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480606068875
Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary (HMIC). 2009. Adapting to Protest: Nurturing the British Model of Policing. London: HMIC.
Hoggett, J. and Stott, C. 2010. “The Role of Crowd Theory in Determining the Use of Force in Public Order Policing.” Policing and Society 20(2):223-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439461003668468
Jefferson, T. 1990. “The Case against Paramilitary Policing.” The British Journal of Criminology 33(1):325-52.
Jones, T. and Newburn, T. 2001. Widening Access: Improving Police Relations with Hard-to-Reach Groups. London: Police Research Group.
King, M. and Waddington, D. 2004. “Flashpoints Revisited: A Critical Application to the Policing of Anti-Globalization Protest.” Policing and Society, 15(3):255-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439460500168584
Lawes, A. 1993. Management Skills for the Information Manager. Vermont: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
Marikana Commission of Inquiry. 2015. National and International Concern Arising out of the Tragic Incidents at the Lonmin Mine in Marikana in the North West Province. Retrieved 15 May, 2021 (http://www.sahrc.org.za/ home/21/files/marikana-report-1.pdf).
Marks, M. and Bruce, D. 2014. “Groundhog Day? Public Order Policing Twenty Years into Democracy.” South African Journal of Criminal Justice 27(3):346-76, 362-68.
Masiloane, D. and Pillay, D. 2017. “The policing of public protests in South Africa with specific reference to the Free State province.” Acta Criminologica: Southern African Journal of Criminology 30(2):128-46.
Mccarthy, J. and Mcphail, C. 1998. When Riot Cops are not Enough: The Policing and Repression of the Occupy Oakland Movement. New Jersey: Rutgers University.
Mofokeng, J.T. 2018. “A Critical Analysis of the South African Police Service’s Management of Civil Protests.” International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanity Studies 10(1):133-49.
Montesh, M. 2012. “Police Brutality and the Policing of Public Gatherings in South Africa.” All Africa Criminal Justice Society 2012:170-204. https://doi.org/10.5787/40-1-985
Montesh, M. and Basdeo, V. 2012. “The Role of the South African National Defence Force in Policing.” Scientia Militaria, South African Journal of Military Studies 40(1):71-94.
Mthethwa, N. 2011. New Policy on Policing Public Order Protests – Ministry. Retrieved 12 July, 2019 (http://www.politicsweb. co.za/party/new-policy-on-policing-public-order-protests—mini).
Pillay, D. 2016. “An Analysis of the Policing of Service Delivery Protests in the Free State.” Master’s thesis, University of South Africa, Pretoria.
Reicher, S. 1996. The Psychology of Crowd Dynamics. Retrieved 13 February, 2019 (https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/2ed1/ dacbd7177d6c1709dda3a8254e7e58a6d1af.pdf).
Reisman, W.M. 1995. Institutions and Practices for Restoring and Maintaining Public Order. Retrieved 12 July, 2020 (https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1363&context=djcil).
Republic Of South Africa (RSA). 1977. The Criminal Procedure Act, No. 51 of 1977. Pretoria: Government Printers.
Republic Of South Africa (RSA). 1995. The South African Police Services (SAPS) Act, No. 68 of 1995. Pretoria: Government Printers.
Republic Of South Africa (RSA). 1996. Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, Act 108 of 1996. Pretoria: Government Printers.
Republic Of South Africa (RSA). 2013. The Dangerous Weapons Act, No. 15 of 2013. Pretoria: Government Printers.
Roelofse, C.J. 2012. “A Critical Assessment of the Constitutional Mandate of the South African Police Service in Accordance with Criminological Perspective on Crime Prevention.” Acta Criminologica 23(2):42-60.
Samad, S.A. 2009. “Non-violence in the Civil Rights Movement in the United States of America.” Unpublished thesis, Free University, Berlin.
Shane, J.M. 2010. “Organisational Stressors and Police Performance.” Journal of Criminal Justice 38(4):807-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2010.05.008
Sheptycki, J. 2002. “Accountability Across the Policing Field: Towards a General Cartography of Accountability for Post-Modern Policing.” Policing and Society 12(4):323-38. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439460220000055
South African Civilian Secretariat for Police 2016. White Paper on Policing. Pretoria: South Africa.
South African Police Service (SAPS). 2013. SAPS Act Standing Order 2013: Media Communication in the South African Police Service. Pretoria: SAPS.
South African Police Service (SAPS). 2015. SAPS Annual Report 2014-2015. Pretoria: Government Printer.
Stott, C. and Geoff, P. 2013. Public Order Policing: Evidence Review. Retrieved 12 July, 2020 (https://www.n8research.org.uk/ media/PublicOrder_Evidence-Review.pdf).
Stott, C. and Pearson, G. 2007. Football ‘Hooliganism’, Policing and the War on the ‘English Disease’. London: Pennant Books.
Wa Afrika, M. & Hofstatter, S. 2015. “When Cops Stoop to Criminal Tactics.” Sunday Times, November 15, p. 8.
Waddington, D.P. 2007. Policing Public Disorder: Theory and Practice. Cullompton: Willan. https://doi.org/10.1093/police/pam057
Waddington, D.P. and King, M. 2005. “The Disorderly Crowd: From Classical Psychological Reductionism to Socio‐Contextual Theory – The Impact on Public Order Policing Strategies.” The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice 44(5):490-503. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2311.2005.00393.x
Waddington, P.A.J. 1987. “Towards Paramilitarism? Dilemmas in Policing Civil Disorder.” British Journal of Criminology 27:37-46. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjc.a047650
Waddington, P.A.J. 1991. Strong Arm of the Law: Armed and Public Order Policing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Waddington, P.A.J. 1993. “Dying in a Ditch: The Use of Police Powers in Public Order.” International Journal of the Sociology of Law 21:335-53.
Waddington, P.A.J. 1994. Liberty and Order: Public Order Policing in a Capital City. London: UCL Press.
United Nations 1991. National Peace Accord of 1991. Retrieved 12 July, 2020 (https://peacemaker.un.org/sites/peacemaker. un.org/files/ZA_910914_National%20Peace%20Accord.pdf).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Policy for Journals/Articles with Open Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work
Policy for Journals / Manuscript with Paid Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Publisher retain copyright .
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work .