The Impact of Gender Identity on In-Group Trust

Ivan  Danyliuk; Andrii  Trofimov; Mariia  Vovk; Oleksandr  Zelenko; Yana  Kutsenko; Olha  Prosina

doi:10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.58

Authors

Ivan Danyliuk Taras Shevchenko Kyiv National University, Kyiv, Ukraine
Andrii Trofimov Taras Shevchenko Kyiv National University, Kyiv, Ukraine
Mariia Vovk Taras Shevchenko Kyiv National University, Kyiv, Ukraine
Oleksandr Zelenko Taras Shevchenko Kyiv National University, Kyiv, Ukraine
Yana Kutsenko Taras Shevchenko Kyiv National University, Kyiv, Ukraine
Olha Prosina University of Educational Management, Kyiv, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.58

Keywords:

Psychology of management, management style, emotional intelligence, group trust, gender indentity.

Abstract

The article discusses the problem of the influence of gender identity on intra-group trust. Various scientific views on the category of trust are examined. Attention is also paid to the socio-psychological function of trust. Trust, in turn, is the foundation of the relationship between people and a factor in the effectiveness of cooperation. Having defined gender identity, we can say which form of identification positively affects internal group trust, and therefore the effectiveness of cooperation in a sports team. The article describes what type of gender identification (masculinity, femininity, androgyny) positively affects internal group trust, and does this have any connection with the success of a sports team. Also in the article to answer our tasks: 1) conduct a theoretical analysis of foreign and domestic theories of the formation of gender identity; 2) to study the theoretical foundations of the phenomenon of trust and analyze the importance of trust as a component of interpersonal communication in a sports team; 3) conduct a study to determine the gender identity of the person and determine the level of trust in the sports team; 4) analyze the relationship between gender identity and trust in a sports team; 5) to trace the influence of these factors on the success of a football team.

References

Afanas’ev, M.P., Shash, N.N. 2020. Russian Investments in European Countries: Current State and Future Prospects. Studies on Russian Economic Development, 31, 327-334. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1075700720030028 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1075700720030028

Afanasyev, M. P., Shash, N. 2019. Russian Federation Cross-Border Investments and Bank Expansion. Public Administration Issues, 6, 105-120. https://doi.org/10.17323/1999-5431-2019-0-6-105-120 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/1999-5431-2019-0-6-105-120

Avdulova, T.P. 2009. Gender socialization and communication structure in adolescence. Psychological research: electronic scientific journal, 5(7).

Bem, S.L. 1974. The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155-162. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0036215 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0036215

Boyko, M. 2013. Trust as a fundamental basis for the formation of social capital of the organization. Ukraine: Aspects of Labor, 2, 48-51.

Fetiskin, N.P., Kozlov, V.V., Manuilov, G.M. 2005. Socio-psychological diagnosis of personality development and small groups. Moscow: Publishing House of the Institute of Psychotherapy.

Ilyin, E.P. 2008. Psychology of sport. Saint Petersburg: Piter.

Kolomeytsev, Yu.A. 1984. Relationships in the sports team. Moscow: Physical Culture and Sports.

Krupelnytska, L., Zelenin, V., Ortikova, N., Sytnyk, V., Emishyants, O. 2019. Features of Staff Motivation in the Field of Information Technology. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 8(8), 27-30.

Kupreychenko, A.B. 2008. The psychology of trust and mistrust. Moscow: Publishing House «Institute of Psychology RAS».

Miliutina, K., Trofimov, A., Paschenko, S., Vakulenko, O., Romanova, I., Rohal, N. 2018. The Use of Projective Methods in Working with Staff. Astra Salvensis, 1(11), 495-504.

Platonov, Yu.P. 1998. Psychology of collective activity. Moscow.

Safonov, B.C. 1978. Features of trusting communication. Author's abstract. Dis. Cand. Psychol. Science, 21.

Shaw, R.B. 2000. Keys to trust in the organization: Efficiency, decency, care. Moscow: Delo.

Skripkina, T.P. 2000a. The Psychology of Confidence. Moscow: Publishing Center «Academy».

Skripkina, T.P. 2000b. Trust in the world as a fundamental condition for tolerance. Rostov on Don: RSU.

Trofimov, A., Drobot, O., Kоkаrieva A., Maksymova, N., Lovochkina, A., Kozytska, I. 2019a. The influence of management style and emotional intelligence on the formation of employees’ commitment and loyalty. Humanities and Social Sciences Reviews, 7(5), 393-404. https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2019.7544 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2019.7544

Trofimov, A., Matviienko, L., Emishyants, O., Tretiakova, Y., Zelenin, V., Andrushchenko, T., Kotsiuba, H. 2019b. Socio-Psychological Factors of Corporate Loyalty. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 8(11), 3439-3442.

Trofimov, A., Miliutina, K., Drobot, O., Lyuta, L., Otych, D., Pustovyi, S., Karamushka, T. 2019c. A study on psychological capital by a method of semantic differential. Humanities and Social Sciences Reviews, 7(5), 387-392. https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2019.7543 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2019.7543

Tsokur, O.S, Ivanova, I.V. 2005. Fundamentals of gender education. Kiev: Foliant.

Turner, J. 1978. The experimental social psychology of intergroup behavior. Paper presented at the B.P.S. Social Psychology Section Conference on Intergroup Behaviour, Bristol.

Uyzbayeva, A., Sagikyzy, A., Akhmetova, G., Kozhamzharova, M. 2014. On the methodology of studying the phenomenon of patriotism. European Journal of Science and Theology, 10(6), 217-224.

Voronina, O.A. 2005. Sociocultural determinants of the development of gender theory in Russia and the West: a training manual. Moscow: Pedagogy.