Conceptual Framework for Assessing Sustainability of Swamp Buffalo Production Systems
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6000/1927-520X.2023.12.06Keywords:
Economic, ecological, and societal (EES), Sustainability analysis, Sustainability indicator, SWOT analysisAbstract
Swamp Buffalo farming plays an important role in farmers' livelihood and in satisfying red meat demand in South Kalimantan, Indonesia. The extensive (wetland) swamp buffalo production system (SPS) and the extensive and semi-intensive dryland system (DPS) are two production systems. The production systems have high complexity and require the integrated sustainability assessment approach to measure the contribution level of sustainability indicators. This study aimed to demonstrate the conceptual framework for analyzing the sustainability of buffalo production systems in South Kalimantan. The buffalo production systems in South Kalimantan were analyzed using the comprehensive assessment framework from September-December 2021. A literature review and discussion with experts, followed by a focus group discussion to perform a Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT) analysis was conducted. The complex problem identifies and defines the relevant Economic, Ecological, and Societal (EES) issues, and inclusive identification and analysis of relevant stakeholders were described. Issues identified during the process were translated into relevant indicators in the EES sustainability dimensions then indicators possible for EES issues were proposed. Situation analysis in this study described and identified swamp buffalo in South Kalimantan, which is currently experiencing a population decline. The gross margin and growth and reproduction performances of the buffaloes were selected for economic benefit in both systems. Total land use and soil fertility were the possible indicators in the dimension of environment relevant for DPS, while swamp sedimentation and water pollution were considered important environmental indicators in SPS. Feed availability was measured in both systems. Social dimension indicators in both systems were focused on keeping management, the function of buffalo for livelihood, time allocation to keep buffalo, characteristics of livelihood, and possible land use conflicts.
References
Deb GK, Nahar TN, Duran PG, Presicce GA. Safe and sustainable traditional production: the water buffalo in Asia. Frontiers in Environmental Science 2016; 4(38): 1-7.
https://10.3389/fenvs.2016.00038
Sumantri I, Chang HS. Impact of imported Indian buffalo meat on red meat supply and demand in South Kalimantan, Indonesia. IOP Conf Series: Earth and Environmental Science 2021; 902: 012033. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/902/1/012033
Widi TSM, Prastowo S, Sulaiman A, Hulfa R, Sumantri I. Reproductive characteristics of female swamp buffalo reared under kalang production system in South Kalimantan. IOP Conf Series: Earth and Environmental Science 2021; 902: 012041.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/902/1/012041
Rochgiyanti, Susanto H. Transformation of wetland local wisdom values on activities of swamp buffalo breeding in social science learning practice. Advances in Social Science, Education, and Humanities Research 2017; 147: 272-276.
https://doi.org/10.2991/icsse-17.2018.62
Sulaiman A, Rusmayadi G, Septiana M, Riyadi M. Kajian daya dukung wilayah terhadap produksi ternak kerbau rawa di Kecamatan Daha Barat, Hulu Sungai Selatan. In Prosiding Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Lahan Sub Optimal untuk Produksi Biomassa Berkelanjutan. Report, Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Lambung Mangkurat 2013.
Ten Napel J, van der Veen AA, Oosting SJ, Koerkamp PWGG. A conceptual approach to design livestock production n systems for robustness to enhance sustainability. Livestock Science 2011; 139: 150-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2011.03.007
Schiere JB, van der Hoek R. Livestock keeping in urban areas. A review of traditional technologies based on literature and field experience. FAO animal production and health 2014; paper No. 151.
Labecg T, Baret PV, Stilmant D. Sustainability indicator for livestock farming. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 2013; 33: 311-327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-012-0121-x
Martin G, Barth K, Benoit M, Brock C, Destruel M, Dumont B, Grillot M, Hubner S, Magne M, Moerman M, Mosnier C, Persons D, Ronchi B, Schanz L, Steinmetz L, Werne S, Winckler C, Primi R. Potential of multi-species livestock farming to improve the sustainability of livestock farms: A review. Agricultural System 2020; 181: 102821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102821
Meul M, van Passel S, Nevens F, Dessein J, Rogge E, Mulier A, van Hauwermeiren A. MOTIFS: A monitoring tool for integrated farm sustainability. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 2008; 28(2): 321-332. https://doi.org/10.1051/agro:2008001
Mollenhorst H. How to House a Hen. Assessing Sustainable Development of Egg Production System. Ph.D. Thesis, Wageningen University, The Netherlands, 2005; p. 136. Available at: https://library.wur.nl/WebQuery/wurpubs/fulltext/27952
Widi TSM, Udo H, Oldenbroek K, Budisatria IGS, Baliarti E, van der Zijpp A. Designing genetic impact assessment for crossbreeding with the exotic beef breed in the mixed farming system. Outlook on Agriculture 2020; 50(1): 34-45. https://doi.org/10.1177/0030727020915206
Mollenhorst H, de Boer HMJ. Identifying sustainability issues using participatory SWOT analysis: a case study of egg production in the Netherlands. Outlook on Agriculture 2004; 33(4): 267-276. https://doi.org/10.5367/0000000042664747
Nathan HSK, Reddy BS. Criteria selection framework for sustainable development indicators. International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making 2011; 1(3): 257-279. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMCDM.2011.041189
Sumantri I, Widi TSM, Widyas N, Habibah, Albana H. Morphometrics and carcass production of Kalimantan swamp buffalo under extensive production system (kalang). Livestock Research for Rural Development 2022; 34(3). http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd34/3/3415isuma.html.
BPS-Statistics Indonesia. The Buffalo Population in Indonesia by Provinces 2010-2020. The BPS-Statistics Indonesia. Jakarta 2021. https://www.bps.go.id/indicator/24/471/2/buffalo-population-by-province.html
Agusliani E, Darmadji D. Keanekaragaman hayati di rawa Danau Panggang Kabupaten Hulu Sungai Utara. Enviro Scienteae 2017; 13(3): 187-194. https://doi.org/10.20527/es.v13i3.4305
Arifin YR, Itta D. The potency of ulin (Eusideroxylon zwagery T. et. B) for supporting Banjarese building construction in wetland architecture. Journal of Wetlands Environmental Management 2013; 1(1): 61-64. https://doi.org/10.20527/jwem.01.01.03
Yusnizar Y, Ilham M, Rizal M, Sumantri C. Kerbau, Ternak Potensial yang Terlupakan. Bogor: Edu Pustaka 2015; pp. 19-20.
Nziguheba G, Adewopo J, Masso C, Nabahungu NL, Six J, Seguya H, Taulya G, Vanlauwe B. Assessment of sustainable land use: linking land management practices to sustainable land use indicators. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 2022; 20(3): 265-288. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2021.1926150
Guerrero-Lagerta I, Napolitano F, Cruz-Monteroza R, Mota-Rojas D, Mora-Medina P, Ramirez-Bribiesca E, Bertoni A, Berdugo-Guiterrez, Braghieri A. River buffalo meat production and quality: sustainability, productivity, nutritional and sensory properties. Journal of Buffalo Science 2020; 9: 159-169. https://doi.org/10.6000/1927-520X.2020.09.17
BPS Kalimantan Selatan. South Kalimantan in Figure 2022. Badan Pusar Statistik Provinsi Kalimantan Selatan. Banjarmasin 2022. https://kalsel.bps.go.id/publication/2022/02/25/2d212455a03806fc8befa9f5/provinsi-kalimantan-selatan-dalam-angka-2022.html
Grinnell NA, van der Linden A, Azhar B, Nobilly F, Slingerland M. Cattle-oil palm integration – a viable strategy to increase Malaysian beef self-sufficiency and palm oil sustainability. Livestock Science 2022; 259: 104902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2022.104902
Dee Whittier W, Gerken HJ, Zipper CE. Management of cow-calf production on reclaimed surfaced-mined land. Virginia Cooperative Extention 2010; 460-128. Available at: https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/bitstream/handle/10919/50731/460-128.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Abo-Farw MA, Nagy WM, Abdel-Khalek AE. Effect of post-mating treatment with controlled internal drug release (cidr) on pregnancy rate of repeat breeder Egyptian buffaloes. Journal of Animal Health and Production 2021; 9(4): 504-511. https://doi.org/10.17582/journal.jahp/2021/9.4.504.511
Azawi OI, Ali AJ, Noaman UT. A study on the ovarian follicular dynamic in Iraqi Northern Buffalo. Tropical Animal Health and Production 2009; 41: 79-83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-008-9156-z
Singh J, Nanda AS, Adams GP. The reproductive pattern and efficiency of female buffaloes. Animal Reproduction Science 2000; 60-61: 593-604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-019-01811-7
Safari A, Shadparvar AA, Hossein-Zadeh NG, Abdollahi-Arphanahi R. Economic values and selection indices for production and reproduction traits of Iranian buffaloes. Tropical Animal Health and Production 2019; 51(5): 1209-1214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-019-01811-7
Budiarto A, Hakim L, Ciptadi G, Nasich M, Putri ARI, Karima NK, Prasetyo YDA. The productivity estimation of female swamp buffalo population with different ages group in district Lumajang, East Java. IOP Conf Series: Earth and Environmental Science 2021; 743: 012053. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/743/1/012053
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Policy for Journals/Articles with Open Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work