Sustainable Development of Society and Russian Philosophy: Educational Aspect

Evgenia N.  Gerasimova; Aleksandr V.  Usachev; Irina N.  Usacheva; Sergey V.  Shcherbatykh

doi:10.6000/1929-4409.2021.10.13

Authors

Evgenia N. Gerasimova Bunin Yelets State University, Yelets, Russian Federation
Aleksandr V. Usachev Bunin Yelets State University, Yelets, Russian Federation
Irina N. Usacheva Bunin Yelets State University, Yelets, Russian Federation
Sergey V. Shcherbatykh Bunin Yelets State University, Yelets, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2021.10.13

Keywords:

Man, nature, society, biosphere, co-evolution, personality-activity approach, subject-subject relationship, sustainable development, Russian philosophy, student

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to project the general statements of the philosophical tradition and domestic psychological schools of thought on the specific situation of teaching and education, as well as to compare the historically emerging ideas of upbringing and education with modern approaches, and to trace the genetic connection and the continuity of ideas. In this context, it is possible to draw conclusions and learn lessons for the development of the modern pedagogical situation. The research results are novel and practically significant, since the main conclusion is the choice of a methodological basis for teaching natural sciences with a view to the sustainable development of society as a whole and within the framework of subject-subject relationship in particular. According to the chosen methodology, teaching information about sustainable development involves a set of interconnected methods for the purpose of their application in the educational process so to access each student individually. A special contribution of the authors is a comparative analysis of approaches to training and education, which result in the sustainable development of society.

References

Abramyan E. A. (2012). Rio Sustainable Development Conferences (1992-2012). http://globosfera.info/2012/09/23/konferentsii-rio-po-ustoychivomu-razvitiyu-1992-2012/

Berdyaeva N. A. (2003). The Experience of Paradoxical Ethics. Kharkiv: Folio.

Bettencourt L. M. A., & Kaur, J. (2011). The evolution and structure of sustainability science. PNAS, 108(49), 19449-50. Corpus ID: 197410285 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1102712108 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1102712108

Boekhout, B. (2009). Concepts of Sustainability. Uppsala, 157(8).

Braakman, R. (2019). Evolution of cellular metabolism and the rise of a globally productive biosphere. Free Radical Biology and Medicine, 140, 172-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2019.05.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2019.05.004

Braakman, R., Follows, M. J., & Chisholm, S. W. (2017). Metabolic evolution and the self-organization of ecosystems Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114(15), E3091-E3100. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1619573114 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1619573114

Collado-Ruano, J. (2019). Philosophical reflections on Education for Sustainable Development: A complex, transdisciplinary, and biomimetic approach. Foro de Educacion, 17(26), 135-152. https://doi.org/10.14516/fde.575 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14516/fde.575

Guseva, M. V., Blokhin, L. V., & Kubareva, M. V. (2020). The value of environmental education in the system of environmental protection. From environmental education to the ecology of the future. VI All-Russian scientific-practical conference on environmental education (Moscow, October 30 - November 1, 2019): Collection of materials and reports. Scientific publication. Edited by V. A. Grachev. Moscow: Foundation named after V. I. Vernadsky. ISBN 978-5-9907508-9-0

Heidegger, M. (1993). Being and Time. Articles and speeches. Moscow: Respublika.

Jovanov, E. (2019). Wearables meet IoT: Synergistic personal area networks (SPANs). Sensors (Switzerland), 19(19), 4295. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19194295 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s19194295

Kates, R. W. (2011). What kind of science is sustainability science? PNAS, 108(49). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1116097108 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1116097108

Kirby, C. K., Jaimes, P., Lorenz-Reaves, A. R., Libarkin, J. C. (2019). Development of a measure to evaluate competence perceptions of natural and social science. PLoS ONE, 14(1), e0209311. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209311 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209311

Kobylyansky, V. A. (2010). Philosophy of Ecology. Moscow: Academic project.

Leroy, P. (1999). Social and Political Sciences of the Environment. Three Decades of Research in the Netherland. Utrecht: Int. Books.

Lieber, L., Nimmo-Smith, W. A. M., Waggitt, J. J., & Kregting, L. (2019). Localized anthropogenic wake generates a predictable foraging hotspot for top predators. Communications Biology, 2(1), 123. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-019-0364-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-019-0364-z

Martínez, L. M., Estrada, D., & Prada, S. I. (2019). Mental health, interpersonal trust and subjective well-being in a high violence context. SSM - Population Health, 8, 100423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2019.100423 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2019.100423

Moiseyev, N. N. (2016). Works on education. http://partner-unitwin.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Моисеев-Н.Н.-об-образовании.pdf

Moor, K. D., Van Haitsma, K., Curito, K., & Saperstain, A. (2003). A pragmatic environmental psychology: A metatheoretical inquiry into the work of M. Powell Lawton. Journal of environmental psychology, 23(4), 471 – 482. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00116-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00116-0

N. A. (1988). The Problem of a Human Being in the Western Philosophy. Moscow: Progress.

N. A. (2020). Moiseyev Readings: “Moiseyev N.N. about Russia in the XXI century: global challenges, risks and solutions” (March 2-6, 2020), Moscow. Collection of reports XXVIII Moiseyev Readings (MCh-20). https://buran-sas.ru/sbornik-mch-20/

Popper, K. R. (2004). Assumptions and rebutments: The advance of scientific knowledge. Moscow: AST Publishers; NPP Ermak ZAO.

Rasheed, T., Bilal, M., Nabeel, F., Adeel, M., & Iqbal, H. M. N. (2019). Environmentally-related contaminants of high concern: Potential sources and analytical modalities for detection, quantification, and treatment. Environment International, 122, 52-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2018.11.038 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2018.11.038

Rashid, L. (2019). Entrepreneurship education and sustainable development goals: A literature review and a closer look at fragile states and technology-enabled approaches. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(19), 5343. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195343 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195343

Soloviev, V. S. (1990). Works in 2 Volumes. Moscow: Mysl.

Tofler, E. (2005). War and anti-war: What is war and how to deal with it? How to survive at the dawn of the 21st century? Moscow: AST Publishers: Transitkniga.

Usacheva, I. N. (2019). Problems of the formation of ecological culture in education. Modern science-intensive technologies, 5, 388-394. https://doi.org/10.17513/snt.37891 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17513/snt.37891

Vernadsky, V. I. (2019). Citations. https://citaty.info/man/vladimir-ivanovich-vernadskii

Zakharov, V. M., & Kolesova, E. V. (2014). The role of professional communications in the development of environmental education and enlightenment. Environmental education for sustainable development: a step into the future. Proceedings of the conference on June 26-27, 2014. Moscow: MNEPU Publishing House. ISBN 978-5-7383-0389-0

Zimmermann, B., Seiler, S. (2019). The relationship between educational pathways and occupational outcomes at the intersection of gender and social origin. Social Inclusion, 7(3), 79-94. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v7i3.2035 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v7i3.2035