Police Reform in Thailand Post-2006

Authors

  • Krisanathong Poothakool The President of Criminology and Criminal Justice Administration Program, Rangsit University, Thailand
  • Tony Glendinning Director of MRes in Social Research Program, Aberdeen University, UK, and Criminology and Criminal Justice Administration Program, Rangsit University, Thailand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2013.02.35

Keywords:

Royal Thai Police, police reform, devolved management, police accountability, community-oriented policing, police culture, political interference

Abstract

The study analyses the operation and culture of Thai policing and the intersection between policing and politics framed by the recommendations of the Police Reform Committee (PRC), 2006—2007. The PRC’s priorities were: devolving police administration, especially budgets and personnel management; increasing accountability, especially establishing an Independent Complaints’ Committee; and civilianization. Those priorities were seen as clearing the ground for development of community-oriented policing longer-term. Interviews were conducted with senior members of the PRC. Afterwards non-commissioned officers’ opinions were established through a countrywide survey and follow-up in-depth interviews. Their station chiefs were also interviewed. According to PRC members and serving officers’ accounts the barriers to reform of police administration were political interference and nepotism, especially corruption of appointments, nominations, promotions and transfers. Local policing often involved further interference by informal networks of officials, politicians and business. The PRC’s recommendations were shelved due to an unfavourable political climate. The paradox was the PRC’s strategies for ‘democratic’ police reform were well-informed and well-founded but its establishment had been politically motivated and it was not immune to interference by competing political factions. The study contributes to debates about moving away from authoritarian policing models in the developing world by analysing barriers to the reform of police administration in the Thai context.

References

Baker, Chris and Pasuk Phongpaichit. 2009. A History of Thailand, Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139194877 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139194877

Bayley, David H.2006.Changing the Guard: Developing Democratic Police Aboard. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bayley, David H and Robert Perito. 2011. ‘Police Corruption: What Past Scandals Teach Us About Current Challenges.’ Washington DC: Institute of Peace. Available at: http://www.usip.org/files/resources/SR%20294.pdf (accessed March23 2012).

Brewer, John D. 1993.‘Sensitivity as a Problem in Field Research: a Study of Routine Policing in Northern Ireland.’ Pp. 125-46 in Researching Sensitive Topics edited by C.M Renzetti and R.M. Lee. London, Sage.

Brewer, John D. and Albert Hunter.2006.Foundations of Multimethod Research: Synthesizing Styles. London, Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412984294

Callahan, William A. 2005. ‘The Discourse of Vote Buying and Political Reform in Thailand.’ Pacific Affairs 78(1): 95-113. http://dx.doi.org/10.5509/200578195 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5509/200578195

Chaloemtiarana, Thak. 2007.Thailand: The Politics of Despotic Paternalism, Second edition. Ithaca, NY: Southeast Asia Program, Cornell University. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501721106

Connors, Michael K.1999, ‘Political Reform and the State in Thailand.’ Journal of Contemporary Asia 29(4): 202–26.Re-published in Politics of Modern Southeast Asia edited byA. Hicken. London, Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00472339980000321 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00472339980000321

Connors, Michael K. 2008.‘Article of Faith: the Failure of Royal Liberalism in Thailand.’ Journal of Contemporary Asia 38(1): 143-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00472330701652000 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00472330701652000

Connors, Michael K. and Kevin Hewison.2008. ‘Thailand’s “Good Coup”: the Fall of Thaksin, the Military and Democracy.’ Journal of Contemporary Asia 38(1): 1–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00472330701651929 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00472330701651929

Dejkunjorn, Vasit. 1987. Savage Inspector [Salawateurn]. Bangkok, Matichon.

Dejkunjorn, Vasit. 1994. Chief Inspector [Salawatyai]. Bangkok, Matichon.

Dejkunjorn, Vasit. 1996. Special Branch [Santibarn]. Bangkok, Matichon.

Davis, Robert C., Nicole J. Henderson and Cybele Merrick. 2003.‘Community Policing: Variations on the Western Model in the Developing World.’ Police Practice and Research 4(3):285–300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1561426032000113870 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1561426032000113870

Fineman, Daniel. 1997. A Special Relationship: The United States and Military Government in Thailand, 1947 to 1958.Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.

Kittiyaluck, Kittipong. 2007. Police Reform: Please Listen Again. Bangkok, Matichon.

Laothamas, Anek. 1992.Business Associations and the New Political Economy of Thailand: From Bureaucratic Polity to Liberal Corporatism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

McCargo, Duncan. 2000. Politics and the Press in Thailand: Media Machinations. London: Routledge.

McCargo, Duncan. 2004. ‘Buddhism, Democracy and Identity in Thailand. ’Democratization 11(4):155-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1351034042000234576 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1351034042000234576

McCargo, Duncan. 2005.‘Network Monarchy and Legitimacy Crises in Thailand.’ The Pacific Review18(4):499-519. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09512740500338937 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09512740500338937

McCargo, Duncan. 2006. ‘Rethinking Thailand’s Southern Violence. ’Critical Asian Studies 38(1):3-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14672710600556395 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14672710600556395

McCargo, Duncan and Ukrist. Pathmanand. 2005. The Thaksinization of Thailand: Thaksin’s Political Discourse. Copenhagen, Denmark: Nordic Institute of Asian Studies Press.

McVey, Ruth. 2000. Money and Power in Provincial Thailand. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.

Ockey, James. 1998. ‘Crime, Society and Politics in Thailand.’ Pp. 39-53 in Gangsters, Democracy and the State in Southeast Asia edited by C. A. Trocki. New York, NY: Southeast Asia Program Cornell University.

O’Neill, Megan, Monique Marks and Anne-Marie Singh. 2007. Police Occupational Culture: New Debates and Directions. Oxford: Elsevier Press.

Phongpaichit, Pasukand Chris Baker. 2004. Thaksin: the Business of Politics in Thailand. Chiang Mai, Thailand: Silkworm Books.

Phongpaichit, Pasuk and Sungsidh Piriyarangsan. 1996. Corruption and Democracy in Thailand, Second edition. Chiang Mai, Thailand, Silkworm Books.

Pino, Nathanand Michael D. Wiatrowski. 2006. Democratic Policing in Transitional and Developing Countries, Burlington, VT: Ashgate.

PRC, Police Reform Committee. 2009. Police Reform in Thailand. Nonthaburi, Bangkok: Ministry of Home Affairs.

Roberts, Simon and Claire Provost. 2011. ‘Corruption Index 2011 from Transparency International: Find Out How Countries Compare.’ Available at: http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/ datablog/2011/dec/01/corruption-index-2011-transparency-international(accessed June4 2012).

Skolnick, Jerome H. and David. H. Bayley. 1988. Themes and Variations in Community Policing. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Suriyasarn, Busakorn and Christopher G. Moore. 2006. In His Majesty’s Footsteps: a Personal Memoir by Vasit Dejkunjorn. Bangkok: Heaven Lake Press

Tamada, Yoshifumi. 1991. ‘Itthiphon and Amnat: an Informal Aspect of Thai Politics.’ Southeast Asian Studies28(4): 455-66.

World Bank. 2011. Available at http://siteresources.worldbank.org/ DATASTATISTICS/Resources/GNIPC.pdf (accessed May6 2012).

World Bank. 2012. Available at: http://www.worldbank.org/en/ country/thailand (accessed May6 2012).

WVS-Thailand. 2007.‘World Values Survey Official Data File v.20090901.’ World Values Survey Association, www.worldvaluessurvey.org

Downloads

Published

2013-09-09

How to Cite

Poothakool, K., & Glendinning, T. (2013). Police Reform in Thailand Post-2006. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 2, 371–384. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2013.02.35

Issue

Section

Articles