Technologies Related with the Artificial Insemination in Buffalo

Authors

  • Vittoria Lucia Barile Agricultural Research Council - Animal Production Research Centre (CRA-PCM) - Via Salaria, 31, 00015 Monterotondo (Rome), Italy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1927-520X.2012.01.02.02

Keywords:

Oestrus detection, teaser bull, automatic system, hormonal treatment, sexing technology

Abstract

In buffalo oestrus behaviour has a lower intensity than in cows and is much more difficult to detect, limiting the application of artificial insemination (AI) program. Several methods of heat detection have been developed for use in cattle; these include visual observation, heat mount detectors, tail paint, chin-ball markers, teaser animals and electronic devices. In buffalo, unlike cattle, the female are receptive to mounting activity mainly by the bull and occasionally by other cows. Consequently unless a buffalo bull is to be left running with the herd it can be difficult to know when oestrus is occurring. The presence of a teaser bull is helpful to identify buffaloes in heat; in this case the standing oestrus is the most reliable sign referable to a next ovulation. Other heat detection aids utilized in buffalo include: pedometers; vaginal probes; pressure sensitive telemetry device (Heat Watch®). In order to increase the use of AI easy management schemes, that not require the identification of oestrus, have been studied. These schemes are based on the manipulation of the hormonal events occurring during the oestrous cycle as: manipulate peripheral progesterone concentration (by PGF2a or progesterone releasing device); manipulate follicular growth and timing of ovulation (by GnRH and PGF2a). A brief description of these technologies, with special reference to synchronization protocols to apply fixed time AI in buffalo, are presented in this review. The potential application of predetermining the sex of offspring will be also discussed, with reference to the techniques available for commercial practice in buffalo.

References

Barile, VL. Reproductive efficiency in female buffaloes. In: Borghese A, editor. Buffalo production and research. REU Technical Series (67) Rome: FAO, 2005; pp. 77-107. ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/010/ah847e/ah847e.pdf

Roelofs J, López-Gatius F, Hunter RHF, van Eerdenburg FJCM, Hanzen CH. When is a cow in estrus. Theriogenology 2010; 74: 327-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.02.016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.02.016

Firk, R. Stamer, E. Junge, W. Krieter, J. Automation of oestrus detection. Livest Prod Sci 2002; 75: 219-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(01)00323-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(01)00323-2

Cavalieri J, Flinker LR, Anderson GA, Macmillan KL. Characteristics of oestrus. Anim Reprod Sci 2003; 76: 1-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(02)00224-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(02)00224-5

Gordon, P. Oestrus detection in dairy cattle. In Practice 2011; 33: 542-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/inp.d7479 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/inp.d7479

Borsberry S. Detecting oestrus in dairy cows. Vet Rec 2011; 169: 45-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vr.d4279 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.d4279

Holman A, Thompson J, Routly JE, et al. Comparison of oestrus detection methods in dairy cattle. Vet Rec 2011; 169: 47-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vr.d2344 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.d2344

Vale WG, Sousa JS, Ribeiro HFL, Ohashi OM, Lau HD, Silva AOA. Preparation of a “teaser” buffalo bull. Buffalo J 1994; 1: 75-9.

Wolfe D, Whitlock RH, Whitlock BK. Preparation of teaser bulls, rams, and bucks. In: Anderson DE, Rings M, Eds. Food animal practice. 5th ed. 2009; p. 364-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-141603591-6.10078-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-141603591-6.10078-8

Morgan GL, Dawson LJ. Development of teaser bulls. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract 2008; 24: 443-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cvfa.2008.06.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvfa.2008.06.004

Baruselli PS. Reprodução de bubalinos. In: I Simposio Brasileiro de Bubalinocultura; Cruz das Almas, Brasil, 1996; pp. 117-53.

Zicarelli L, Esposito L, Campanile G, Di Palo R, Armstrong DT. Effect of using vasectomized bulls. Anim Sci 1997; 47: 171-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(97)00008-0

Moioli BM, Napolitano F, Puppo S, et al. Pattern of oestrus. Anim Sci 1998; 66: 87-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1357729800008869 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1357729800008869

Nebel RL, Dransfield MG, Jobst SM, Bame JH. Automated eletronic systems. Anim Reprod Sci 2000; 60-61: 713-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(00)00090-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(00)00090-7

Rorie RW, Bilby TR, Lester TD. Application of electronic estrus detection. Theriogenology 2002; 57: 137-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(01)00663-X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(01)00663-X

Brehme U, Stollberg U, Holz R, Schleusener T. ALT pedometer—New sensor-aided measurement system. Comput Elect Agric 2008; 62: 73-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2007.08.014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2007.08.014

Nebel RL, Jones CM, Roth Z. Reproduction, Events and Management | Mating Management: Detection of Estrus. In: Fuquay J, Fox P, McSweeney P, editors. Encyclopedia of Dairy Sciences. 2nd ed. Academic Press 2011; pp. 461-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374407-4.00454-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374407-4.00454-4

Di Palo R, Campanile G, Zicarelli L. Tecnologie utilizzate per la rilevazione dei calori e inseminazione strumentale nella specie bufalina. [Use of new technologies for heat detection and artificial insemination in the buffalo] In: Atti 1° Congresso Nazionale sull’Allevamento del Bufalo; 2001: Eboli, Italy, 3-5 ottobre 2001; pp.100-13.

Renzulli E, Gasparrini B, Monaco E, De Rosa A, Zicarelli L, Di Palo R. Influence of the month on the reliability of estrus detection by pedometer in buffalo species (Bubalus bubalis). In: Bubalus bubalis srl edition. Atti 3° Congresso Nazionale sull’Allevamento del Bufalo; 2005: Capaccio-Paestum, Italy, 12-15 ottobre 2005; p. 71.

Baruselli, PS, 2001. Control of follicular development applied to reproduction biotechnologies in buffalo. In: Atti 1° Congresso Nazionale sull’Allevamento del Bufalo; 2001: Eboli, Italy, 3-5 Ottobre 2000; pp.128-46.

Gupta KA, Purohit GN. Use of vaginal electrical resistance. Theriogenology 2001; 56: 235-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(01)00559-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(01)00559-3

Driancourt MA. Regulation of ovarian follicular. Theriogenology 2001; 55: 1211-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(01)00479-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(01)00479-4

Macmillan KL, Segwagwe1 BVE, Pino CS. Associations between the manipulation of patterns. Anim Reprod Sci 2003; 78: 327-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(03)00098-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(03)00098-8

Xu ZZ. Reproduction, Events and Management | Control of EstrousCycles: Synchronization of Ovulation and Insemination. In Fuquay J, Fox P, McSweeney P, Eds. Encyclopedia of Dairy Sciences. 2nd ed. Academic Press 2011; pp. 454-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374407-4.00453-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374407-4.00453-2

Chohan KR, Iqbal J, Asghar AA. Influence of season on fertility. Buffalo J 1993; 9: 65-7.

Sahasrabudhe SA, Pandit RK. PGF2α induced oestrus. Indian J Anim Sci 1997; 67: 513-4.

Brito LFC, Satrapa R, Marson EP, Kastelic JP. Efficacy of PGF2alpha to synchronize estrus. Anim Reprod Sci 2002; 73: 23-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(02)00124-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(02)00124-0

Rao AR, Rao CC. Synchronization of estrus. Vet Rec 1983; 113: 623-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3769/radioisotopes.32.12_623

Singh G, Singh GB, Sharma RD, Nanda AS. Experimental treatment. Theriogenology 1983; 19: 323-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(83)90088-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(83)90088-2

Hattab SA, Kadoom AK, Palme R, Bamberg E. Effect of CRESTAR. Theriogenology 2000; 54: 1007-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(00)00409-X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(00)00409-X

Barile VL, Galasso A, Pacelli C, et al. Conception rate in synchronized and artificially inseminated buffalo cows in two different seasons under field conditions. In: Recent Progress in Animal Production Science.1; 1999. Proc. XIII A.S.P.A. Congress, Piacenza, Italy 21-24 June 1999; pp. 262-4.

Barile VL, Pacelli C, Galasso A, De Mauro GJ, Francillo M, Cigliano A et al. Inseminazione artificiale nella bufala. – Risultati di prove condotte nel Lazio. [Artificial insemination in buffaloes. - Results of trials carried out in the Lazio region]. In: Atti 1° Congresso Nazionale sull’Allevamento del Bufalo; 2001. Eboli, Italy, 3-5 Ottobre 2001; pp. 354-8.

Barile VL, Galasso A, Terzano GM, Malfatti A, Barbato O. Valutazione del picco di LH in bufale (Bubalus bubalis) sottoposte a sincronizzazione dell’estro ai fini della inseminazione artificiale [Evaluation of LH peak in oestrus synchronized buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) to perform artificial insemination]. In: Atti LII Convegno Nazionale S.I.S.Vet.; 1998. Silvi Marina, Italy, 17-19 Settembre 1988; pp. 85-86.

Borghese A, Barile VL, Terzano GM, Galasso A, Malfatti A, Barbato O. Time of LH peak in oestrus synchronized buffaloes in two different seasons. In: Book of Abstract of 50th EAAP Annual Meeting; 1999. Zurich, Switzerland, 22-26 August 1999; p. 166.

Barile VL, Galasso A, Carretta A, Marchiori E, Borghese A. Evaluation of different timed inseminations on conception rate in synchronised Italian buffaloes. In: Proc. VI World Buffalo Congress; 2001. Maracaibo, Venezuela, 20-30 May 2000; pp. 172-8.

Pursley JR, Mee MO, Wiltbank MC. Synchronization of ovulation. Theriogenology 1995; 44: 915-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(95)00279-H DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(95)00279-H

Pursley JR, Silcox RW, Wiltbank MC. Effect of time of artificial insemination. J Dairy Sci 1998; 81: 2139-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(98)75790-X

De Rensis F, Ronci G, Guarneri P, et al. Conception rate after fixed time insemination Theriogenology 2005; 63: 1824-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.07.024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.07.024

de Araujo Berber RC, Madureira EH, Baruselli PS. Comparison of two ovsynch protocols. Theriogenology 2002; 57: 1421-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(02)00639-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(02)00639-8

Neglia G, Gasparrini B, Di Palo R, De Rosa C, Zicarelli L, Campanile G. Comparison of pregnancy rates. Theriogenology 2003; 60: 125-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(02)01328-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(02)01328-6

Barile VL, Pacelli C, De Santis G, et al. Fixed time artificial insemination in buffalo using two different hormonal schedule for oestrus synchronization. Preliminary results. In: Proc. 7th World Buffalo Congress; 2004. Manila, Philippine, October 20-23 2004; II, pp. 585-87.

Seidel GE Jr, Johnson LA. Sexing mammalian sperm. Theriogenology 1999; 52: 1267-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(99)00215-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(99)00215-0

Garner DL, Seidel GE Jr. History of commercializing sexed semen for cattle. Theriogenology 2008; 69: 886-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.01.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.01.006

Campanile G, Gasparrini B, Vecchio D, et al. Pregnancy rates following AI. Theriogenology 2011; 76: 500-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2011.02.029 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2011.02.029

Emlab Genetics 2009-2012 [homepage on the Internet]. Press release: December 2007; August 2010. Available from: http://www.emlabgenetics.com/

Downloads

Published

2012-08-29

How to Cite

Barile, V. L. (2012). Technologies Related with the Artificial Insemination in Buffalo . Journal of Buffalo Science, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.6000/1927-520X.2012.01.02.02

Issue

Section

Theme Issue - Use of Reproductive Techniques in Buffalo

Most read articles by the same author(s)