A Paradigmatic Study to Legally Assess the Authority and Right of Jurisdiction of Public Sector Governance: Examining Discretion in Government Administrative Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2021.10.131Keywords:
Legal assessment, authority, public sector, governance, discretion, government administration.Abstract
This study aims to explore how government administration has so far been carried out within the authority framework of discretion owned by government agencies. This study uses a qualitative method with a descriptive normative analysis approach to obtain a paradigmatic study as a legal assessment to investigate the authority and right of jurisdiction of public sector governance. The focal point was to examine discretion in government administrative law as contained in Law No. 30 of 2014 about Government Administration. The results showed that as a freedom of thought and action in legalization, discretionary authority lies in the authority to carry out positions held by government administrative officials. The results also highlight that discretion is still rigid in its application in Indonesia because the procedure to perform this discretion is tiered. The theoretical implication revealed that the difference has led to controversy between scientific discretion and the discretion contained in the Law on Government Administration, decreasing public official’s willingness to do something for the benefit and welfare of society and seekers of justice.
References
Ansori, L. (2017). Diskresi Dan Pertanggungjawaban Pemerintah Dalam Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan. Jurnal Yuridis, 2(1), 135-150.
Bolifaar, A.H., Jaya, N.S.P., Pujiyono,, & Arif, F. (2019). Authority of Indonesian attorney in handling the corruption crimes: A perspective of integrated criminal justice system. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 22(5), 1–8.
Darumurti, K. D. (2014). Perspektif Filosofis Konsep Kekuasaan Diskresi Pemerintah. Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 8(1), 41-60. https://doi.org/10.24246/jrh.2014.v8.i1.p41-60
Elliott, M., Beatson, J., & Matthews, M. (2011). Beatson, Matthews and Elliott's Administrative Law Text and Materials. Oxford University Press.
Entah, A. R. (2016). Indonesia: Negara Hukum yang Berdasarkan Pancasila. In Seminar Nasional Hukum (Vol. 2, pp. 534-542).
Fathuddin, F. (2015). Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Dugaan Penyalahgunaan Wewenang) Pejabat Publik (Perspektif Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 Tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan). Jurnal Cita Hukum, 3(1), 95370. https://doi.org/10.15408/jch.v2i1.1844
Gulo, N., Jaya, N.S.P., & Pujiyono. (2020). Managerial factors of education program performance in correctional institutions. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 9(4), 749–751.
Hadjon, P. M. (2005). Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press
Indarti, E. (2010). Diskresi dan Paradigma: Sebuah telaah filsafat hukum. Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro.
Indarti, E. (2020). Legal philosophy about the performance of the Indonesian national police. Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, 14(4), 3046–3052
Indarti, E. (2020). Strengthen security and public order: Accountability management in improving the quality of law enforcement. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 9(2), 82–88. https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2020-0025
Ispriyarso, B., & Saadah, N. (2019). Independence and procedures of tax dispute resolution institutions in Indonesia and East Asian countries. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 10(2), 109–117.
Kreveld, J. H. (1983). Beleidsregels in het recht. Kluwer.
Minarno, N. B. (2007). Pembuktian Unsur Penyalahgunaan Wewenang Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Perspektif, 12(1), 45-56. https://doi.org/10.30742/perspektif.v12i1.363
Mukhlis, R., Indarti, E., Pujiono. (2020). Social and managerial aspects in policy making in criminal prosecution basis. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 9(1), 1637–1639.
Muslimin, A. (1985). Beberapa Asas dan Pengertian Pokok Tentang Administrasi dan Hukum Administrasi. Pb. Alumni.
Mustafa, B. (1990). Pokok-Pokok Hukum Administrasi Negara. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Packer, H. L. (1966). The courts, the police, and the rest of us. The Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science, 57(3), 238-243. https://doi.org/10.2307/1140719
Patiro, Y. M. I. (2012). Diskresi pejabat publik dan tindak pidana korupsi. Keni Media.
Post, R. C. (1984). The Management of Speech: Discretion and Rights. The Supreme Court Review, 1984, 169-236. https://doi.org/10.1086/scr.1984.3536940
Rasyid, A. (2004). Wewenang Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Implikasinya dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Republik Indonesia (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Airlangga).
Ridwan. (2009). Tiga Dimensi Hukum Administrasi dan Peradilan Administrasi. FH UII Press.
Saraswati, R., Ristyawati, A., Basworo, R.S. (2020). Recent developments and changes in the governance of regional legal products in Indonesia: Supervision, evaluation and clarification mechanisms. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 12(7), 1–9.
Sihotang, G. A., Pujiyono, P., & Sa’adah, N. (2017). Diskresi dan tanggung jawab pejabat publik pada pelaksanaan tugas dalam situasi darurat. Law Reform, 13(1), 60-69. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v13i1.15951
Stroink, F. A. M., & Steenbeek, J. G. (1989). Inleiding in het staats-en administratief recht. Samsom HD Tjeenk Willink.
Susilo, A. B. (2015). Makna dan kriteria diskresi Keputusan dan/atau tindakan pejabat publik dalam mewujudkan tata pemerin-tahan yang baik. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 4(1), 133-152. https://doi.org/10.25216/JHP.4.1.2015.133-152
Widijowati, D. (2016). Determining Criminal Actions in Corruption: The characteristics of Freies Ermessen Principles. The Southeast Asia Law Journal, 2(1), 56-63. https://doi.org/10.31479/salj.v1i2.7
Yuhdi, M. (2013). Peranan Diskresi dalam Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan. Likhitaprajna, 15(1), 69-83.
Zulfan,, Saraswati, R., Sukirno,, & Sa’adah, N. (2021). Redesign of the legislative function of the regional representative council of the republic of indonesia to strengthen regional autonomy. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, 13(1), 936–941. https://doi.org/10.31838/ijpr/2021.13.01.156
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Policy for Journals/Articles with Open Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work
Policy for Journals / Manuscript with Paid Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Publisher retain copyright .
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work .
