Impact of Convergence of Smart-Technology as Compared to Traditional Methodological Tools on Fostering Cognitive Aspects of Leadership Competencies in the Process of Vocational Training of Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6000/2292-2598.2019.07.01.1Keywords:
Cognitive skills of leadership, smart technology, traditional mode of education, vocational training, tertiary institution.Abstract
The main objective of this research is to explore how effective and efficient the convergent use of traditional and smart technology tools could be when deployed in fostering leadership competencies of the students in the settings of tertiary vocational education. The experiment involved the students of two universities doing the elective course “Do Better Your Leadership Skills Up”. Having been split up into two halves, the first part of the focus group used the traditional forms of educational process, while the second one additionally used the software like CogniFit, Lumosity, BrainHQ, NeuroNation, Brain Metrix, Eidetic, Fit Brains, BrainExer 2.0. At the entry stage, the pedagogic surveys had been used as well as the cognitive function test to study the cognitive capabilities of the focus group students. We used a multi method approach of combining the close-ended and open-ended questions to get the feedback and the above cognitive test to measure the output of the study. Quantitative methods had been used to analyze the data and such Covariance-based Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) software as SPSS AMOS had been applied to evaluate the results because cognitive function of a person includes sub-components of latent constructs. Textalyzer software had been used to process the students’ responses to open-ended questions of the questionnaire for the most commonly used positive words in the texts, which helped us to identify broad categories of responses. Here, the most commonly used words we had distinguished were “involvement”, “improvement”, “gamification”, “motivation”, “speed”, “concentration”, “memory”, “current studies”, “future job”. Then we distributed the answers by the frequency of the identified words. The responses, which fell under no category, had been analyzed manually. The experimentally obtained data shows that integration of the smart technology into traditional learning environment increases students’ involvement by 23%, personal transformation by 18% and motivation by 17%. Our study proves that the convergent mode of instruction brings more benefits to the students in terms of fostering cognitive aspects of leadership competencies in the process of vocational training than the traditional mode. We found that the converged pedagogical mode enhances the collaboration and involvement of all the stakeholders of educational process. It makes students achieve the greatest personal satisfaction through enhanced self-esteem, efficiency gains, a sense of continuous personal achievement and enhanced autonomy and experimenting with their own learning strategies. We suggest universities (of Ukraine, specifically) to provide training to the teachers with all the latest technology, which seems essential for teaching. Academic institutions (of Ukraine) should also invest into research in the area of the educational-purpose use of smart technology.
References
Dawson S. ‘Seeing’ the learning community: An exploration of the development of a resource for monitoring online student networking. Br J Educ Technol 2010; 41(5): 736-752. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00970.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00970.x
Hämäläinen R, Cattaneo A. New TEL Environments for Vocational Education–Teacher’s Instructional Perspective. Vocations and learning 2015; 8(2): 135-157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-015-9128-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-015-9128-1
Billett S, Choy S. Learning through work: Emerging perspectives and new challenges. J Workplace Learn 2013; 25(4): 264-276. https://doi.org/10.1108/13665621311316447 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/13665621311316447
Engle RW, Kane MJ, Tuholski SW. Individual differences in working memory capacity and what they tell us about controlled attention, general fluid intelligence, and functions of the prefrontal cortex. In: Miyake A, Shah P, editors. Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press 1999; pp. 102-134. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174909.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174909.007
Cowan N, Elliott EM, Scott Saults J, Morey CC, Mattox S, Hismjatullina A, Conway AR. On the capacity of attention: Its estimation and its role in working memory and cognitive aptitudes. Cogn Psychol 2005; 51(1): 42-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2004.12.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2004.12.001
Gathercole SE, Pickering SJ, Knight C, Stegmann Z. Working Memory Skills and Educational Attainment: Evidence from National Curriculum Assessments at 7 and 14 Years of Age. Appl Cogn Psychol 2004; 18(1): 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.934 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.934
Engle RW, Tuholski SW, Laughlin JE, Conway ARA. Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: A latent-variable approach. J Exp Psychol Gen 1999; 128(3): 309-331. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.128.3.309 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-3445.128.3.309
Dries N, Pepermans R. How to Identify Leadership Potential: Development and Testing of a Consensus Model. HRMJ 2012; 51(3): 361-385. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21473 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21473
Yukl G. Managerial Leadership: A Review of Theory and Research. Journal of Management 1989; 15(2): 251-289. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638901500207 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638901500207
Zaccaro SJ. Trait-based Perspectives of Leadership. Am Psychol 2007; 62(1): 6-16. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.62.1.6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.62.1.6
Gundelsweiler F, Filk C. Future media platforms for convergence journalism. At the interface/Probing the Boundaries 2012; 83: 45-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401208536_005
Mumford MD, Zaccaro SJ, Harding FD, Jacobs TO, Fleishman EA. Leadership Skills for a Changing World: Solving Complex Social Problems. Leadersh Q 2000; 11(1): 11-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(99)00041-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(99)00041-7
Kim M, Kim S, Khera O, Getman J. The experience of three flipped classrooms in an urban university: An exploration of design principles. Internet & Higher Education 2014; 22: 37-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.04.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.04.003
Food for the Brain. The Cognitive Function Test. [cited 2018 Oct 8]: Available from: https://cft.foodforthebrain.org/
Deutscher V, Winther E. Instructional sensitivity in vocational education. Learn Instr 2017; 53: 21-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.07.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.07.004
Lin KY, Lu HP. Why people use social networking sites: An empirical study integrating network externalities and motivation theory. Comput Human Behav 2011; 27(3): 1152-1161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.12.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.12.009
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
