Characterization of Buffalo Dairy Production Systems in Egypt Using Cluster Analysis Procedure

S.A.M. Abdel-Salam

doi:10.6000/1927-520X.2019.08.01.3

Authors

S.A.M. Abdel-Salam Department of Animal Production, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1927-520X.2019.08.01.3

Keywords:

Buffalo, production systems, typology, characterization.

Abstract

The study objective was to characterize and classify buffalo dairy production systems in Egypt. Ten governorates having high buffalo population density were selected as the study area. The data were collected from 1811 dairy buffalo farms using survey. Buffalo holders were face to face interviewed by constructed questionnaire. The survey was applied in two years (2010 and 2011). Two-Step Cluster procedure (CA) was used and analysis was repeated several times until the cluster quality came good (average silhouette ≥0.5). The algorithm selected the number of clusters, after calculating the Akaike’s information criterion (AIC). Statistics of CA showed that the numbers of farm in each cluster were 43 (2.4%) in cluster1 (CL1), 1364 (75.3%) in cluster2 (CL2) and 404 (22.3%) in cluster3 (CL3). CL1 farms had a good availability of facilities. The management practices were the higher in comparison with the farms in the other clusters. Management and feeding systems practices in CL1 ranged from medium to high. CL2 was the largest, with 1364 farms located in all the ten governorates. The availability of facilities and equipment were low or lacking. The management practices were the lowest in comparison with farms in other clusters. CL3 facilities availability were low to medium. The management practices were medium when compared with the farms in the other clusters. The results of the current study demonstrate the existence of a large variability among buffalo dairy production systems in Egypt. These systems variability should be taken into consideration for sustainable system development.

References

Cruz LC. Recent developments in the buffalo industry of Asia. Philippine Carabao Center, Muñoz, Nueva Ecija, Philippines. 2010 pcc-oed@mozcom.com, pcc_oed@yahoo.com. Buenos Aires, April, 2010.

FAO. Gateway to dairy production and products. 2019 http://www.fao.org/dairy-production-products/en/ April, 2019.

Tabana A. Development of a decision support system for individual dairy farms in mixed irrigated farming systems in the Nile Delta. PhD thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands 2000; ISBN 90-5808-245-8.

Gelasakis AI, Rosea G, Giannakoua R, et al. Typology and characteristics of dairy goat production systems in Greece. Livest Sci 2017; 197: 22-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2017.01.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2017.01.003

Mądry W, Mena Y, Roszkowska-Mądra B, Gozdowski D, Hryniewski R, Castel JM. An overview of farming system typology methodologies and its use in the study of pasture-based farming system: a review. Span J Agric Res 2013; 11: 316-26. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2013112-3295 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2013112-3295

Ruiz FA, Castel JM, Mena Y, Camúñez J, González-Redondo P. Application of technico-economic analysis for characterizing, making diagnoses and improving pastoral dairy goat systems in Andalusia (Spain). Small Rum Res 2008; 77: 208-20.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2008.03.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2008.03.007

Ruiz FA, Mena Y, Castel JM. et al. Dairy goat grazing systems in Mediterranean regions: a comparative analysis in Spain, France and Italy. Small Rum Res 2009; 85: 42-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2009.07.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2009.07.003

FAO. FAOSTAT | © FAO Statistics Division. 2016. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#home. April, 2019.

IBM SPSS. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp. 2018.

Norušis MJ. Chapter 16 - Cluster Analysis. In Spss 17.0 Statistical procedures companion. (SPSS 16.0 Guide to Data Analysis). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall 2008. www.norusis.com/pdf/SPC_v13.pdf

Schiopu D. Applying two-step cluster analysis for identifying bank customers’ profile. Universită Ńii Petrol – Gaze din Ploiesti 2010; Vol. LXII No. 3:66 – 75. Seria, StiinŃe Economice.

López JR, Elías A, Delgado D. The feeding system of buffalo calves: Its influence on the species efficiency. Cuban J Agri Sci 2008; 42: 235-40.

Boulton AC, Rushton J, Claire Wathes D. A study of dairy heifer rearing practices from birth to weaning and their associated costs on UK dairy farms. Open J Anim Sci 2015a; 5: 185-97.https://doi.org/10.4236/ojas.2015.52021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ojas.2015.52021

Boulton AC, Rushton J, Claire Wathes D. The management and associated costs of rearing heifers on UK dairy farms from weaning to conception. Open J Anim Sci 2015b; 5: 294-308.

https://doi.org/10.4236/ojas.2015.53034 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ojas.2015.53034

El-Awady HG, Salem AY, Shoaib A. Effect of level of milk production on profitability in lactating Egyptian buffaloes. J Agric Res Kafr El-Sheikh Univ 2016; 42(2): 105-14.

https://doi.org/10.21608/jsas.2016.2876 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21608/jsas.2016.2876

Sibhatu KT, Vijesh VK, Qaim M. Production diversity and dietary diversity in smallholder farm households. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2015; 112: 10657-62.

https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1510982112 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1510982112

Sibhatu KT, Qaim M. Review: meta-analysis of the association between production diversity, diets, and nutrition in smallholder farm households. Food Policy 2018; 77: 1-18.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2018.04.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2018.04.013

Usai MG, Sara Casu, Molle G, Decandia M, Ligios S, Carta A. Using cluster analysis to characterize the goat farming system in Sardinia. Livest Sci 2006; 104: 63-76.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2006.03.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2006.03.013

Fahim NH, Abdel-Salam SAM, Mekkawy W, et al. Delta and Upper Egypt buffalo farming systems: a survey comparison. Egyptian J Anim Prod 2018; 55(2): 95-106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21608/ejap.2018.93242

Meena BS, Verma HC, Singh A. Farmers’ knowledge on productive and reproductive performances of buffalo under smallholder farming system. Buffalo Bulletin 2016; 35(1): 101-8.

Singh TP, Singh R, Singh G, Das KS, Deb SM. Performance of production traits in Nili-Ravi buffaloes. Indian J Anim Sci 2011; 81: 1231-8.

Martens H, Bange Chr. Longevity of high producing dairy cows: a case study. Lohman Information 2013; 48(1): 53-7.

McDermott JJ, Randolph TF, Staal SJ. The economics of optimal health and productivity in smallholder systems in developing countries. Rev Sci Tech 1999; 18(2): 399-424.

https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.18.2.1167 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.18.2.1167

Ahmed AM, Elsheikh SM, Sadek RR. Sustainable development of mixed farming systems in a newly reclaimed area in Egypt. Seminar of the Scientific-Professional Network on Mediterranean Livestock Farming, 2, Zaragoza (Spain), 18-20 May 2008. Options Mediterraneennes 2008; Series A (78): 31-8.

Tuyen DK, Van Ly N. The role of Swamp buffalo in agricultural production of small farm holder. Livestock Production Division, Department of Agricultural & Forestry Extension (DAFE). 2001; MARD, Ha Noi, Vietnam. Proceedings Buffalo Workshop December, 2001.