The Effects of Criminal Embeddedness on School Violence in Brazil

Braulio Figueiredo Alves da Silva; Silvio Segundo Salej Higgins; Elenice DeSouza Oliveira

doi:10.6000/1929-4409.2019.08.12

Authors

Braulio Figueiredo Alves da Silva Department of Sociology, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Brazil
Silvio Segundo Salej Higgins Department of Sociology, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Brazil
Elenice DeSouza Oliveira Department of Justice Studies, Montclair State University, Montclair, NJ, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2019.08.12

Keywords:

Delinquent behavior, School violence, Criminal embeddeness, School satisfaction, Brazil.

Abstract

This study examines the influence of criminal embeddedness on the intensity of criminal behavior among primary and secondary school students in a large Brazilian city. A database conceived by the Center for the Study of Crime and Public Security at the Federal University in Minas Gerais is used to analyze the involvement of youths displaying delinquent behavior at home or at school and how school performance and peer relationships are effected. Based on differential association and learning theories, the main hypotheses are (1) the greater the criminal embeddedness, the lower the degree of school satisfaction as well as future expectation of continued higher education, and (2) the greater the criminal embeddedness, the greater the risk of the intensity of deviant and criminal behavior. Applying statistical linear and nonlinear regression models, findings indicate that the criminal embeddedness has a negative and statistically significant association with the student’s level of school satisfaction.

References

Akers R. L. (2000). Criminological theories: Introduction, evaluation, and application (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury Publishing.

__________ (1988). Social Learning and Social Structure: a general theory of crime and deviance. Boston: Northeastern University Press.

__________ (1996). Is differential association/social learning cultural deviance theory? Criminology, 34, p. 229–247. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1996.tb01204.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1996.tb01204.x

___________(1977). Deviant Behavior: A social learning approach (2nd ed.) Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. New York: General Learning Press.

Bandura, A. Azzi, G. R., Polydoro, S. A. (2008) Teoria Social Cognitiva: Conceitos básicos. Porto Alegre: Artmed.

Beier, H. (2014). Peer effects in offending behaviour across contexts: Disentangling selection, opportunity and learning processes. European Journal of Criminology Vol 11(1) 73–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370813486865 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370813486865

Benenson, J. F. (1990) Gender Differences in Social Networks. Journal of Early Adolescence, 10, p. 472-495. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431690104004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431690104004

Bourdieu, Pierre (2000). Esquisse d’une théorie de la pratique. Paris: Seuil.

Brantingham, P. L & Brantingham, P. J. (1984) Nodes, paths and edges: Considerations on the complexity of crime and the physical environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 13 (1), p. 3 – 28. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80212-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80212-9

Brown, Lyn Mikel. (2003). Girlfighting: Betrayal and Rejection Among Girls. New York: New York University Press.

Burgess, Robert L. & Ronald L. Akers. (1966) A differential association-reinforcement theory of criminal behavior. Social problems 14(2), p. 128-147. https://doi.org/10.2307/798612 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/798612

Bursik & Webb. (1982) Community Change and Patterns of Delinquency. American Journal of Sociology, 88(1), p. 24 – 42 https://doi.org/10.1086/227632 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/227632

Farrington, D. P. & Loeber, R. (2000) Young children who commit crime: Epidemiology, developmental origins, risk factors, early interventions, and policy implications. Development and Psychopathology, 12 (4), p. 737 – 762 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579400004107 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579400004107

Gibbs, J. P. (1977). Social Control, Deterrence, and Perspectives on Social Order. Social Forces, Volume 56, Issue 2, 1, Pages 408–423 https://doi.org/10.2307/2577733 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2577733

Giddens, Anthony (1984). The constitution of society: an outline of theory of structuration. Oxford: Polity Press; Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

Granovetter, Mark (1973). The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78 (6), p. 1360-1380. https://doi.org/10.1086/225469 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/225469

____________ (1985). Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), p. 481-510. https://doi.org/10.1086/228311 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/228311

Hagan, John. 1993. “The Social Embeddedness of Crime and Unemployment.” Criminology 31:465-91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1993.tb01138.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1993.tb01138.x

Hawkins et al., 1998. A review of predictors of youth violence. In: Serious & violent juvenile offenders: Risk factors and successful interventions, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. p. 106-146. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452243740.n7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452243740.n7

Haynie, D. L., Doogan & Soller, B. (2014), Gender, friendship networks, and delinquency: a dynamic network approach. Criminology, 52, p. 688–722 https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12052 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12052

Jevons, Stanley (1888). The theory of political economy. London: MacMillan and Co. Lippincott.

Long, J. S. & Freese, J. (2001) Predicted probabilities for count models. The Stata Journal, 1 (1), p. 51-57 https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X0100100103 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X0100100103

Osgood et al., 1996 Routine Activities and Individual Deviant Behavior. American Sociological Association, 61 (4), p. 635 – 655. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096397 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2096397

Papachristos, A. V. (2014). The Network Structure of Crime. Sociology Compass 8/4, p. 347-357. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12147 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12147

Parsons, Talcott & Smelser, Neil (1956). Economy and Society: a study in the integration of economic and social theory. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.

Radil, S. M. et al. (2010). Spatializing Social Networks: Using Social Network Analysis to Investigate Geographies of Gang Rivalry, Territoriality, and Violence in Los Angeles. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, Volume 1000, Issue 2. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045600903550428 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00045600903550428

Rose, Amanda J., & Karen D. Rudolph. (2006). A review of sex differences in peer relationship processes: Potential trade-offs for the emotional and behavioral development of girls and boys. Psychological Bulletin 132, p. 98–131. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.98 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.98

Sampson & Laub, 1993 Turning Points in the Life Course: Why Change Matters to the Study of Crime. Criminology, 31 (3), p. 301 – 325 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1993.tb01132.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1993.tb01132.x

Sampson, R. (2012). Great American City: Chicago and the Enduring Neighborhood Effect. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226733883.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226733883.001.0001

Sutherland, Edwin H. (1947). Principles of Criminology, 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA: J. B.

Sutherland, Edwin H. & Cressey, Donald R. (1955). Principles of Criminology. 5th edition. J.B. Lippincott.

Thornberry T.P. & Krohn M.D. (2001). The Development of Delinquency. In: White S.O. (editors) Handbook of Youth and Justice. The Plenum Series in Crime and Justice. Springer, Boston, MA. p. 289 – 305. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1289-9_15 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1289-9_15

Vienna, 2019. UNODC, Global Study on Homicide, 2019.

Warr, M. (2002). Companions in Crime. The social aspect of social conduct. Cambridge, Univ. Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803956 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803956

Warr, M. & Stafford, (1991). The Influence of Delinquent Peers: What they think or what they do? Criminology, 29, p. 851–866. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1991.tb01090.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1991.tb01090.x

Warr, M. (1993). Age, Peers, and Delinquency. Criminology, 31, p. 17–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1993.tb01120.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1993.tb01120.x

Weerman, F. M. (2011). Delinquent peers in context: a longitudinal network analysis of selection and influence effects. Criminology. 49, p. 253–286. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2010.00223.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2010.00223.x

White, Harrison (2008). Identity and Control. How Social Formations Emerge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Wilcox P, Land KC, Hunt SA (2003). Criminal circumstance: a dynamic multicontextual criminal opportunity theory. Aldine de Gruyter, New York

Zimmerman, Gregory M. & Steven F. Messner. (2010). Neighborhood context and the gender gap in adolescent violent crime. American Sociological Review. 75, p. 958–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122410386688 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122410386688