Social Distrust Impact Analysis: Political Overview Competition Law

Evita Isretno  Israhadi

doi:10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.292

Authors

Evita Isretno Israhadi Faculty of Law, Borobudur University, Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.292

Keywords:

Business Actors, Business Competition, Legal Politics.

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to reveal the contents of civil law regarding business competition and social lessons from the prohibition of unfair business competition (monopoly and other fraud) contained in Indonesian government policies. The research method used is qualitative content analysis with a normative juridical approach using the keyword 'Policy related to business competition.' The results of this study indicate two findings. First, Law No. 5/1999 concerning the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition is an implementation of the politics of business competition law in Indonesia. In principle, the politics of business competition law in Indonesia depends on the political will of the House of Representatives (DPR) as the legislative body together with the Government as the executive in making laws. Because Law Number 5 of 1999 concerning the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition is not yet effective enough in creating fair business competition in Indonesia because, in substance, the Law still contains weaknesses in several articles that make the performance of the Business Competition Supervisory. The commission is not maximal. Second, government policies contained in the Civil Code, KUHP, Law no. 5 of 1984 concerning Provisions for Main Industries, Law no. 8/1995 concerning Capital Market, Law no. 9 of 1995 concerning Small Businesses, and Law No. 36 of Telecommunications provide important lessons regarding the prohibition of monopolies and fraudulent practices that can hinder the economy and equitable social welfare. The expected implication is that social learning from government policies in the field of law regarding deregulation, investment, and other policies aimed at supporting business competition can promote sustainable development, particularly in industry, small businesses, capital markets, and telecommunications.

References

Andreas, R., Andini, P. R., & Rulanda, S. P. (2019). Islamic Perspective In Consumers Protecting Of E-Commerce Transactions In Indonesia. Ikonomika, 4(1), 60-70. https://doi.org/10.24042/febi.v4i1.3898

Bengtsson, M. (2016). How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. Nursing Plus Open, 2, 8-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.npls.2016.01.001

Berelson, B. (1954). Content analysis. Handbook of social psychology, 1, 488-522.

Bernard L. Tanya, Politik Hukum Agenda Kepentingan Bersama, Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing, 2011, Cet.I.

Bos, W., & Tarnai, C. (1999). Content analysis in empirical social research. International journal of educational research, 31(8), 659-671. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00032-4

Claassen, R., & Gerbrandy, A. (2018). Doing good together: Competition law and the political legitimacy of Interfirm cooperation. Business Ethics Quarterly, 28(4), 401-425. https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2018.2

Daliman, D., Sulandari, S., & Rosyana, I. (2019). The Achievement of Entrepreneurship Competence and Entrepreneurial Intentions: Gender Role, Attitude and Perception of Entrepreneurship Controls Mediation. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 10(4), 392-426. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/216550/

Drexl, J. (2017). Economic efficiency versus democracy: On the potential role of competition policy in regulating digital Markets in Times of post-truth politics. Max Planck Institute for Innovation & Competition Research Paper No. 16-16. DOI: 10.1017 / 9781108628105.013

Drexl, J. (2019). Economic Efficiency vs. Democracy: On the Potential Role of Competition Policy in Regulating Digital Markets in Times of Post-Truth Politics. In Reconciling Efficiency and Equity-A Global Challenge for Competition Policy (pp. 242-267). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108628105.013

Hartono, S. R. (1995). Hukum asuransi dan perusahaan asuransi. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Hidayat, M. F. (2017). Politik Hukum Persaingan Usaha Di Indonesia. Jurnal Cahaya Keadilan, 5(1), 78-103. https://doi.org/10.33884/jck.v5i1.913

Ivanov, K., Kiselevich, Y., & Shcherbakova, E. (2018). The role of competition law in the development of transition countries: azerbaijan as example. Modern Problems of Law, Economics and Management, (1), 249-258.

Julien, H. (2008). Content analysis. The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods, 1, 120-121.

Krippendorff, K. (1980). Validity in content analysis. In E. Mochmann (Ed.), Computerstrategien fur die kommunikationsanalyse (pp. 69-112). Frankfurt, Germany: Campus. Retrived August 29, 2020 from http://repository.upenn.edu/asc_papers/ 291Moh.

Mahfud, MD. (2011). Politik Hukum di Indonesia, Cet. IV. Jakarta: Rajawali.

Manan, B. (1992). Dasar-dasar perundang-undangan Indonesia. New York: Ind-Hill-Company.

Natalia, P., & Alexandr, G. (2018). Competitive Economic Development of The Republic of Moldova. International Business and Accounting Research Journal, 2(1), 47-51. https://doi.org/10.15294/ibarj.v2i1.38

Nusantara, A. H. G., & Hakim, A. (1985). Politik Hukum Nasional. makalah disampaikan pada Karya Latihan Bantuan Hukum (Kalabahu), diselenggarakan Yayasan LBH Indonesia dan LBH Surabaya.

Putri, M. P.D. Suganda., Samekto, A., yusriyadi, Y., & Sularto, RB. (2020). Reconstruction of Social and Environmental Responsibility Policies for Companies in Central Java. The First International Conference On Islamic Development Studies 2019, ICIDS 2019, 10 September 2019, Bandar Lampung, Indonesia. Retrived August 29, 2020 from https://eudl.eu/doi/10.4108/eai.10-9-2019.2289423

Rahardjo, S. (1991). Ilmu hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Rollings, N., & Warlouzet, L. (2018). Business history and European integration: How EEC competition policy affected companies’ strategies. Business History, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/00076791.2018.1488966

Santoso, B., & Djailani, M. Fadil. (2020). KPPU Denda Grab Rp 30 Miliar, Ganggun Investasi Asing. Retrived August 29, 2020 from https://www.suara.com/bisnis/2020/07/05/104612/kppu-denda-grab-rp-30-miliar-ganggu-investasi-asing?page=2

Saputra, Andi. (2020). MA Denda AQUA RP 13,8 Miliar karena Terbukti Monopoli Usaha. Retrived August 29, 2020 from https://news.detik.com/berita/d-4801904/ma-denda-aqua-rp-138-miliar-karena-terbukti-monopoli-usaha/2

Sein, K. (2013). Private enforcement of competition law–the case of Estonia. Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies (YARS), 6(8), 129-139. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2736227

Sumarno, J. Totok. (2020). KPPU Tetap Berperan Hadapi Gejolak Pelaku Usaha di Tengah Pandemi Covid-19. Retrived August 29, 2020 from https://www.suarasurabaya.net/kelanakota/ 2020/kppu-tetap-berperan-hadapi-gejolak-pelaku-usaha-di-tengah-pandemi-covid-19/

Van Buuren, A., & Loorbach, D. (2009).Policy innovation in isolation? Conditions for policy renewal by transition arenas and pilot projects. Public Management Review, 11(3), 375-392. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030902798289

Wahjono, P. (1991, April). Menyelisik Proses Terbentuknya Perundang-Undangan. In artikel dalam majalah Forum Keadilan (No. 29). Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.