Real Oil Prices, Real Economic Activity, Real Interest Rates, and the US Dollar: A Cointegration Analysis with Structural Breaks

Authors

  • Go Tamakoshi Kobe University
  • Shigeyuki Hamori Kobe University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-7092.2012.01.4

Keywords:

Oil price, cointegration test with structural breaks, Granger causality, Kilian economic index, interest rate

Abstract

Abstract: In this paper, we examine the relationship among real oil prices, global economic activity, real value of the US dollar, and real interest rates during the period 1988:1 to 2011:12. We employ the Gregory and Hansen (1996) cointegration test with structural breaks to investigate the long-run equilibrium and analyze the short-term Granger causality as well. Our findings indicate that real oil prices are cointegrated with the three factors mentioned above and are affected positively by real economic activity and negatively by real interest rates and the real value of the US dollar. We also find significant short-run causality from real economic activity to real oil prices, but no significant causality from real interest rate and real value of US dollar to real oil price is detected. These findings are relevant for both policymakers and investors who wish to conduct forecasts for future oil prices on the basis of a solid understanding of its key drivers.

Author Biographies

Go Tamakoshi, Kobe University

Graduate School of Economics

Shigeyuki Hamori, Kobe University

Faculty of Economics

References

Akram, Farooq Q. 2009. “Commodity prices, interest and the dollar.” Energy Economics, 31:838-51.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2009.05.016
Askari, Hossein. and Krichene, Noureddine. 2008. “Oil price dynamics (2002-2006).” Energy Economics, 30:2134-2153.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2007.12.004
Frankel, Jeffery A. 2006. “The effect of monetary policy on real commodity prices.” NBER Working Paper 12713.
Gately, Dermot. and Huntington, Hillard G. 2002. “The asymmetric effects of changes in price and income on energy and oil demand.” The Energy Journal, 1:19-35.
Gregory, Allan W. and Hansen, Bruce E. 1996. “Residual-based tests for cointegration in models with regime shifts.” Journal of Econometrics, 70: 99-126.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(69)41685-7
Griffin, James. and Schulman, Craig T. 2005. “Price asymmetry in energy demand models: a proxy for energy-saving technical change.” The Energy Journal, 26:1-21.
He, Yanan, Wang, Shouyang, and Lai, Kin Keung. 2010. “Global economic activity and crude oil prices: A cointegration analysis.” Energy Economics, 32: 868-76.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2009.12.005
Johansen, Soren. 1988. “Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors.” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12: 231-54.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0165-1889(88)90041-3
Kilian, Lutz. 2009. “Not all oil price shocks are alike: disentangling demand and supply shocks in the crude oil market.” American Economic Review, 99: 1053-69.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.99.3.1053
Krichene, Noureddine. 2006. “World crude oil markets: monetary policy and the recent oil shock.” WP/06/62, International Monetary Fund.
Working, Holbrook. 1949. “The theory and price of storage.” American Economic Review, 39: 1254-62.

Downloads

Published

2012-11-06

How to Cite

Tamakoshi, G., & Hamori, S. (2012). Real Oil Prices, Real Economic Activity, Real Interest Rates, and the US Dollar: A Cointegration Analysis with Structural Breaks. Journal of Reviews on Global Economics, 1, 41–46. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-7092.2012.01.4

Issue

Section

Articles