Debt Guarantee Settlement Patterns in Minangkabau
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2021.10.38Keywords:
Debtguarantee, rights, ownershipAbstract
Debt collateral is often unacceptable to the execution of debt collateral because there is coercion and leads to court so that many debts are not collected. In Minangkabau customary law, there is no compulsion to pay off debts. This research answers how people make debt-receivables agreements and must be repaid by the debtors in the Minangkabau customary law arrangement in Sungai Dareh village, West Sumatra. This research method is through observation and interviews of local customary leaders. The implementation of the pattern of execution of debt collateral settlement in Minangkabau is motivated by the legal relationship between the creditor and the collateral in the form of land. The creditor only has the right to cultivate or take the proceeds from the land given by the debt recipient until the debt is paid off or redeemed by the debt recipient, so that debt settlement will never transfer ownership rights to the land. In an urgent situation, the creditor can transfer the debt to the new lender, which stops the legal relationship between the first creditor and the debt recipient and creates a new legal relationship between the second creditor and the debt recipient. Creditors' rights remain a priority, and there is no time limit in paying off debts. This debt settlement is very different from debt settlement in positive law in Indonesia. The creditor has the right to sell the land as collateral for the debt if the debt cannot be settled after a certain period, which results in the loss of ownership of the debt recipient over the land that is used as debt collateral. There is a need for positive legal reform in Indonesia regarding the execution of debt guarantees.
References
Berger, A. N., & Udell, G. F. (1990). Collateral, loan quality and bank risk. Journal of Monetary Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(90)90042-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(90)90042-3
Diamond, D. W., & He, Z. (2014). A theory of debt maturity: The long and short of debt overhang. Journal of Finance. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12118 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12118
Feigenberg, B., & Pande, R. (2013). The economic returns to social interaction: Experimental evidence from microfinance. Review of Economic Studies. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdt016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdt016
Foos, D., Norden, L., & Weber, M. (2010). Loan growth and riskiness of banks. Journal of Banking and Finance. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2010.06.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2010.06.007
Fungsi Jaminan Dalam Pemberian Kredit. (2013). Lex Privatum.
Haar, B. ter. (1976). Asas-asas dan Susunan Hukum Aat. Pradnya Paramita.
Hadikusuma, H. (1978). Sejarah hukum adat Indonesia. Alumni.
Harsono, B. (2003). Hukum Agraria Indonesia: Sejarah Pembentukan Undang-undang Pokok Agraria, isi, dan Pelaksanaannya. Djambatan.
Hogg, M. (2019). Agreement. In Reimagining Contract Law Pedagogy: A New Agenda for Teaching. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315178189 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315178189-2
Holstein, J. A., & Gubrium, J. F. (2009). Handbook of Qualitatif Research (Third Edit). London: SAGE Publications.
Hutagalung, A. S. (2002). Serba Aneka Masalah Tanah dalam Kegiatan Ekonomi: Suatu Kumpulan Karangan. Badan Penerbit, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Indonesia.
Lusardi, A., & Tufano, P. (2015). Debt literacy, financial experiences, and overindebtedness. Journal of Pension Economics and Finance. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474747215000232 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474747215000232
Marnita, M. (2017). Eksekusi Jaminan Hak Tanggungan Sebagai Upaya Penyelesaian Pembiayaan Bermasalah (Studi pada PT Bank Muamalat Indonesia Cabang Lampung). Fiat Justisia. https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v10no3.791 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v10no3.791
McConville, M., & Chui, W. H. (2007). Research Methods for Law. In Research Methods for Law.
Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (Edisi Revisi). In PT. Remaja Rosda Karya.
Naim, M. (1968). Menggali hukum tanah dan hukum waris Minangkabau. Center for Minangkabau Studies Press.
Navis, A. A. (1984). Alam Terkembang Jadi Guru: Adat dan Kebudayaan Minangkabau. Grafiti Pers.
Nurjannah, S. (2018). Eksistensi Hak Tanggungan Sebagai Lembaga Jaminan Hak Atas Tanah (Tinjauan Filosofis). Jurisprudentie: Jurusan Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Syariah Dan Hukum. https://doi.org/10.24252/jurisprudentie.v5i2.5439 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24252/jurisprudentie.v5i2.5439
Parlour, C. A., & Winton, A. (2013). Laying off credit risk: Loan sales versus credit default swaps. Journal of Financial Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.08.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.08.004
Partanto, P. A., & Al Barry, M. D. (1994). Kamus Ilmiah Populer. Surabaya: Arkola.
Poesoko, H. (2007). Parate executie obyek hak tanggungan: inkonsistensi, konflik norma, dan kesesatan penalaran dalam {UUHT}. LaksBang PRESSindo.
Prodjodikoro, W. (1986). Hukum Perdata tentang Hak Atas Benda. Intermasa.
Sardjito, D. A, S. T. (1950). Gadai Menurut Hukum Adat (Suatu telaah mengenai gadai pohon). Hukum Dan Pembangunan.
Sasongko, N. R. A. (2014). Gadai Tanah Berdasarkan Hukum Adat dari Masa ke Masa. Jurnal Repertorium.
Satrio, J. (1997). Hukum Jaminan, Hak Jaminan Kebendaan, Hak Tanggungan. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Subekti, R. (1991). Jaminan-jaminan untuk Pemberian Kredit Menurut Hukum Indonesia. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Sudiyat, I. (1978). Hukum Adat: Sketsa Asas. Liberty.
Sugono, D. (2008). Kamus Bahasa Indonesia (4th ed.). Pusat Bahasa Depatemen Pendidikan Nasional.
Sull, D., Homkes, R., & Sull, C. (2015). Why strategy execution unravels— and what to do about it. Harvard Business Review.
Supramono, G. (2014). Perjanjian Utang Piutang. Kencana.
Tje’Aman, E. P. (1989). Kredit Perbankan: Suatu Tinjauan Yuridis. Liberty.
Van Binsbergen, J. H., Graham, J. R., & Yang, J. (2010). The cost of debt. Journal of Finance. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01611.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w16023
Watkins, D., & Burton, M. (2017). Research methods in law. In Research Methods in Law. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315386669 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315386669
Winarno, J. (2016). Penyelesaian Kredit Macet Dengan Jaminan Sertifikat Hak Milik Atas Tanah Menurut Undang - Undang Nomor 04 Tahun 1996 Tentang Hak Tanggungan. Jurnal Independent. https://doi.org/10.30736/ji.v4i1.46 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30736/ji.v4i1.46
Yahman. (2017). Karakteristik Wanprestasi & Tindak Pidana Penipuan. Prenada Media.
Yahman. (2019). Cara Mudah Memahami Wanprestasi & Penipuan dalam Hubungan Kontrak Komersial. Prenada Media.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Policy for Journals/Articles with Open Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work
Policy for Journals / Manuscript with Paid Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Publisher retain copyright .
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work .
