Restorative Justice as a Resolution for the Crime of Rape with Child Perpetrators

Authors

  • Edhei Sulistyo Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang City, Imam Bardjo SH Street No. 1, Pleburan, Semarang City, 50241, Indonesia
  • Pujiyono Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang City, Imam Bardjo SH Street No. 1, Pleburan, Semarang City, 50241, Indonesia
  • Nur

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2021.10.69

Keywords:

Restorative Justice, Resolution,, Crime, Child Perpetrators

Abstract

A child who commits a criminal act can be called a child in conflict with the law. One of the crimes committed by children was rape, which involved elementary and junior high school children in Probolinggo; they reportedly raped a high school student until they became pregnant. Sexual crimes against children occur in Southeast Asian countries, such as the Philippines, Thailand, Sri Lanka, Malaysia, and Indonesia. The purpose of this study was to review restorative justice as an effort to resolve the criminal act of rape with child perpetrators. The research method used is normative juridical research, with the approach of laws and concepts and collecting primary legal material in the form of existing cases. This study found that the restorative justice process in juvenile crime is essential because there are essential things to focus on the regulation that requires the active role of the community, perpetrators, and victims of crime, including the affected community, in the restorative justice process. A fundamental balancing approach must also be taken, namely, first, imposing sanctions based on responsibility for recovering victims' losses as a consequence of criminal acts; second, rehabilitation and reintegration of actors; and third, strengthening community safety and security systems.

References

Angkasa, & et al. (2009). Model Peradilan Restoratif Dalam Sistem Peradilan Anak (Kajian tentang Praktik Mediasi Pelaku dan Korban dalam Proses Peradilan Anak di Wilayah Hukum Balai Pemasyarakatan Purwokerto). Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 9 (9), 191. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2009.9.3.230 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2009.9.3.230

Danielt, R. T. (2014). Penerapan Restorative Justice Terhadap Tindak Pidana Anak Pencurian Oleh Anak Di Bawah Umur. Jurnal Lex et Societatis, II (6), 24.

Davies, S. G., & Robson, J. (2016). Juvenile (In)justice: Children in Conflict with the Law in Indonesia. Asia-Pacific Journal On Human Rights And The Law, 1 (17), 120. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718158-01701009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15718158-01701009

Ernis, Y. (2016). Diversi Dan Keadilan Restoratif Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Tindak Pidana Anak Di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum, 10 (2), 165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21107/ri.v10i2.1235

Hutahaean, B. (2013). Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Anak Kajian Putusan Nomor 50/Pid.B/2009/Pn.Btg. Jurnal Yudisial, 6 (1), 65.

Hutauruk, R. H. (2013). Penanggulangan Kejahatan Korporasi melalui Pendekatan Restoratif. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Jamil, M. N. (2013). Anak Bukan untuk Dihukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Kustrini. (2015). Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Kesusilaan Antar Anak Dengan Pendekatan Restorative Justice. Jurisprudence, 5 (2), 84.

Laksana, A. W. (2017). Keadilan Restoratif dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Anak yang Berhadapan dengan Hukum dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum, IV (1), 61. https://doi.org/10.26532/jph.v4i1.1644 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26532/jph.v4i1.1644

Marlina. (2009). Peradilan Pidana anak di Indonesia: Pengembangan Konsep Diversi dan Restorative Justice. Bandung : Refika Aditama.

Maskur, M. A. (2012). Legal Protection Against Naughty Children (Juvenile Delinquency) In Indonesian Criminal Procedure Process. Pandecta, 7 (2), 172.

Muhammad, R. (2014). Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. Yogyakarta: UII Press.

Muladi. (2013). Restorative Justice dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana dan Implementasinya dalam Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana yang dilakukan oleh Anak-Anak. Jakarta : BPHN.

Mulyadi, L. (2014). Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. Bandung: Alumni.

Nasional, B. P. (2013). Pengkajian Hukum Tentang Penerapan Restorative Justice Dalam Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Yang Dilakukan Oleh Anak-Anak. Jakarta: BPHN.

Noho, M. D. (2019). Politik Hukum Pengaturan Build Operate Transfer (BOT) Di Indonesia: Di Masa Lalu, Saat Ini, Dan Akan Datang. Jurnal Hukum Media Bhakti, 3 (1), 90. https://doi.org/10.32501/jhmb.v3i1.51 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32501/jhmb.v3i1.35

Palanichamy, A. (2016). Child Rights, Poverty and Protection: An Indian perspective. Journal On Rights Of The Child, 1 (1), 1.

Palanichamy, A. (2016). Child Rights, Povertyand Protection: An Indian perspective. Journal On Rights Of The Child, 1 (1), 1.

Pramukti, A. S., & Primaharsya, F. (2014 ). Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. Yogyakarta: Mediapress Digital.

Prayitno, K. P. (2012). Restorative Justice Untuk Peradilan Di Indonesia (Perspektif Yuridis Filosofis Dalam Penegakan Hukum In Concreto). Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 12 (3), 413. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2012.12.3.116 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2012.12.3.116

Purnomo, B., Gunarto, & Purnawan, A. (2018). Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Anak Sebagai Pelaku Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak (Studi Kasus Di Polres Tegal). Jurnal Hukum Khaira Ummah, 13 (1), 49.

Riyanto, A. (2016). The Existence and Legal Position of the Chief of Police Circular Regarding the Handling of Hate Speech. Journal of the Light of Justice, 3.

Rokamah, R. (2013). Restorative Justice Bagi Anak Pelaku Tindak Pidana Perkosaan Anak Perspektif Hukum Islam Dan Hukum Positif. Jurnal justitia Islamica, 10 (2), 277. https://doi.org/10.21154/justicia.v10i2.150 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21154/justicia.v10i2.150

Saharuddin. (2014). Legal Protection of Children as Perpetrators of Murder (Case Study of Decision No: 164 / Pid.B / 2009 / PN.PL). Legal Opinion Law Studies, 2 (6), 3.

Sidabalok, M., & Hosianna. (2012). Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Anak Korban Tindak Pidana Pemerkosaan yang Dilakukan oleh Anak. Majalah Hukum Varia Peradilan, XXVII (325), 2.

Sjahdein, S. R. (2017). Ajaran Pemidanaan: Tindak Pidana Korporasi dan Seluk Beluknya. Depok: Kencana.

Soemitro, R. H. (1990). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum dan Jurimetri. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.

Sukoco, B. (2016). Pendekatan Restoratif Justice Sebagai Upaya Penyelesaian Cybercrime Dengan Pelaku Anak (Studi Kasus Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Anak Usia Sekolah). Jurnal Law and Justice, 1 (1), 60. https://doi.org/10.23917/laj.v1i1.2859 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23917/laj.v1i1.2859

Sulchan, A., & Ghani, M. G. (2017). The Mechanism of Prosecuting the Public Prosecutor for the Crime of Children. Ulul Albab: Study and Research of Islamic Law, 1 (1), 114. https://doi.org/10.30659/jua.v1i1.2218 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30659/jua.v1i1.2218

Supramono, G. (2010). Hukum Acara Pengadilan Anak. Jakarta: Djambatan.

Utami, P. R. (2018). Konsep Diversi Dan Restorative Justice Sebagai Pergeseran Tanggung Jawab Pidana Pada Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. Jurnal Volkgeist, 1 (1), 97. https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v1i1.1691 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v1i1.1691

Downloads

Published

2021-03-03

How to Cite

Sulistyo, E. ., Pujiyono, & Nur. (2021). Restorative Justice as a Resolution for the Crime of Rape with Child Perpetrators. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 10, 595–602. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2021.10.69

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)