Instructional Methods that Foster the Reading Development of Students with Significant Intellectual Disabilities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6000/2292-2598.2015.03.01.3Keywords:
Intellectual disabilities, sight word instruction, reading instruction, speech and language impairment, physical impairments.Abstract
Educational legislation has made reading a priority for students with significant intellectual disabilities (ID) and associated speech, language, sensory, or physical impairments. Historically, reading instruction for students with significant ID has focused on sight word instruction, with limited exposure to other essential reading skills. This article focuses on the evidence-based instructional methods that effectively and efficiently foster the reading development of students with significant ID. The authors reviewed the literature from the past 20 years on reading interventions for students with significant ID. In spite of access and opportunity barriers that have inhibited the reading development of students with significant ID, a synthesis of the empirical research on reading instruction suggests that students with significant ID and associated disabilities can learn phonemic awareness, phonics, vocabulary, fluency, and comprehension skills with direct instruction. Implications for providing reading instruction that effectively promotes reading development are discussed and areas for future research are identified.
References
Karemaker A, Pitchford NJ, O’Malley C. Enhanced recognition of written words and enjoyment of reading in struggling beginner readers through whole-word multimedia software. J Compedu 2009; 54(1): 199-208. Computers & Education 2009; 1-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.07.018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.07.018
Browder DM, Wakemen SY, Spooner F, Ahlgrim-Delzell L, Algozzine B. Research on reading instruction for individuals with significant cognitive disabilities. Except Child 2006; 72: 392-408. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290607200401
Browder DM, Xin YP. A meta-analysis and review of sight word research and its implications for teaching functional reading to individuals with moderate and severe disabilities. J Spec Educ 1998; 32: 130-153. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002246699803200301 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002246699803200301
Conners FA. Reading instruction for students with moderate mental retardation: Review and analysis of research. Am J Ment Retard 1992; 96: 577-597.
Bradford S, Shippen ME, Alberto P, Houchins DE, Flores M. Using systematic instruction to teach decoding skills to middle school students with moderate intellectual disabilities. Educ Train Dev Disabil 2006; 41: 333-343.
Ehri LC. Learning to read words: theory, findings, and issues. Sci Stud Read 2005; 9: 167-188. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0902_4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0902_4
Browder DM, Lalli JS. Review of research on sight word instruction. Res Dev Disabil 1991; 12: 203-228. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0891-4222(91)90008-G DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0891-4222(91)90008-G
Katims DS. Literacy assessment of students with mental retardation: an exploratory investigation. Educ Train Dev Disabil 2001; 36: 363-372.
Browder D, Gibbs S, Ahlgrim-Delzell L, Courtade GR, Mraz M, Flowers C. Literacy for students with severe developmental disabilities: what should we teach and what should we hope to achieve? Remedial Spec Educ 2009; 30: 269-282. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0741932508315054 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932508315054
National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups (NIH Publication No. 00-4754). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 2000.
Fidler DJ, Most DE, Guiberson MM. Neuropsychological correlates of word identification in Down syndrome. Res Dev Disabil 2005; 487-501. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2004.11.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2004.11.007
Mervis CR. Language and literacy development of children with Williams syndrome. Top Lang Disord 2009; 29: 149-169. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TLD.0b013e3181a72044 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/TLD.0b013e3181a72044
National Institute for Literacy. The definition of reading. Washington, DC; 2007 [cited 2009 Jun 23]: Available from: http://www.nifl.gov/partnershiopforreading/explore/reading_defined.html
Pufpaff LA. Barriers to participation in kindergarten literacy instruction for a student with augmentative and alternative communication needs. Psychol Sch 2008; 45: 582-599. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pits.20311 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20311
Zascavage VT, Keefe CH. Students with severe speech and physical impairments: Opportunity barriers to literacy. Focus Autism Other Dev Disabl 2004; 19: 223-234. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10883576040190040401 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10883576040190040401
Kliewer C, Biklen D. “School’s not really a place for reading”: a research synthesis of the literate lives of students with sev-ere disabilities. J Assoc Pers Sev Handicaps 2001; 26: 1-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.2511/rpsd.26.1.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2511/rpsd.26.1.1
American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author 2000.
Durando J. A survey on literacy instruction for students with multiple disabilities. J Vis Impair Blind 2008; 102: 40-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X0810200105
Rao S. From isolation to combination: a multilevel, multicom-ponent approach to developing literacy skills of students with cognitive impairment. Read Improv 2009; 46: 63-77.
Bergeron R, Floyd RG. Broad cognitive abilities of children with mental retardation: an analysis of group and individual profiles. Am J Ment Retard 2006; 6: 417-432. http://dx.doi.org/10.1352/0895-8017(2006)111[417:BCAOCW]2.0.CO;2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1352/0895-8017(2006)111[417:BCAOCW]2.0.CO;2
Henry LA. How does the severity of a learning disability affect working memory performance? Memory 2001; 9: 233-247. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09658210042000085 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210042000085
Browder DM, Ahlgrim-Delzell L, Courtade G, Gibbs SL, Flowers C. Evaluation of the effectiveness of an early literacy program for students with significant developmental disabilities. Except Child 2008; 75: 33-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290807500102
Conners FA, Rosenquist CJ, Sligh AC, Atwell JA, Kiser T. Phonological reading skills acquisition by children with mental retardation. Res Dev Disabil 2006; 27: 121-137. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2004.11.015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2004.11.015
Browder D, Gibbs S, Ahlgrim-Delzell L, Courtade G, Lee A. (2007). Early literacy skills builder. Verona, WI: Attainment; 2007.
Browder D, Trela K, Jimenez B. Training teachers to follow a task analysis to engage middle school students with moderate and severe developmental disabilities in grade-appropriate literature. Focus Autism Other Dev Disabl 2007; 22: 206-219. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10883576070220040301 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10883576070220040301
Erickson KA, Hanser G. Literacy through unity: Word study. Wooster, OH: Prentke Romich 2007.
Coleman-Martin MB, Heller KW, Cihak DF, Irvine KL. Using computer-assisted instruction and the Nonverbal Reading Approach to teach word identification. Focus Autism Other Dev Disabl 2005; 20: 80-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10883576050200020401 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10883576050200020401
Hanser GA, Erickson KA. Integrated word identification and communication instruction for students with complex communication needs: preliminary results. Focus Autism Other Dev Disabl 2007; 22: 268-278. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10883576070220040901 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10883576070220040901
Heller KW, Fredrick LD, Tumlin J, Brineman DG. Teaching decoding for generalization using the Nonverbal Reading Approach. J Dev Phys Disabil 2002; 14: 19-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1013559612238 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013559612238
Koppenhaver DA, Hendrix MP, Williams AR. Toward evidence-based literacy interventions for children with severe and multiple disabilities. Semin Speech Lang 2007; 28: 79-89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-967932 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-967932
Alfassi M, Weiss I, Lifshitz H. The efficacy of reciprocal teaching in fostering the reading literacy of students with intellectual disabilities. Eur J Spec Needs Educ 2009; 24: 291-305. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08856250903016854 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08856250903016854
Browder D, Mims PJ, Spooner, F, Ahlgrim-Delzell L, Lee A. Teaching elementary students with multiple disabilities to participate in shared stories. Res Pract Persons Severe Disabl 2008; 33: 3-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.2511/rpsd.33.1-2.3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2511/rpsd.33.1-2.3
Mims PJ, Browder DM, Baker JN, Lee A, Spooner F. Increasing comprehension of students with significant intellectual disabilities and visual impairments during shared stories. Educ Train Dev Disabil 2009; 44: 409-420.
Allor JH, Mathes PG, Champlin T, Cheatham JP. Research-based techniques for teaching early reading skills to students with intellectual disabilities. Educ Train Dev Disabil 2009; 44: 356-366.
Griffen AK, Schuster JW, Morse TE. The acquisition of instructive feedback: A comparison of continuous versus intermittent presentation schedules. Educ Train Ment Retard Dev Disabil 1998; 33: 42-61.
Erickson KA, Hatch P, Clendon S. Literacy, assistive technology, and students with significant disabilities. Focus Except Child 2010; 42: 1-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17161/foec.v42i5.6904
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
