A Digital Diagnosis Tool for Children with Dyslexia against Similar Criteria DSM-5
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6000/2292-2598.2023.11.01.6Keywords:
Digital diagnosis tool, children, dyslexia, criteria, DSM-5Abstract
Background: we stand on the fact that what makes diagnosing dyslexia difficult is that students with dyslexia are of very normal or even extraordinary intelligence. It is important to prepare a tool that enables the initial diagnosis of this disorder, and in the light of its results, a report is formulated on the degree of injury of the person being tested.
Aims: The aim is to develop a reliable and validated tool for children with dyslexia.
Methods: A convenience sampling method was used to select children aged 4-8 years as the study population. Inclusion criteria were (1) age between 4 and 8 years; (2) be able to speak; and (3) Keep attending kindergarten and school. Children's parents and teachers were given full information about the study, and all signed an informed written consent form. Ninety children were included in this study. Word spelling Test, Letter rapid automatized naming Test, Recognition of a first sound test, Deletion of a first sound test, Blending test, and Segmentation test was developed and used.
Findings: The content validity of all tests was measured. The correlation coefficients between each subscale and the total scale ranged from 0.54 to 0.58.
Conclusion: This tool is expected to assist teachers in identifying, accurately assessing, and formulating a learning program that fits the abilities and needs of the children.
References
American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistic manual of mental disorders. Washington DC, APA 2013. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596
Eissa M. The Effect of A Phonological Awareness Intervention Program on Phonological Memory, Phonological Sensitivity, and Metaphonological Abilities of Preschool Children at-Risk for Reading Disabilities. Psycho-Educational Research Reviews 2014; 3(2): 71-83. Retrieved from https://perrjournal.com/index.php/perrjournal/article/view/359
Eissa M. Are Phonological Awareness Intervention Programs Effective for Children with Disabilities? A Systematic Review. Psycho-Educational Research Reviews 2017a; 6(3): 11-22. Retrieved from https://perrjournal.com/index.php/perrjournal/ article/view/259
Sarti D, De Salvatore M, Granocchio E, Chieffo DPR, Antonietti A. Dyslexia telerehabilitation during the COVID-19 pandemic: Results of a rhythm-based intervention for reading. Children 2021; 8(11): 1011. https://doi.org/10.3390/children8111011
Mostafa AA. The Effect of Using Multiple Intelligences on Some Basic Reading Skills of First Graders At-Risk for Reading Disabilities. Psycho-Educational Research Reviews 2017; 6(3): 109-116. Retrieved from https://perrjournal.com/ index.php/perrjournal/article/view/267
Elhoweris H. The Impact of Repeated Reading Intervention on Improving Reading Fluency and Comprehension of Emirati Students with Learning Disabilities. Psycho-Educational Research Reviews 2017; 6(2): 36-48. Retrieved from https://perrjournal.com/index.php/perrjournal/article/ view/274
Özkan UB. The Relationship between Digital Reading Disposition and Internet-based Reading Motivation: A Study on Pre-service Teachers. Psycho-Educational Research Reviews 2022; 11(2): 172-183. https://doi.org/10.52963/PERR_Biruni_V11.N2.11
Eissa MA. The Effectiveness of a Self Regulated Learning- Based Training Program on Improving Cognitive and Metacognitive EFL Reading Comprehension of 9th Graders with Reading Disabilities. Psycho-Educational Research Reviews 2015; 4(3): 49. Retrieved from https://perrjournal.com/index.php/perrjournal/article/view/323
Elhoweris H. The Impact of Repeated Reading Intervention on Improving Reading Fluency and Comprehension of Emirati Students with Learning Disabilities. Psycho-Educational Research Reviews 2017; 6(2): 36-48. Retrieved from https://perrjournal.com/index.php/perrjournal/article/ view/274
Mostafa AA. The Effect of Using Multiple Intelligences on Some Basic Reading Skills of First Graders At-Risk for Reading Disabilities. Psycho-Educational Research Reviews 2017; 6(3): 109. Retrieved from https://perrjournal.com/ index.php/perrjournal/article/view/267
Gomaa OMK. The Effect of Reciprocal Teaching Intervention Strategy on Reading Comprehension Skills of 5th Grade Elementary School Students with Reading Disabilities. Psycho-Educational Research Reviews 2015; 4(2): 39-45. Retrieved from https://perrjournal.com/index.php/perrjournal/ article/view/330
Hendi WFA. The Effect of Concept Maps on Reading Comprehension Skills of Elementary School Students with Reading Disabilities. Psycho-Educational Research Reviews 2015; 4(2): 46-51. Retrieved from https://perrjournal.com/ index.php/perrjournal/article/view/331
Banna AES. The Effects of Multiple Intelligences Training Program on Improving Reading Comprehension Skills of Reading of the Disabled Primary Six Students. Psycho-Educational Research Reviews 2019; 8(1): 64-69. Retrieved from https://perrjournal.com/index.php/perrjournal/article/ view/194
Tepetaş C, Şule G, Erol D. Validity And Reliability Study of the Parent-Child Shared Book Reading Inventory. Psycho-Educational Research Reviews 2021; 10(2): 328-350. https://doi.org/10.52963/PERR_Biruni_V10.N2.23
Tanju Aslışen EH, Hakkoymaz S. The Role Of Speaking Self-Sufficiency And Problematic Internet Use In Predicting Prospective Teachers’ Reading Habits. Psycho-Educational Research Reviews 2022; 11(1): 300-311. https://doi.org/10.52963/PERR_Biruni_V11.N1.19
Lindstrom JH. Dyslexia in the Schools: Assessment and Identification. Teaching Exceptional Children 2019; 51(3): 189-200. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059918763712
Eissa M, Samir E. Dyslexia in Children "Intervention and Treatment" Guide for Teachers and Parents, Cairo, House of knowledge and faith for publication and distribution 2020.
Eissa M, Khalifa W. Remedial programs for people with reading difficulties and dyslexia. Alex., Dar Al Wafaa 2019.
Anuradha D. A study on the challenges faced by dyslexic children. Science, Education, and Innovations in the context of modern problems 2022; 5(3): 389-400.
Darama E, Karaduman F, Kahraman K. Evaluation of 5th Grade English Curriculum According to Stufflebeam’s Context, Input, Process, Product (CIPP) Model. Psycho-Educational Research Reviews 2018; 7(2): 73-86. Retrieved from https://perrjournal.com/index.php/perrjournal/article/view/241
Sawi RAS. Preventing Early Reading Disabilities in Preschool Children At-Risk for Reading Failure: A Phonological Awareness-Based Program. Psycho-Educational Research Reviews 2013; 2(1): 13-22. Retrieved from https://perrjournal.com/index.php/perrjournal/article/ view/383
Eissa MA. Issues related to identification of children with specific learning disorders (SLDs): insights into DSM-5. Psycho-Educational Research Reviews 2018; 7(1): 106. Retrieved from https://perrjournal.com/index.php/perrjournal/ article/view/254
Banna AES, Eissa Saad MA. Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: Insights from DSM-5. Psycho-Educational Research Reviews 2019; 8(Special Issue): 25-29. Retrieved from https://perrjournal.com/index.php/perrjournal/article/ view/169
Wagner RK, Zirps FA, Wood SG, Developmental Dyslexia, The Science of Reading 2022; 416-438. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119705116.ch19
Miller GJ, Lewis BA. Reading Skills in Children With Suspected Childhood Apraxia of Speech and Children With Reading Disorders: Same or Different? Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools 2022; 53(4): 985-1005. https://doi.org/10.1044/2022_LSHSS-21-00149
Kalashnikova M, Goswami U, Burnham D. Novel word learning deficits in infants at family risk for dyslexia. Dyslexia 2020; 26(1): 3-17. https://doi.org/10.1002/dys.1649
Richardson U, Leppänen PH, Leiwo M, Lyytinen H. Speech perception of infants with high familial risk for dyslexia differ at the age of 6 months. Dev Neuropsychol 2003; 23(3): 385-97. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326942DN2303_5
Leppänen PH, Richardson U, Pihko E, Eklund KM, Guttorm TK, Aro M, Lyytinen H. Brain responses to changes in speech sound durations differ between infants with and without familial risk for dyslexia. Dev Neuropsychol 2002; 22(1): 407-22. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326942dn2201_4
Sawi R. Preventing Early Reading Disabilities in Preschool Children At-Risk for Reading Failure: A Phonological Awareness-Based Program. Psycho-Educational Research Reviews 2013; 2(1): 13-22. Retrieved from https://perrjournal.com/index.php/perrjournal/article/view/383
Mohammed A. Phonological awareness and rapid automatized naming as predictors of early literacy skills among children with mild to borderline intellectual functioning, Appl Neuropsychol Child 2022; 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622965.2022.2106863
Conway PF, Amberson J. Laptops meets schools, one-one draw: m-learning for secondary students with literacy difficulties. Support Learn 2011; 26(4): 173-81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9604.2011.01497.x
Kast M, Baschera GM, Gross M, Jancke L, Meyer M. Computer-based learning of spelling skills in children with and without dyslexia. Ann Dyslexia 2011; 61(2): 177-200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-011-0052-2
Al-Barhamtoshy, Motaweh DEM. Diagnosis of Dyslexia using Computing Analysis. Journal of Engineering Technology 2017; 6(2): 462-482. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIHT.2017.7899141
Brookes G, Veronica N, Boon HL, Wah PT, Lukito N. The Computerised-based Lucid Rapid Dyslexia Screening for the identification of children at risk of Dyslexia: A Singapore study. Educational and Child Psychology 2011; 28(2): 110-124. https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsecp.2011.28.2.33
Sood MR, Toornstra A, Sereno MI, Boland M, Filaretti D, Sood A. A Digital App to Aid Detection, Monitoring, and Management of Dyslexia in Young Children (DIMMAND): Protocol for a Digital Health and Education Solution. JMIR Res Protoc 2018; 7(5): e135. https://doi.org/10.2196/resprot.9583
Rauschenberger M, Baeza-Yates R, Rello L. A Universal Screening Tool for Dyslexia by a Web-Game and Machine Learning. Front Comput Sci 2022; 3: 628634. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2021.628634
Bloodgood JW. What's in a name? Children's name writing and literacy acquisition. Reading Research Quarterly 1999; 34(3): 342–367. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.34.3.5
Reis A, Araújo S, Morais IS, Faísca L. Reading and reading-related skills in adults with dyslexia from different orthographic systems: A review and meta-analysis. Annals of Dyslexia 2020; 70(3): 339-368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-020-00205-x
McGrath LM, Peterson RL, Pennington BF. The multiple deficit model: Progress, problems, and prospects. Scientific Studies of Reading 2020; 24(1): 7-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2019.1706180