Early Intervention of Kindergarten Children at Risk for Developmental Disabilities: A Greek Paradigm
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6000/2292-2598.2015.03.04.10Keywords:
Kindergarten, early intervention, inclusive curricula, developmental disabilities, at risk children, response to intervention, dynamic assessmentAbstract
Internationally most of the children at risk for developmental disabilities (intellectual disabilities, learning disabilities and language impairments) are detected within preschool settings. In Greece there are no early intervention services mandated nationwide. In practice, not detailed guidance and support is given to preschool teachers regarding the assessment and intervention of children at risk. This study provides research evidence from the implementation of an early intervention program in inclusive kindergartens, which is part of the practical training of students from the Faculty of Preschool Education Sciences, Department of Psychology and Special Education, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece. Response to intervention, as applied to kindergartens, was used to detect children not responding to core kindergarten curriculum. An inclusive early intervention educational program was implemented based on children’s profiles of strengths and weaknesses. At risk children participated in large group classroom activities with all children. For these children a specialized inclusive program with emphasis on school readiness was implemented. For children with developmental disabilities, an intensive individualized program was implemented, which put emphasis on the improvement of their cognitive abilities and socialization.
References
De Moor JMH, Van Waesberghe BTM, Hosman JBL, et al. Early intervention for children with developmental disabilities: manifesto of the Eurlyaid working party. Int J Rehabil Res 1993; 16(1): 23-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004356-199303000-00003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00004356-199303000-00003
Early Childhood Learning and Knowledge Center, ECLKC [homepage on the internet] [cited 2015 Nov 10] Available from: https://eclkc.ohs.acf.hhs.gov/hslc
Wolery M, Doyle PM, Gast DL, et al. Comparison of progressive time delay and transition-based teaching with preschoolers who have developmental delay. J Early Interv 1993; 17(2): 160-176. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/105381519301700207 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/105381519301700207
McDonnell AP, Brownell KL, Wolery M. Teaching experience and specialist support: A survey of preschool teachers employed in programs accredited by NAEYC. Top Early Childh Sp Ed 1997; 17(3): 263-285. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/027112149701700303 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/027112149701700303
Buscemi L, Bennett T, Thomas D, et al. Head Start: Chall-enges and training needs. J Early Interv 1996; 20(1): 1-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/105381519602000101 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/105381519602000101
Barnett DW, Carey KT, Hall JD. Naturalistic Intervention Design for Young Children Foundations, Rationales, and Strategies. Top Ear Childh Sp Ed 1993; 13(4): 430-444. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/027112149301300407 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/027112149301300407
Olness KMD. Effects on brain development leading to cognitive impairment: a worldwide epidemic. J Dev Behav Pediatr 2003; 24(2): 85-137. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004703-200304000-00009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00004703-200304000-00009
Park J, Turnbull AP, Turnbull III HR. Impacts of poverty on quality of life in families of children with disabilities. Except Children 2002; 68(2): 151-170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290206800201
Burchinal MR, Robertsc JE, Hooper R, et al. Cumulative risk and early cognitive development: A comparison of statistical risk models. Dev Psychol 2000; 36(6): 793-807. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.36.6.793 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0012-1649.36.6.793
The Education of the Handicapped Act Amendments of 1986; P.L. 99-457.
Guralnick MJ. Inclusion as a core principle in the early intervention system. In: Guralnick MJ, Ed. The developmental systems approach to early intervention. Baltimore: Brookes 2005; pp. 59-69.
Guralnick MJ. An overview of the developmental systems model for early intervention. In: Guralnick MJ editor. The developmental systems approach to early intervention. Baltimore: Brookes 2005; pp. 3-28.
Guralnick MJ. Efficacy research in early childhood intervention programs. In: Odom SL, Karnes MB, Eds. Early intervention for infants and children with bandicaps: An empirical base. Baltimore: Brookes 1988; pp. 75-88.
Shonkoff JP, Hauser-Cram P. Early Intervention for Disabled Infants and Their Families: A Quantitative Analysis. J Am Acad Pediatr 1987; 80(5): 650-658. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.80.5.650
Bryant D, Maxwell K. The effectiveness of early intervention for disadvantaged children. In: Guralnick M, Ed. The effectiveness of early intervention. Baltimore: Brookes 1997; pp. 23-46.
Martin SL, Ramey CT, Ramey S. The prevention of intellectual impairment in children of impoverished families: findings of a randomized trial of educational day care. Am J Public Health 1990; 80(7): 844-847. http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.80.7.844 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.80.7.844
Guralnick MJ. Why early intervention works: A systems perspective. Infants and Young Children 2011; 24: 6-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IYC.0b013e3182002cfe DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/IYC.0b013e3182002cfe
Baumrind D. The average expectable environment is not good enough: a response to Scarr. Child Dev 1993; 64(5): 1299-1317. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1131536 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1993.tb02954.x
Dumas JE, LaFreniere PJ. Mother-child relationships as sources of support or stress: a comparison of competent, average, aggre-ssive, and anxious dyads. Child Dev 1993; 64(6): 1732-1754. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1131466 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1993.tb04210.x
Meisels SJ, Shonkoff JP. Early childhood intervention: A continuing evolution. In: Shonkoff J, Meisels SJ, Eds. Handbook of early childhood intervention. New York: Cambridge University Press 2000; pp. 3-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511529320.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511529320.003
IDEIA. Individuals with disabilities education improvement act. Pub. L. No. 108-446, 118 Stat. 2647. 2004
Cavallaro CC, Haney M, Cabello B. Developmentally appropriate strategies for promoting full participation in early childhood settings. Top Early Child Spec 1993; 13(3): 293-307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/027112149301300307 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/027112149301300307
Bailey DB, McWilllam RA, Buysse V, et al. Inclusion in the context of competing values in early childhood education. Early Child Res Q 1998; 13(1): 27-47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2006(99)80024-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2006(99)80024-6
Guralnick MJ. The Nature and meaning of social integration for young children with mild developmental delays in inclusive settings. J Early Interv 1999; 22(1): 70-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/105381519902200107 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/105381519902200107
Simeonsson RJ. Risk, resilience & prevention: promoting the well-being of all children. Baltimore: Paul H Brookes Pub Co; 1994.
Guralnick MJ. Early Intervention for children with Intellectual Disabilities: Current Knowledge and Future Prospects. J Appl Res Intellect 2005c; 18(4): 313-324. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3148.2005.00270.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3148.2005.00270.x
Sugai G. Responsiveness-to-intervention: lessons being learned. Keynote presentation at the U.S. Department of Education RTI Summit, Washington, D.C. 2007.
VanDerHeyden AM, Snyder P. Integrating frameworks from early childhood intervention and school psychology to accelerate growth for all young children. School Psychol Rev 2006; 35(4): 519-534. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2006.12087959
Wilks A, Nyland B, Chancellor B, et al. Analysis of curriculum/learning frameworks for the early years (birth to age 8). East Melbourne: Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority 2008.
Ackerman DJ, Sansanelli RA. The source of child care centre preschool learning and program standards: implications for potential early learning challenge fund grantees. Early Child Res Prac 2010; 12(1).
Gerber S, Scott L. Designing a learning curriculum and technology’s role in it. Educ Tech Res Dev 2007; 55(5): 461-478. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11423-006-9005-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-006-9005-6
Harrison LJ, Ungerer JA, Smith GJ, et al. Child care and early education in Australia: the longitudinal study of Australian children. Social policy research paper no. 40. Canberra: Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs 2009.
Pungello EP, Kainz K, Burchinal M, et al. Early educational intervention, early cumulative risk, and the early home environment as predictors of young adult outcomes within a high-risk sample. Child Dev 2010; 81(1): 410-426. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01403.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01403.x
Effects of Preschool Curriculum Programs on School Readiness. PreSchool Curriculum Evaluation Research Consortium. US Department of Education 2008.
Fox L, Dunlap G, Hemmeter M, et al. The teaching pyramid: a Mmodel for supporting social competence and preventing challenging behavior in young children. Young Children 2003; 58(4): 48-52.
HELIOS "Handicapped people in the European Community living independently in an open society". The Commission of European Communities. (1988/1991; followed by HELIOS II, 1992/95)
European Agency for Development in Special Needs Education. Early childhood intervention analysis of situations in Europe. Key aspects and recommendations. Brussels. 2005.
NESSE network of experts: education and disability/special needs. Policies and practices in education, training and employment for students with disabilities and special educational needs in the EU, Independent Report for the European Commission 2012.
Carpenter Β. Early childhood intervention: possibilities and prospects for professionals, families and children. British J Special Educ 2005; 32(4): 176-183. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8578.2005.00394.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8578.2005.00394.x
Law 1143/1981. Greek Government. 80 -A- 31.3.1981 (in Greek).
Law 2817/2000. Greek Govermenent. 78 -A- 14.3.2000 (in Greek).
Law 3699/2008. Greek Government. 199 -A- 2.10.2008 (in Greek).
De Moor JMH, van Walsberghe BTM, Tzouriadou M, Kontopoulou M. Early intervention in children with developmental disabilities. A manifesto of the Eurlyaid working group. Educational Review 1996; 023:16. (in Greek).
Fyssa A, Vlachou A, Avramidis E. Early childhood teachers’ understandings of inclusive education and associated practices: reflections from Greece. International Journal of Early Years Education 2014; 22(2): 223-237. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2014.909309 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2014.909309
Zoniou-Sideri A, Vlachou A. Greek teachers’ belief systems about disability and inclusive education. International Journal of Inclusive Education 2006; 10(4-5): 379-394. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13603110500430690 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13603110500430690
Fyssa A, Vlachou A. Assessment of quality for inclusive programs in Greek preschool classrooms. Journal of Early Intervention 2015; 37(3): 190-207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1053815115606908 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815115606908
Nanou A. A psychoeducational strategy training program for the improvement of story telling in preschool children with developmental language disorders. PhD Thesis. Aristotle University of Thessaloniki 2004 (in Greek).
Anagnostopoulou E. Cognitive and language disabilities of preschool children at risk to develop school difficulties: a psycho-pedagogical program of early intervention with the use of analytic methods. PhD Thesis. Aristotle University of Thessaloniki 2004 (in Greek).
Manavopoulos K. A pilot study of an early intervention educational program in Greece. Paper presented in the European Association for Mental Health in Mental Retardation (EAMHM) Congress ‘Mental health and mental retardation: a lifespan multidisciplinary approach’, Rome, Italy, September 17-20, 2003.
Lidz CS. Practitioners 's guide to dynamic assessment. New York: The Guilford Press 1991.
Miller L, Gillam R, Pena E. Dynamic assessment and intervention: Improving children's narrative abilities. Austin: PRO-ED 2001.
Feuerstein R. The dynamic assessment of retarded performers: The learning potential assessment device, theory, instruments, and techniques. Baltimore: University Park Press 1979.
Tzuriel D. Dynamic assessment of young children: educational and intervention perspectives. Educ Psychol Rev 2000; 12(4): 385-435. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1009032414088 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009032414088
Feuerstein R, Falik LH. Learning to think, thinking to learn: a comparative analysis of three approaches to instruction. J Cognitive Educ Psychol 2010; 8(1): 4-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1891/1945-8959.9.1.4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1891/1945-8959.9.1.4
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
