Reaching the Hard to Reach: Mobile Development Screening Van to the Rescue

Joannie Busillo-Aguayo; Wendy Murawski; Ivor Weiner

doi:10.6000/2292-2598.2015.03.04.11

Authors

Joannie Busillo-Aguayo California State University, Northridge, CA, USA
Wendy Murawski California State University, Northridge, CA, USA
Ivor Weiner California State University, Northridge, CA, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/2292-2598.2015.03.04.11

Keywords:

Developmental screenings, low-income, mobile screening, early childhood, community collaboration

Abstract

Currently more than 15% of children have an emotional, behavioral, or developmental concern. In spite of recommendations by the American Academy of Pediatrics and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to conduct universal developmental surveillance and screening with children at 9, 18, and 24 months of age, fewer than 30% of children under 6 years of age ever receive a developmental screening. Children in low-income and diverse communities are even less likely to be screened by a medical provider and/or referred for further diagnostic evaluation when predictive concerns are identified. As part of a cross-agency collaborative effort involving a family resource center, a child care resource and referral agency, a regional center for developmental disabilities, and a master's degree program in early childhood education, the Mobile Developmental Screening Van Project conducted outreach to provide free developmental screening with families of children 0-8 years of age in diverse and low-income communities within the greater Los Angeles County. Using the Parent Evaluation of Developmental Status (PEDS) screening tool, 94 children were screened over the course of 6 months, with 33% showing 2 or more predictive concerns that resulted in referrals for further diagnostic evaluation. The feasibility of reaching families in hard to reach communities using a mobile screening van, as well as study limitations and recommendations for next steps, are discussed.

References

Shonkoff JP, Garner AS. The lifelong effects of early childhood adversity and toxic stress. Pediatrics 2012; 129: 232-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2011-2663 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2011-2663

Fox SE, Levitt P, Nelson CA. How the timing and quality of early experiences influence the development of brain architecture. Child Dev 2010; 81: 28-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01380.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01380.x

Shonkoff JP, Richter L, van der Gaag J, Bhutta ZA. An integrated scientific framework for child survival and early childhood development. Pediatrics 2012; 129: 460-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2011-0366 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2011-0366

Johnson CP, Myers SM. Identification and evaluation of children with autism spectrum disorders. Pediatrics 2007; 120: 1183-215. http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2007-2361 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2007-2361

Heckman J, Pinto R, Savelyev P. Understanding the mechanisms through which an influential early childhood program boosted adult outcomes. Am Econ Rev 2013; 103: 2051-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.103.6.2052 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.103.6.2052

Hyson M, Tomlinson HB. The early years matter: education, care, and the well-being of children, birth to 8. New York: Teachers College Press 2014.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Prevalence of autism spectrum disorder among children aged 8 years—autism and developmental disabilities monitoring network. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Surveill Summ 2014; 63(2): 1-21.

Radecki L, Sand-Loud N, O’Connor KG, Shapr S, Olson LM. Trends in the use of standardized tools for developmental screening in early childhood: 2002-2009. Pediatrics 2011; 128: 14-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010-2180 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010-2180

King TM, Tandon SD, Macias MM, Healy JA, Duncan PM, Swigonski NL, Skipper SM, Lipkin PH. Implementing developmental screeing and referrals: lessons learned from a national project. Pediatrics 2010; 125(2): 350-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2009-0388 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2009-0388

Shattuck PT, Durkin M, Maenner M, Newschaffer C, Mandell DS, Wiggins L, et al. The timing of identification among children with an autism spectrum disorder: findings from a population-based surveillance study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2009; 48(4): 474-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CHI.0b013e31819b3848 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/CHI.0b013e31819b3848

Rosenberg SA, Robinson CC, Shaw EF, Ellison MC. Percent eligible versus served. Pediatrics 2013; 131: 38-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2012-1662 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2012-1662

Bricker D, Macy M, Squires J, Marks K, Eds. Developmental screening in your community: an integrated approach for connecting children with services. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes 2013.

Roux AM, Herrera P, Wold CM, Dunkle MC, Glascoe FP, Shattuck PT. Developmental and autism screening through 2-1-1: reaching underserved families. Am J Prev Med 2012; 43(6 Suppl 5): S457-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2012.08.011

Mandell DS, Wiggins LD, Carpenter LA, Daniels J, DiGuiseppi C, Durkin MS, et al. Racial/ethnic disparities in the identification of children with autism spectrum disorders. Am J Public Health 2009; 99: 493-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2007.131243 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2007.131243

Lakes KD, Kettler RJ, Schmidt J, Fenney-Kettler K, Kamptner L, Swanson J, et al. The CUIDAR early intervention parent training program for preschoolers at risk for behavioral disorders: an innovative practice for reducing disparities in access to service. J Early Interv 2009; 31: 167-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1053815109331861 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815109331861

Maltese J, Aguayo J, Chavez J. A community-based response to Part C: A community embraces its most vulnerable children. Zero to Three 31(4): 17-23.

Iland ED, Weiner I, Murawski WW. Obstacles of Latina mothers of children with autism. Calif J Health Promot 2012; 10: 25-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32398/cjhp.v10iSI-Latino.1480

Barth RP, Scarborough A, Lloyd EC, Losby J, Casanueva C, Mann T. Developmental status and early intervention service needs of maltreated children [Internet]. U S Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation; 2007 [cited 2015 Nov 20]. Available from: http://aspe.hhs.gov/pdf-report/developmental-status-and-early-intervention-service-needs-maltreated-children

National Scientific Council on the Developing Child. The science of early childhood development: closing the gap between what we know and what we do. Harvard University; 2007 [cited 2015 Nov 20]. Available from: http://developingchild.harvard.edu/resources/the-science-of-early-childhood-development-closing-the-gap-between-what-we-know-and-what-we-do/

American Academy of Pediatrics. Policy statement: identifying infants and young children with developmental disorders in the medical home: an algorithm for developmental surveillance and screening. Pediatrics 2006; 118: 405-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2006-1231 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2006-1231

Marks KP, Glascoe FP, Macias MM. Enhancing the algorithm for developmental-behavioral surveillance and screening in children 0-5 years. Clin Pediatr 2011; 50: 853-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0009922811406263 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0009922811406263

Jones MK, Laver L. Evidentiary review of screening infants for autism. Intellect Disabl Diagn J 3: 120-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6000/2292-2598.2015.03.03.1

Schonwald A, Huntinton N, Chan E, Risko W, Bridgemohan C. Routine developmental screening implemented in urban primary care settings: more evidence of feasibility and effectiveness. Pediatrics 2009; 123: 660-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2007-2798 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2007-2798

Al-Qabandi M, Gorter JW, Rosenbaum P. Early autism detection: are we ready for routine screening? Pediatrics 2011; 128: e211-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010-1881 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010-1881

Tout K, Halle T, Daily S, Albertson-Junkans L, Moodie M. The research base for a birth through age eight state policy framework. Washington DC: Child Trends 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/e542292013-001

Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 2004.

Busillo-Aguayo J, Weiner I, Berrey V. Community based screenings: lessons learned. National Social Science Journal 2015; 45(1): 8-17.

U S Census Bureau. American Community Survey 5-year data [Internet]. 2009-2013 [cited 2015 Dec 8]. U S Department of Commerce. Available from: https://www. census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/data.html

Singh GK, Strickland BB, Ghandour RM, van Dyck PC. Geographic disparities in access to the medical home among US CSHCN. Pediatrics 2008; 124: S352-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2009-1255E

Glascoe FP. Collaborating with parents: using parents’ evaluation of developmental status (PEDS) to detect and address developmental and behavioral problems. Nolensville (TN): PEDStest 2013.

Brothers KB, Glascoe FP, Robershaw NS. PEDS: developmental milestones: an accurate brief tool for surveillance and screening. Clin Pediatr 2008; 47: 271-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0009922807309419 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0009922807309419

Johnson-Staub J. Charting progress for babies in child care: promote access to early, regular, and comprehensive screening [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2015 Nov 20].

Available from: http://www.clasp.org/babiesinchildcare/ recommendations