Optimising Nanoparticle Dispersion Time for Enhanced Thermomechanical Properties in DGEBA-Based Shape Memory Polymer Composites

Janitha  Jeewantha; Jayantha  Epaarachchi; Md Mainul  Islam

doi:10.6000/1929-5995.2024.13.17

Authors

Janitha Jeewantha Centre for Future Materials, Institute for Advanced Engineering and Space Sciences, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Australia and School of Engineering, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Australia
Jayantha Epaarachchi Centre for Future Materials, Institute for Advanced Engineering and Space Sciences, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Australia and School of Engineering, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Australia
Md Mainul Islam Centre for Future Materials, Institute for Advanced Engineering and Space Sciences, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Australia and School of Engineering, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Australia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-5995.2024.13.17

Keywords:

Shape memory polymer, sonication, nanoparticles, DGEB, mechanical properties

Abstract

Shape-memory polymers (SMPs) are smart materials that can change shape upon an external stimulus. This phenomenon is called the shape memory effect (SME), which is caused by entropy change due to rapid molecular motion in the polymer segments. Due to the inherently weak thermomechanical properties, use of SMPs is limited in many engineering applications. Therefore, SMPs are often reinforced with fibres and nanoparticles (NPs). NPs offered greater flexibility due to their superior physical, chemical, electrical, mechanical, and thermal properties. However, the homogeneous distribution of NPs is crucial for composition’s stability and enhancement of the base material’s properties. Among the different techniques used for dispersing NPs, ultrasonic irradiation has shown excellent emulsifying and crushing performance. The sonication process is essential for mitigating agglomerates; however, prolonged sonication time probably increases epoxy temperature, micro-bubbles, cavitation, breaking apart molecules and finally degrading the epoxy resin performances. This paper provides critical insight of nanoparticle dispersion into diglycidyl ether of bisphenol A epoxies (DGEBA). DGEBA epoxy resin was added to TiO₂ NPs and sonicated for 60 min with 5 min intervals while the temperature of epoxy was maintained below 60^oC by using a water cooling throughout the sonication process. The process parameters such as amplitude, mode, epoxy volume and the weight percentage of NPs were kept constant. After each sonication step, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) was performed using Thermo Scientific™ and analysed through OMNIC™ Professional quantitation software. In accordance with FTIR results, until 30 min of the sonication, DGEBA resin was not degraded. In order to confirm the performances and the reinforcing effect of NPs, thermo-mechanical and shape memory properties were compared with the neat specimen. The outcomes of this research have suggested quick guidance to find optimum NP dispersion time for DGEBA resins, which has been hardly studied before.

References

Herath H, et al. Structural performance and photothermal recovery of carbon fibre reinforced shape memory polymer. Composites Science and Technology 2018; 167: 206-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.07.042

Ming G, et al. Shape memory cyclic behavior and mechanical durability of woven fabric reinforced shape memory polymer composites. Composites Science and Technology 2024; 110866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2024.110866

Zhang F, et al. Nano/microstructures of shape memory polymers: from materials to applications. Nanoscale Horizons 2020; 5(8): 1155-1173. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0NH00246A

Gunderson A, et al. Programming-via-Spinning: Electrospun Shape Memory Polymer Fibers with Simultaneous Fabrication and Programming. Smart Materials in Medicine 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smaim.2024.09.002

Liu Y, et al. Recent Progress in Shape Memory Polymer Composites: Driving Modes, Forming Technologies, and Applications. Composites Communications 2024; 102062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coco.2024.102062

Liu T, Zhong J. Effect of dispersion of nano-inorganic particles on the properties of polymer nanocomposites. in IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 2019; IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/563/2/022026

Hu J. Shape memory polymers: fundamentals, advances and applications 2014. https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857098542.47

Torrens F, Castellano G. Bisphenol, diethylstilbestrol, polycarbonate and the thermomechanical properties of epoxy–silica nanostructured composites. Journal of Research Updates in Polymer Science 2013; 2(4): 183. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-5995.2013.02.04.1

Zheng J, et al. Mechanical properties and thermal characteristics of three nano-filler/silk fiber reinforced hybrid composites: A comparative study using a ductile epoxy resin matrix. Polymer Testing 2024; 130: 108319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2023.108319

Hamming LM, et al. Effects of dispersion and interfacial modification on the macroscale properties of TiO2 polymer–matrix nanocomposites. Composites Science and Technology 2009; 69(11-12): 1880-1886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.04.005

Guo S-Y, et al. Preparation of TiO2/epoxy resin composite and its effect on mechanical and bonding properties of OPC mortars. Construction and Building Materials 2021; 272: 121960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121960

Anane-Fenin K, Akinlabi ET, Perry N. A method for the quantification of nanoparticle dispersion in nanocomposites based on fractal dimension. In Advances in material sciences and engineering. Springer 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8297-0_57

González MG, Cabanelas JC, Baselga J. Applications of FTIR on epoxy resins-identification, monitoring the curing process, phase separation and water uptake. Infrared Spectroscopy-Materials Science, Engineering and Technology 2012; 2: 261-284. https://doi.org/10.5772/36323