Control Charts for Skewed Distributions: Johnson’s Distributions

Authors

  • Bachioua Lahcene Department of Mathematics, Preparatory Year College, University of Hail, P.O. Box. 2440, Hail 41581, Saudi Arabia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-6029.2015.04.02.8

Keywords:

Statistical Process Control, Shewhart control charts, non-normal data, Johnson System of distributions.

Abstract

In this study, some important issues regarding process capability and performance have been highlighted, particularly in case when the distribution of a process characteristic is non-normal. The process capability and performance analysis has become an inevitable step in quality management of modern industrial processes. Determination of the performance capability of a stable process using the standard process capability indices (Cp, Cpk) requires that the quality characteristics of the underlying process data should follow a normal distribution. Statistical Process Control charts widely used in industry and services by quality professionals require that the quality characteristic being monitored is normally distributed. If, in contrast, the distribution of this characteristic is not normal, any conclusion drawn from control charts on the stability of the process may be misleading and erroneous. In this paper, an alternative approach has been suggested that is based on the identification of the best distribution that would fit the data. Specifically, the Johnson distribution was used as a model to normalize real field data that showed departure from normality. Real field data from the construction industry was used as a case study to illustrate the proposed analysis.

Author Biography

Bachioua Lahcene, Department of Mathematics, Preparatory Year College, University of Hail, P.O. Box. 2440, Hail 41581, Saudi Arabia

Mathematics

References

Farnum NR. Using Johnson Curves to Describe Non-Normal Process Data. Quality Eng 1996; 9(2): 329-336. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08982119608919049 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08982119608919049

Chou Y, Polansky AM, Mason RL. Transforming Non-normal Data to Normality in Statistical Process Control. J Quality Technol 1998; 30: 133-141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00224065.1998.11979832

Sherill RW, Johnson LA. Calculated Decisions. Quality Progr 2009; 42(1): 30-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.revmed.2008.05.004

Derya K, Canan H. Control Charts for Skewed Distributions: Weibull, Gamma and Lognormal. Metodoloski zvezki 2012; 9(2): 95-106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51936/ghaa8860

Johnson NL. Systems of frequency curves generated by methods of translation. Biometrika 1949; 36: 149-176. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biomet/36.1-2.149 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/36.1-2.149

Hahn J. Gerald and Shapiro S. Samuel, Statistical models in Engineering, John Wiley and Sons 1967.

Johnson NL, Kotz S, Balakrishnan N. Continuous Univariate Distributions, Second Edition, New York: John Wiley & Sons 1994.

Kilink K, Celik A, Tuncan M, Tuncan A, Arslan G, Arioz O. Statistical distributions of in situ microcore concrete strength. Construct Build Mater 2012; 26(1): 393-403. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.06.038 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.06.038

Lovelace CR, Swain JJ. Process capability analysis methodology for zero bound, non-normalprocess data. Quality Eng 2009; 21: 190-202. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08982110802643173 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08982110802643173

ACI Committee 214, Evaluation of Strength Test Results of Concrete (ACI 214R-02) 2005.

Downloads

Published

2015-05-21

How to Cite

Lahcene, B. (2015). Control Charts for Skewed Distributions: Johnson’s Distributions. International Journal of Statistics in Medical Research, 4(2), 217–223. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-6029.2015.04.02.8

Issue

Section

General Articles