Re-Conceptualizing Developmental Areas of Assessment for Screening, Eligibility Determination and Program Planning in Early Intervention
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6000/2292-2598.2015.03.04.8Keywords:
Assessment, early intervention, approaches-to-learning, executive function, eligibility, program planning.Abstract
Contemporary recommended practices in early childhood assessment strive to gain a holistic picture of child learning and development to inform screening, eligibility, and program planning decisions. These practices have traditionally focused on competencies reflected in developmental domains with limited attention to the approaches-to-learning used to acquire those competencies. In this article, we call for the examination of early childhood constructs that impact a child’s ability to learn and develop, such as executive function (EF), mastery motivation, self-regulation and self-determination, specifically in the infant-toddler period. With EF defined as a wide range of central control processes in the brain that link and categorize information that is discernible in cognitive, motor, and behavioral responses [1], we propose a model of EF as the core construct that drives and unites these learning processes and describe how the model can be applied to Part C early intervention screening, assessment, eligibility determination, and program planning, as well as identify future directions in research and personnel preparation.
References
Diamond A. The early development of executive functions. In: Bialystock E, Craik FIM, Eds. The early development of executive functions. Lifespan cognition: Mechanisms of change. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press 2006; pp. 70-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195169539.003.0006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195169539.003.0006
Shonkoff JP, Fisher PA. Rethinking evidence-based practice and two-generation programs to create the future of early childhood policy. Dev Psychopathol 2013; 25(4pt2): 1635-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579413000813 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579413000813
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. c2004 [cited 2015 Dec 13]. Available from: http://idea.ed.gov/
Macy M, Bagnato S. The authentic alternative for assessment in early childhood intervention. In: Saklofske D, Reynolds C, Schwean V, editors. The Oxford handbook of child psychological assessment. New York: Oxford University Press 2013; pp. 671-82.
Macy M, Bagnato SJ, Macy RS, Salaway J. Conventional tests and testing for early intervention eligibility: Is there an evidence-base? Infants Young Child 2015: 28(2): 182-204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IYC.0000000000000032 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/IYC.0000000000000032
Guralnick MJ. Why early intervention works: A systems perspective. Infants Young Child 2011; 24: 6-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IYC.0b013e3182002cfe DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/IYC.0b013e3182002cfe
Collette F, Van der Linden M, Laureys S, et al. Exploring the unity and diversity of the neural substrates of executive functioning. Hum Brain Mapp 2005; 25(4): 409-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20118 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20118
Aarnoudse-Moens CS, Smidts DP, Oosterlaan J, Duivenvoorden HJ, Weisglas-Kuperus N. Executive function in very preterm children at early school age. J Abnorm Child Psychol 2009; 37: 981-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10802-009-9327-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-009-9327-z
Best JR, Miller PH. A developmental perspective on executive function. Child Development 2010; 81(6): 1641-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01499.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01499.x
McCabe DP, Roediger III HL, McDaniel MA, Balota DA, Hambrick DZ. The relationship between working memory capacity and executive functioning: evidence for a common executive attention construct. Neuropsychology 2010; 24(2): 222. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0017619 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017619
Raver CC, Blair C, Willoughby M. Poverty as a predictor of 4-year-olds' executive function: New perspectives on models of differential susceptibility. Developmental Psychology 2013; 49(2): 292. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0028343 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028343
Assel MA, Landry SH, Swank P, Smith KE, Steelman LM. Precursors to mathematical skills: Examining the roles of visual-spatial skills, executive processes, and parenting factors. Appl Dev Sci 2003; 7(1): 27-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S1532480XADS0701_3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532480XADS0701_3
Fletcher JM, Brookshire BL, Bohan TP, Beaver SR, Francis DJ. Cerebral white matter and cognition in hydrocephalic children. Arch Neurol 1992; 49: 818-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archneur.1992.00530320042010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.1992.00530320042010
Lyon R. The need for conceptual and theoretical clarity in the study of attention, memory, and executive function. In: Lyon, GR, Krasnegor, N, editors. Attention, memory, and executive function. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes 1996; pp. 3-9.
Denckla MB. A theory and model of executive function: A neuropsychological perspective. In: Lyon GR, Krasnegor N, Eds. Attention, memory, and executive function. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes 1996; pp. 263-278.
Gioia GA, Espy KA, Isquith PK. Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function, Preschool Version (BRIEF-P). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources 2002.
Elton A, Gao W. Divergent task-dependent functional connectivity of executive control and salience networks. Cortex 2014; 51: 56-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2013.10.012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2013.10.012
National Research Council. From neurons to neighborhoods: The science of early childhood development. Washington, DC: National Academy Press 2000.
Lawson KR, Ruff HA. Early attention and negative emotionality predict later cognitive and behavioral function. Int J Behav Dev 2004; 28: 157-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01650250344000361 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01650250344000361
Diamond A, Barnett WS, Thomas J, Munro S. Preschool program improves cognitive control. Science (New York, NY). 2007; 318(5855): 1387. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1151148 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1151148
Zelazo PD, Müller U, Frye D, Marcovitch S, Argitis G, Boseovski J, Chiang JK, Hongwanishkul D, Schuster BV, Sutherland A, Carlson SM. The development of executive function in early childhood. Monographs of the society for research in child development. 2003; i-151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0037-976X.2003.00261.x
Raver CC, Izard CE, Koop CB. Young children’s emotional development and school readiness. Social policy report. 2003; 16(3): 3-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2379-3988.2002.tb00041.x
Blasco PM. Social mastery motivation: Scaffolding opportunities for young children. In: Peterson C, Fox L, Blasco P, editors. Young exceptional children monograph series no. 10: early intervention for infants and toddlers and their families: Practices and outcomes. Missoula, MT: Division for Early Childhood 2008; pp. 93-104.
Butterfield P, Martin C, Prairie A, Martin CA. Emotional connections: How relationships guide early learning. Washington, DC: Zero to Three 2004.
Chevalier N. The development of executive function: Toward more optimal coordination of control with age. Child Dev Perspect 2015; 9(4): 239-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12138 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12138
Avirett E, Maricle D. Executive function. In: Goldstein S, Naglieri J, editors. Encyclopedia of children, behavior and development. New York: Springer 2011; 616-618. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-79061-9_1047
Wiebe SA, Espy K, Charak D. Using confirmatory factor analysis to understand executive control in preschool chil-dren: I. Latent structure. Dev Psychol 2008; 44(2): 575-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.44.2.575 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.44.2.575
Bell MA, Adams SE. Comparable performance on looking and reaching versions of the A-not-B task at 8 months of age. Infant Behav Dev 1999; 22(2): 221-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0163-6383(99)00010-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0163-6383(99)00010-7
Bayley N. Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (BSID) III. San Antonio: TX: Psychological Corp 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/t14978-000
Lowe J, Erickson SJ, MacLean P, Duvall SW. Early working memory and maternal communication in toddlers born very low birth weight. Acta Paediatr 2009; 98(4): 660-3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1651-2227.2008.01211.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1651-2227.2008.01211.x
Lowe J, MacLean PC, Shaffer ML, Watterberg K. Early working memory in children born with extremely low birth weight: Assessed by object permanence. J Child Neurol 2009; 24: 410-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0883073808324533 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0883073808324533
Isquith PK, Gioia GA, Espy KA. Executive function in preschool children: examination through everyday behavior. Dev Neuropsychol 2004: 26: 403-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15326942dn2601_3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326942dn2601_3
Morgan GA, Harmon RJ, Maslin-Cole CA. Mastery motivation: Definition and measurement. Early Educ Dev 1990; 1: 318-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15566935eed0105_1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15566935eed0105_1
Busch-Rossnagel N, Morgan G. Introduction to section three: Overview and analysis. In: Barrett KC, Fox N, Morgan G, Fidler D, Daunhauer L, Eds. Handbook of self-regulatory processes in development: New directions and international perspectives. New York: Taylor and Francis 2013; pp. 247-264. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203080719.ch12 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203080719.ch12
Morgan G, MacTurk R, Hrncir E. Mastery motivation: Overview, definitions, and conceptual issues. In: MacTurk RH, Morgan GA, Eds. Mastery motivation: Origins, conceptualizations, and applications. Norwood, NJ: Ablex 1995; pp. 1-18.
Barrett K, Morgan G, Maslin-Cole C. Three studies on the development of mastery motivation in infancy and toddlerhood. In: Messer D, Ed. Mastery motivation in early childhood: Development, measurement, and social processes. London: Routledge 1993; pp. 168-188.
Messer D, McCarthy M, McQuiston S, MacTurk R, Yarrow L, Vietze P. Relation between mastery behavior in infancy and competence in early childhood. Dev Psychol 1986; 22: 366-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.22.3.366 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.22.3.366
Gilmore L, Cuskelly M, Purdie N. Mastery motivation: Stability and predictive validity from ages two to eight. Early Educ Dev 2003; 14: 411-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15566935eed1404_2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15566935eed1404_2
Morgan G, Wang J, Barrett K, Liao H, Wang P, Huang S, Jozsa K. The Revised Dimensions of Mastery Questionnaire (DMQ 18). Fort Collins, CO: Colorado State University; 2015 Nov 19 [cited 2015 Dec 13]. Available from: https://docs. google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=sites&srcid=cmFtcy5jb2xvc3RhdGUuZWR1fGdlb3JnZW1vcmdhbnxneDo0NmVmODE1MmI4MmI5MmFl
Division for Early Childhood (US). Recommended practices in early intervention/early childhood special education [Internet]. Los Angeles, CA: Division for Early Childhood; 2014 [cited August 13, 2014]. Available from: http://dec. membershipsoftware.org/files/Recommended%20Practices/DEC%202014%20Recommended%20Practices.pdf
Morgan GA, Wang J, Liao HF, Xu Q. Using the Dimensions of Mastery Questionnaire to assess mastery motivation and self-regulation: A cross national perspective. In: Barrett KC, Fox N, Morgan G, Fidler D, Daunhauer L, Eds. Handbook of self-regulatory processes in development: New directions and international perspectives. New York: Taylor and Francis 2013; pp. 305-336.
Suen H, Logan CR, Neisworth J, Bagnato S. Parent-professional congruence: Is it necessary? J Early Interv 1995; 19: 243-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/105381519501900307 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/105381519501900307
Linder T. Transdisciplinary play-based assessment. 3rd ed. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes 2008.
Palmer S, Summers JA, Brotherson MJ, et al. Foundations for self-determination in early childhood: An inclusive model for children with disabilities. Topics Early Child Spec Educ 2013: 33(1): 38-47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0271121412445288 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121412445288
Ursache A, Blair C, Stifter C, Voegtline K. Emotional reactivity and regulation in infancy interact to predict executive functioning in early childhood. Dev Psychol 2013; 49: 127-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0027728 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027728
Blair C, Raver S. School readiness and self-regulation: A developmental psychobiological approach. Annu Rev Psychol 2015; 66: 711-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015221 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015221
Vallotton C, Ayoub C. Use your words: The role of language in the development of toddlers’ self-regulation. Early Child Res Q 2011; 26: 169-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2010.09.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2010.09.002
Voress J, Maddox T. Developmental Assessment for Young Children – 2. San Antonio, TX: Pearson 2012.
Dunn W. The Infant-Toddler Sensory Profile – 2. San Antonio, TX: Pearson 2014.
Bagnato S, Neisworth J, Salvia J, Hunt F. Temperament and Atypical Behavior Scale (TABS). Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/t11539-000
Blasco PM, Falco RA, Munson LJ. Project SELF: Preparing professionals to facilitate self-determination. J Early Interv 2006; 29(1): 63-79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/105381510602900105 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/105381510602900105
Erwin EJ, Brotherson MJ, Palmer SB, Cook CC, Weigel CJ, Summers JA. How to Promote Self-Determination for Young Children With Disabilities Evidenced-Based Strategies for Early Childhood Practitioners and Families. Young Exceptional Children 2009; 12(2): 27-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1096250608329611 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1096250608329611
Erwin EJ, Brown F. Variables that contribute to self-determination in early childhood. TASH iVewsletter. 2000; 26(3): 8-10.
Early Intervention Program for Infants and Toddlers with Disabilities Rule of 2011, 34 C.F.R. §303. c2011 [cited 2015 Dec 13]. Available from: http://idea.ed.gov/
Lucas A, Shaw E. (2012). Informed clinical opinion (NECTAC Notes no. 28). Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina, FPG Child Development Institute, National Early Childhood Technical Assistance Center; 2012 Aug [cited 2015 Aug 4]. Available from http://www.nectac.org/~pdfs/ pubs/nnotes28.pdf
Dannemiller JL. Do children's attention processes mediate the link between family predictors and school readiness? Society for Research in Child Development - SRCD 2003; 2003 April; Tampa, FL (US). (Joint Author: NICHD Early Child Care Research Network).
Hebbeler K, Spiker D, Bailey D, et al. Early intervention for infants and toddlers with disabilities and their families: Participants, services, and outcomes. Final Report of the National Early Intervention Longitudinal Study (NEILS) [Internet]. Menlo Park, CA: SRI; 2007 January [cited 2015 May 27]. Available from https://www.sri.com/sites/default/ files/publications/neils_finalreport_200702.pdf
U.S. Department of Education. Part C early intervention numbers and percentages 2013 [Internet data file]; 2014 [cited 2015 Dec 13]. Available from https://osep.grads360. org/#communities/pdc/documents/7082
Bagnato SJ, McKeating-Esterle E, Fevola A, Bortolamasi P, Neisworth JT. Valid use of clinical judgment (informed opinion) for early intervention eligibility: Evidence base and practice characteristics. Infants Young Child 2008; 21(4): 334-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.IYC.0000336545.90744.b0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.IYC.0000336545.90744.b0
Hebbeler K, Barton L. The need for data on child and family outcomes at the federal and state levels. In: Horn E, Peterson C, Fox L, editors. Young exceptional children monograph series no. 9: Linking curriculum to child and family outcomes. Missoula, MT: Division for Early Childhood 2007; pp. 1-15.
Busch-Rossnagel N. First do no harm: Culturally centered measurement for early intervention. In: Trimble J, Fisher C, editors. The handbook of ethical research with ethnocultural populations & communities. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. 2006; pp. 51-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412986168.n3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412986168.n3
McAfee O, Leong DJ. Assessing and guiding young learners’ development and learning. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon 2002.
Bagnato S, McLean M, Macy M, Neisworth J. Identifying instructional targets for early childhood via authentic assessment: Alignment of professional standards and practice-based evidence. J Early Interv 2011; 33(4): 243-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1053815111427565 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815111427565
Promoting positive outcomes for children with disabilities: Recommendations for curriculum, assessment, and program evaluation [Internet]. Missoula, MT: Division for Early Childhood; 2007 [2007] Available from http://dec. membershipsoftware.org/files/Position%20Statement%20and%20Papers/Prmtg_Pos_Outcomes_Companion_Paper.pdf
Willoughby MT, Pek J, Blair CB. Measuring executive function in early childhood: A focus on maximal reliability and the derivation of short forms. Psychological assessment. 2013; 25(2): 664. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0031747 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031747
Keilty B, LaRocco D, Casell F. Early interventionists’ reports of authentic assessment methods through focus group research. Topics Early Child Spec Educ 2009; 28(4): 244-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0271121408327477 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121408327477
Enhancing and practicing executive function skills with children from infancy to adolescence [Internet]. Center on the Developing Child [cited 2015 Jul 31]. Available from http://developingchild.harvard.edu/resources/enhancing-and-practicing-executive-function-skills-with-children-from-infancy-to-adolescence/
Diamond A, Lee K. Interventions shown to aid executive function development in children 4 to 12 years old. Science 2011; 333(6045): 959-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1204529 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1204529
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
