Hybrid Courts and Multilevel Rules of Law: Some Overall Considerations, Challenges and Opportunities

Henrik Andersen

doi:10.6000/1929-4409.2017.06.12

Authors

Henrik Andersen Lancashire Law School, University of Central Lancashire, UK

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2017.06.12

Keywords:

International criminal law, Hybrid courts, Rule of law

Abstract

Hybrid courts are the third generation of international criminal bodies. Their hybrid nature makes them distinctive in the international judicial order. They combine domestic and international law; legal infrastructures; personnel at national and international level etc. They are praised in literature for overcoming resource and domestic legal infrastructural challenges and at the same time they stay close to the domestic legal order, and they satisfy the application of international criminal law in the specific cases. In addition, hybrid courts are instrumental in the process of transitional justice towards rule of law based societies. The concept of rule of law is contested. It can vaguely be defined as supremacy of law and it can be approached from various angles. The article claims that rule of law is a moral and/or political maxim with substantive values as it must provide both individuals and the public access to justice; it must provide a degree of equality of the subjects of law; it must provide predictability and legal certainty; it requires transparent procedures and impartial third party dispute mechanisms; and it must ensure the functionality of the legal system. Rule of law is further challenged when it is taken into the statist international sphere and into international criminal law. Where hybrid courts can serve the rule of law, they are also faced with rule of law challenges by governmental interference and by finding a balance between national and international law.

References

Agreement Between the United Nations and The Royal Government of Cambodia Concerning The Prosecution Under Cambodian Law of Crimes Committed During The Period Of Democratic Kampuchea, 2003, UN Treaty Collection, Number 41723, available at https://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/UNTS/ Volume%202329/Part/volume-2329-I-41723.pdf (retrieved 22 January 2017).

Andersen, Henrik, 2015, ’Protection of Non-Trade Values in WTO Appellate Body Jurisprudence: Exceptions, Economic Arguments, and Eluding Questions’, Journal of International Economic Law 18 (2), p. 383. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgv020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgv020

Andersen, Henrik, 2016, ‘China and the WTO Appellate Body’s Rule of Law’, Global Journal of Comparative Law 5, p.146. https://doi.org/10.1163/2211906X-00501007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/2211906X-00501007

Bassiouni, M. Cheriff, 1996, ‘International Crimes: Jus Cogens and Obligatio Erga Omnes.’ Law and Contemporary Problems 59 (4), p. 63. https://doi.org/10.2307/1192190 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1192190

Call, Charles T., 2004, ‘Is Transitional Justice Really Just?’, Brown Journal of World Affairs, XI (1), p. 101.

Craig, Paul, 1997, ‘Formal and Substantive Conceptions of the Rule of Law: An Analytical Framework’ Public Law, Autumn, p. 467.

General Assembly of the United Nations 2012, ‘Declaration of the high-level meeting of the General’, Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 24 September 2012, A/RES/67/1*

Grotius, 1631, De Jure Belli Ac Pacis Libri Tres, translated by Francis W. Kelsby, Buffalo, New York: William S. Hein & Co., Inc., 1995.

Guidance Note of the Secretary-General, 2010, United Nations Approach to Transitional Justice.

Hobbs, Harry, 2016, ‘Hybrid Tribunals and the Composition of the Court: In Search of Sociological Legitimacy’, Chicago Journal of International Law, 16 (2), pp. 482-522.

Jain, Neha, 2008, ‘Conceptualising Internationalisation in Hybrid Criminal Courts’, Singapore Year Book of International Law, 12, p. 81.

Jessberger, F.; Geneuss, J., 2012, ‘The Many Faces of the International Criminal Court’, Journal of International Criminal Justice 10 (5), p. 1081. https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqs070 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqs070

Kastner, P., 2015, ‘Domestic War Crimes Trials: Only for Others Bridging national and International Criminal Law’, University of Western Australia Law Review 39 (1), 29-50.

Kestenbaum, J.,2016, ‘Closing Impunity Gaps for the Crime of Aggression’, Chicago Journal of International Law 17(1), 51-79.

Lauterpacht, Hersch, 1933, The Function of Law in the International Community, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Morgenthau, Hans J., 1940, ‘Positivism, Functionalism, and International Law’, American Journal of International Law 34 (2), p. 260. https://doi.org/10.2307/2192998 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2192998

Nielsen, Elisabeth, 2010, ‘Hybrid International Criminal Tribunals: Political Interference and Judicial Independence’, UCLA J. Int’l L. Foreign Aff., 15 pp. 289-326.

Nouwen, Sarah M. H., 2006, ‘’Hybrid Courts’ – The Hybrid Category of a New Type of International Crimes Court’, Utrecht Law Review, 2 (2), p. 190. https://doi.org/10.18352/ulr.32 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18352/ulr.32

Rawls, John., 1999, A Theory of Justice, Revised ed., Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Raz, Jospeh, 2009, ‘The Rule of Law and its Virtue’, in Joseph Raz, The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality, 2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Secretary General of the United Nations, 2004, Report of the Secretary-General, The rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies, United Nations Security Council, S/2004/616, 23 August 2004.

Shraga, D.; Zacklin, R., 1996, ‘The International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda’, European Journal of International Law 7 (4), 501-518. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/7.4.501 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/7.4.501

Skov Kristensen, Henrik; Tamm, Ditlev, 2008, Dødsdømt – Flemming Helweg-Larsens beretning, Copenhagen: Gyldendahl.

South China Sea Arbitration, The Republic of the Philippines v The People’s Republic of China (South China Sea Arbitration), PCA Case Nº 2013-19, Award by the Arbitral Tribunal on 12 July 2016.

Statute of the Special Tribunal for Lebanon, available at STL’s website; https://www.stl-tsl.org/en/documents/statute-of-the-tribunal/223-statute-of-the-special-tribunal-for-lebanon (retrieved 22 January 2017).

Statute of The Special Court for Sierra Leone, available at SCSL’s website; http://www.rscsl.org/Documents/scsl-statute.pdf (retrieved 22 January 2017).

United Nations Security Council Resolution 1315 (2000), Adopted by the Security Council at its 4186th meeting, on 14 August 2000, S/RES/1315 (2000).

van der Wilt, H., 2013, ‘Domestic Courts' Contribution to the Development of International Criminal Law: Some Reflections’, Israel Law Review 46 (2), 207-232. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021223713000046 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021223713000046

Vitoria, F. 1991,‘On the American Indians (De Indis)’ in A. Pagden & J. Lawrance, (eds), Vitoria – Political Writing, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840944.012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840944

World Justice Project 2016, Rule of Law Index, retrieved 27/11/2016: http://worldjusticeproject.org/sites/default/files/media/wjp_rule_of_law_index_2016.pdf