Snapshot of Statistical Methods Used in Geriatric Cohort Studies: How Do We Treat Missing Data in Publications?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-6029.2013.02.04.5Keywords:
Missing data, geriatric cohort studies, methodologies review, longitudinal analysisAbstract
Background: Geriatric studies often miss data of frail participants. The aim of this paper is to explore which missing data methodologies have entered current practice and to discuss the potential impact of ignoring the issue.
Methods: A Sample of 103 articles was drawn from key cohort studies: Health ABC, InCHIANTI, LASA, BLSA, EPESE, and KLoSHA. The studies were classified according to missing data methodologies used.
Results: Seventy-seven percent described the selected analysis data set and only 28% used a method of handling all available observations per case. Missing data dedicated methods were rare (< 10%), applying single or multiple imputations for baseline variables. Studies with longer follow-up periods more often employed longitudinal analysis methodologies.
Conclusions: Despite the recognition that missing data is a major problem in studies of older persons, few published studies account for missing data using limited methodologies; this could affect the validity of study conclusions. We propose researchers apply Joint Modeling of longitudinal and time-to-event data, using shared-parameter model.
References
Panel on Handling Missing Data in Clinical Trials. The prevention and treatment of missing data in clinical trials. National Academy Press 2010.
Ahrens W, Pigeot I. Handbook of epidemiology. Springer 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-26577-1
Ferraro KF, Kelley-Moore JA. A half century of longitudinal methods in social gerontology: Evidence of change in the journal. J Gerontol Series B: Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2003; 58(5): S264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/58.5.S264
Yaffe K, Weston A, Graff-Radford NR, Satterfield S, Simonsick EM, Younkin SG, et al. Association of plasma β-amyloid level and cognitive reserve with subsequent cognitive decline. JAMA 2011; 305(3): 261. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2010.1995 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2010.1995
Allison PD. Missing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications 2001.
Little R, Rubin D. Statistical analysis with missing data. 2nd edn. Wiley & Sons 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119013563
Rubin DB. Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. Wiley & Sons 1987. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470316696 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470316696
Zeger SL, Liang KY, Albert PS. Models for longitudinal data: A generalized estimating equation approach. Biometrics 1988; 44(4): 1049-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2531734 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2531734
Hogan JW, Roy J, Korkontzelou C. Handling drop‐out in longitudinal studies. Stat Med 2004; 23(9): 1455-97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sim.1728 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1728
Rotnitzky A, Robins JM, Scharfstein DO. Semiparametric regression for repeated outcomes with nonignorable nonresponse. J Am Statist Assoc 1998; 93(444): 1321-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1998.10473795 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1998.10473795
Tsiatis A. Semiparametric theory and missing data. Springer 2006.
Tsiatis AA, Davidian M. Joint modeling of longitudinal and time-to-event data: An overview. Statistica Sinica 2004; 14(3): 809-34.
Rizopoulos D. Joint models for longitudinal and time-to-event data: With applications in R. CRC Press 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/b12208 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/b12208
Rizopoulos D. JM: An R package for the joint modelling of longitudinal and time-to-event data. J Statist Soft 2010; 35(9): 1-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v035.i09
Verbeke G, Molenberghs G. Linear mixed models for longitudinal data. Springer 2009.
Diggle P, Heagerty P, Liang K, Zeger S. Analysis of longitudinal data. Oxford University Press 2013.
Rizopoulos D. Dynamic predictions and prospective accuracy in joint models for longitudinal and Time‐to‐Event data. Biometrics 2011; 67(3): 819-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0420.2010.01546.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0420.2010.01546.x
Proust-Lima C, Taylor JM. Development and validation of a dynamic prognostic tool for prostate cancer recurrence using repeated measures of posttreatment PSA: A joint modeling approach. Biostatistics 2009; 10(3): 535-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxp009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxp009
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2013 Diklah Geva, Danit Shahar, Tamara Harris, Sigal Tepper, Michael Friger
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Policy for Journals/Articles with Open Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work
Policy for Journals / Manuscript with Paid Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Publisher retain copyright .
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work .
